以制度护航伦理:美国大学科研立项的准入制度研究

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (0)

全文: PDF (1098 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要本研究从审查前期教育与培训、申请时的材料审核与评估、申请后的过程监管三阶段考察美国大学科研立项的准入制度,总结出其蕴含法律条例护航、经济杠杆助推、第三方参与、专业人士保障等诸多成功经验,同时也面临自身审批程序僵化、社科领域审查专业性不足、研究自由与科研伦理之间的矛盾、市场机制下商业科研审查机构对院校科研审查的冲击等一系列挑战,旨在为中国研究者从事实地调查以及科研管理机构进行制度完善提供相关经验。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	李函颖
	李娜

关键词 ：院校审查委员会, 科研立项, 准入制度, 教育培训

Abstract：The study investigates the access system of scientific research projects in American universities from three approval processes:the education and training at the early stage of investigation,the application of materials audit and assessment,the process supervision after application.It points out the successful experience of the system,such as escalation of legal regulations,economic leverage,third party participation and professional protection.However,the system also faces lots of challenges.For example,the rigidity of the approval process,lack of professional in the field of social sciences review,the contradiction between research freedom and scientific research ethics,the impact of commercial research review agencies on university research review under the market mechanism and so on.This study is designed to provide relevant experience in field survey for researchers and the institutional improvement for scientific research review institutions in China.

Key words： University IRB Research project Access system Training

收稿日期: 2021-01-08

PACS:

G649

基金资助:全国教育科学规划国家青年课题 “一流大学境外专任教师引入与管理的国际经验与本土实践” (CDA190259)。

作者简介: 李函颖(1986-),女,湖南衡阳人,副教授、博士,研究方向为比较高等教育、高等教育管理与政策。

引用本文:

李函颖, 李娜. 以制度护航伦理:美国大学科研立项的准入制度研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2021(10): 170-179.
Li Hanying, Li Na. Convoying Ethics in Scientific Research by Institutions:A Study on the Access System of Scientific Research Projects in American Universities. , 2021(10): 170-179.

链接本文:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/CN/Y2021/I10/170

[1]WEINBAUM C,LANDREE E,BLUMENTHAL M S,et al.Ethics in scientific research:an examination of ethical principles and emerging topics[R/OL].[2019-10-09].Santa Monica,CA:RAND Corporation,2019.https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2912.html.
[2]陈传夫,焦钰巧.科研理论规范的调查与体系优化研究[J].中国科技论坛,2020 (5):28.
[3]The Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative (CITI Program).Trusted by top organizations[EB/OL].[2017-09-18].https://about.citiprogram.org/en/citi-program-advantages/.
[4]The Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative (CITI Program).Mission and history[EB/OL].[2017-09-18].https://about.citiprogram.org/en/mission-and- history/.
[5]The Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative (CITI Program).Human subjects research (HSR)[EB/OL].[2017-08-15].https:// about.citiprogram.org/en/series/human-subjects-research-hsr/.
[6]The Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative (CITI Program).Social-behavioral-educational (SBE)basic[EB/OL].[2021-02-04].https://about.citiprogram.org/en/course/human-subjects-research-2/.
[7]CHARLES L B,RAYMOND G D.Bureaucracies of mass deception:institutional review boards and the ethics of ethnographic research[J].The annals of the American academy,2004 (595):258.
[8]The Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative (CITI Program).IRB chair[EB/OL].[2017-09-20].https://about.citiprogram.org/en/course/irb-chair-course/.
[9]Stanford University.IRB composition and membership[EB/OL].[2016-03-28].http://researchcompliance.stanford.edu/hs/ hrpp/Documents/hrpp_entire.pdf.
[10]Harvard University.Committee on the use of human subjects.harvard university institutional review boards[EB/OL].[2016-03-21].http:// cuhs.harvard.edu/procedures/harvard-university-irb.
[11]U.S.Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).Office for human research protections.45 CFR 46 subpart A-basic HHS policy for protection of human research subjects 46.107 IRB membership[EB/OL].[2016-03-28].https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/45-cfr-46/index.html#46.107.
[12]Stanford University.IRB composition and membership[EB/OL].[2016-03-28].http://researchcompliance.stanford.edu/hs/ hrpp/Documents/hrpp_entire.pdf77.
[13]University of Georgia.IRB Meeting preparation[EB/OL].[2017-09-20].https://research.uga.edu/hso/policies-and-procedures/.
[14]FISKE S T.Institutional review boards:from bane to benefit[J].Perspectives on psychological science,2009 (4):30.
[15]Harvard University.Principal investigator eligibility[EB/OL].[2017-05-01].https://research.fas.harvard.edu/policies/principal-investigator-eligibility.
[16]University of Michigan.Research ethics & compliance operations manual part 3-HRPP policy[EB/OL].[2016-03-01].http://research-compliance.umich.edu/operations-manual-part-3-hrpp-policy#irbreview.
[17]University of Georgia,Office of Research.Principal investigator eligibility[EB/OL].[2017-09-20].https://research.uga.edu /hso/policies-and-procedures/.
[18]Harvard University.Do you need a faculty sponsor[EB/OL].[2017-05-01].https://cuhs.harvard.edu/who-needs-facult-sponsor.
[19]蒋惠玲.美国大学伦理审查委员会的运作及其制度基础[J].比较教育研究,2011,33 (3):18.
[20]赛德曼.质性研究中的访谈:教育与社会科学研究者指南 (第三版)[M].周海涛,译.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2009.
[21]UC Berkeley.Informed consent[EB/OL].[2016-03-01].http://cphs.berkeley.edu/informedconsent.html.
[22]U.S.Department of Health and Human Services (HHS),Office for Human Research Protections.Subpart A-basic HHS policy for protection of human research subjects46.101 To what does this policy apply[EB/OL].[2016-10-25].https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/45-cfr-46/index.html#46.101.
[23]University of Michigan.U-M exemption categories policy on exempt research[EB/OL].[2017-10-31].https://research-compliance.umich.edu/sites/default/files/resource-download/hrpp_operationsmanual.pdf#page=44.
[24]U.S.Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).Regulations,policy & guidance.OHRP expedited review categories[EB/OL].[2017-10-15].https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/guidance/categories-of-research-expedited-review-procedure-1998/index.html.
[25]LINCOLN Y S,TIERNEY W G.Qualitative research and institutional review boards[J].Qualitative inquiry,2004,10 (2):219-234.
[26]University of Michigan.Continuing review[EB/OL].[2016-03-28].https://research-compliance.umich.edu/sites/default/files/resource-download/hrpp_operationsmanual.pdf#page=22.
[27]Harvard University.Complaints,non-compliance,and suspension or termination of CUHS approval of research[EB/OL].[2016-03-28].https://cuhs.harvard.edu/procedures/complaints-non-compliance-and-suspension-or-termintion-cuhs-approval-research.
[28]Duke University Health System.Continuing review[EB/OL].[2017-09-22].https://irb.duhs.duke.edu/sites/irb.duhs.duke.edu/files/Continuing%20Review.pdf.
[29]Department of Health,Education,and Welfare,Office of the Secretary.Belmont report 1979[EB/OL].[2017-05-01].https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/sites/default/files/the-belmont-report-508c_FINAL.pdf
[30]Michigan Department of Health and Human Services. Institutional review board policy and procedures[EB/OL].https://www.michigan.gov/documents/IRB_PP_Final_155569_7.pdf.
[31]National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics.Higher education R&D expenditures,by source of funds:FYs 2011-2019[EB/OL].[2021-02-03].https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf21313.
[32]National Science Board.Top six federal agencies'shares of federally funded academic R&D expenditures:FYs2007-16[EB/0L].[2021-02-04].https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/assets/968/tables/tt05-04.pdf
[33]University of Michigan.Operations manual[EB/OL].[2016-03-28].http://research-compliance.umich.edu/operations -manual-contents-page.
[34]Amherst College.IRB policies,procedures,and review guidelines[EB/OL].[2017-04-28].https://www.amherst.edu/academiclife/dean_faculty/faccommittees/irb_iacuc/irb#training.
[35]OCEAN M,HIRSCHI M.Public and tribal community college institutional review boards:a national descriptive analysis[J].Community college journal of research and practice,2016 (40):261.
[36]U.S.Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).Office for human research protections online education[EB/OL].[2016-09-25].https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/education-and-outreach/online-education/index.hm.
[37]University of Michigan.PEERRS[EB/OL].[2016-09-25].http://my.research.umich.edu/peers/?_ga=1.89534043.1382855569.1456060001.
[38]Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Program.AAHRPP accredits four more research organizations,including first in Africa,South America[EB/OL].[2021-02-04].https://www.aahrpp.org/learn/find-an-accredited-organization.
[39]The Ohio State University.Information for IRB members[EB/OL].[2017-10-01].http://orrp.osu.edu/files/2016/10/information-for-IRB-Members.pdf.
[40]GRAY B,COOKE R A.The impact of institutional review boards on research[J].Hastings center report,1980,10(1):36.
[41]American Association of University Professors.Institutional review boards and social science research[EB/OL].[2016-09-23].https://www.aaup.org/AAUP/comm/rep/A/protecting.htm.
[42]TIERNEY W G,CORWIN Z B.The tensions between academic freedom and institutional review boards[J].Qualitative inquiry,2007 (13):395.
[43]U.S.Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).Office of inspector general.institutional review boards:the emergence of independent boards[EB/OL].[2017-09-01].https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-01-97-00192.pdf.