The Growth Path of Chinese Original Innovative Talents——Evidence from Authors of Nature or Science Publications
Ni Rong1, Liu Weishu2, Hu Guangyuan1
1. School of Public Economics and Administration,Shanghai University of Finance and Economics,Shanghai 200433,China; 2. School of Information Management and Artificial Intelligence,Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics,Hangzhou 310018,China
Abstract：Upgrading original innovation ability and constructing human capital is the foundation of Chinese S&T self-reliance.Based on the vitae of 167 scholars from China's Mainland who have published Nature or Science papers and their more than 15,000 publication records,this study explores the growth path of Chinese top researchers.Through a combination of bibliometrics,vitae analysis and statistical analysis,we found that 46.1% scholars published their first Nature or Science paper in less than 5 years of research.There is a“generation effect”in the education and academic training of researchers of different ages.Scholars without overseas experience tend to publish their top journal articles earlier.However,scholars who are signed as corresponding authors and have overseas research experience always show a strong level of high-level paper output.Scholars generally gradually enter the academic maturity stage after 20 years of research work(around the age of 45).Suggestions to promote the improvement of China's original innovation ability and improve the training and evaluation mechanism of innovation talents are proposed in the end.
倪蓉, 刘维树, 胡光元. 中国原始创新人才成长路径研究——基于《自然》《科学》论文作者的分析[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2022(1): 28-35.
Ni Rong, Liu Weishu, Hu Guangyuan. The Growth Path of Chinese Original Innovative Talents——Evidence from Authors of Nature or Science Publications. , 2022(1): 28-35.
[1] 陈劲,谢靓红.原始性创新研究综述[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2004(2):23-26. [2] 刘忠艳,赵永乐,王斌.1978—2017年中国科技人才政策变迁研究[J].中国科技论坛.2018(2):136-144. [3] ZHU J,LIU W.Comparing like with like:China ranks first in SCI-indexed research articles since 2018[J].Scientometrics,2020,124(2):1691-1700. [4] LIU W.China's SCI-indexed publications:facts,feelings,and future directions[J].ECNU review of education,2020(3):562-569. [5] 苏屹,李柏洲.原始创新研究文献综述[J].科学管理研究,2012,30(2):5-8. [6] 库恩.科学革命的结构[M].第4版.金吾伦,胡新和,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2012. [7] 唐莉,胡光元,刘维树,等.创新型城市的基础科研发展评估:基于深圳的实证分析[J].公共行政评论,2017,10(6):47-64,210. [8] 王璞,刘子扬,刘雪立.2001—2010年Nature和Science发表我国科研论文及其学术影响力——基于SCI数据库的综合分析[J].中国科技期刊研究,2011,22(6):844-847. [9] 朱强,陶华,孙良英,等.中国2004—2013年Cell、Nature、Science论文产出状况及国际地位变化分析[J].中国科技期刊研究,2014,25(9):1178-1180. [10] 董彦邦,刘莉.我国高校高水平论文的机构合作网络演化分析——以1978—2017年的Nature和Science合作论文为例[J].情报杂志,2019,38(11):138-144,157. [11] TANG L,WALSH J P.Bibliometric fingerprints:name disambiguation based on approximate structure equivalence of cognitive maps[J].Scientometrics,2010,84(3):763-794. [12] KAWASHIMA H,TOMIZAWA H.Accuracy evaluation of scopus author ID based on the largest funding database in Japan[J].Scientometrics,2015,103(3):1061-1071. [13] VALERIA A.Does the scopus author ID suffice to track scientific international mobility? A case study based on Leibniz laureates[J].Scientometrics,2018,117(2):705-720. [14] 刘红煦,唐莉.获评高被引学者会提升学术产出与影响力吗——来自整体与个体层面的双重验证[J] 科学学研究,2021,39(2):212-221. [15] 周海花,华薇娜.从世界顶级学术期刊看中国科研竞争力——中国学者《自然》和《科学》发文分析[J].情报杂志,2012,31(6):91-96. [16] 赵蓉英,全薇.中国学者在世界顶级期刊的发文分析——基于2000—2015年Cell、Nature和Science的载文统计分析[J].情报杂志,2016,35(10):95-99. [17] 阎光才.学术生命周期与年龄作为政策的工具[J].北京大学教育评论,2016,14(4):124-138,188. [18] 国家自然科学基金委:拟设立专门项目支持45岁以上高端人才[EB/OL].(2020-12-07)[2020-12-20].https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1685422039039232680&wfr=spider&for=pc. [19] 喻修远,王凯伟.城市人才争夺:问题生成、利弊博弈与化解策略[J].中国行政管理,2019(3):88-92.
2022, 
