Abstract：Realizing breakthrough technological innovation through reverse R&D outsourcing has become an active strategic choice for China's equipment manufacturing industry to realize transformation and upgrading.Using the method of multi-case analysis,this paper clarifies the impact mechanism of the interaction between the enterprise's own knowledge structure and organizational learning mode on breakthrough technological innovation at different stages of embedding and evolution of local/international dual innovation networks in the process of reverse R&D outsourcing,and constructs the corresponding theoretical model.On this basis,fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA)is used to reveal the multiple causal paths for equipment manufacturing enterprises to realize breakthrough technological innovation in the process of reverse R&D outsourcing.The study found that in the initial stage of the local innovation network embeddedness and the initial and advanced stages of the international innovation network embeddedness,the breadth and depth of the enterprise knowledge and the exploratory learning and the exploitation learning constitute the conditional configuration of the breakthrough technological innovation.In the advanced stage of local innovation network embeddedness,enterprise explorative learning and its knowledge width and depth constitute the conditional configuration of the breakthrough technological innovation.Among them,the knowledge width of enterprises constitutes the core condition of breakthrough technological innovation.
杨瑾, 于妍惠. 基于逆向研发外包的装备制造业突破性技术创新路径研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2022(3): 82-90.
Yang Jin, Yu Yanhui. Research on Breakthrough Technology Innovation Path of Equipment Manufacturing Industry Based on Reverse R&D Outsourcing. , 2022(3): 82-90.
[1]SRIVASTAVA M K,GNYAWALI D R.When do relational resources matter? leveraging portfolio technological resources for breakthrough innovation[J]. Academy of management journal,2011,54 (4):797-810. [2]GEBREEYESUS M,MOHNEN P.Innovation performance and embeddedness in networks:evidence from the ethiopian footwear cluster[J]. World development,2013,41 (3):302-316. [3]陈羽,黄晶磊,谭蓉娟.逆向外包、价值链租金与欠发达国家产业升级[J].产业经济研究,2014 (4):1-12. [4]ANDREVSKI G,BRASS D J,FERRIER W J.Alliance portfolio configurations and competitive action frequency[J]. Journal of management,2013,42 (4):811-837. [5]辛德强,党兴华,薛超凯.双重嵌入下网络惯例刚性对探索性创新的影响[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35 (4):10-15. [6]魏江,徐蕾.知识网络双重嵌入,知识整合与集群企业创新能力[J].管理科学学报,2014,17 (2):34-47. [7]陈启斐,王晶晶,岳中刚.研发外包是否会抑制我国制造业自主创新能力[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2015 (2):53-69. [8]吕斯尧,赵文红,杨特.知识基础、战略导向对新创企业绩效的影响——基于注意力基础的视角[J].研究与发展管理,2019,31 (2):1-10. [9]刘景东,党兴华,谢永平.不同知识位势下知识获取方式与技术创新的关系研究——基于行业差异性的实证分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015,36 (1):44-52. [10]曹勇,杜蔓,肖琦,等.企业创新氛围、双元组织学习与创新绩效——环境动态性的调节效应[J].科技管理研究,2019 (10):17-22. [11]JIN J L,ZHOU K Z,WANG Y.Exploitation and exploration in international joint ventures:moderating effects of partner control imbalance and product similarity[J]. Journal of international marketing,2016,24 (4):20-38. [12]邵云飞,詹坤,吴言波.突破性技术创新:理论综述与研究展望[J].技术经济,2017,36 (4):30-37. [13]RAJAN R S.Outward foreign direct investment from India:trends,determinants and implications[R]. ISAS working paper,2009 (66):1-30. [14]刘丹鹭,岳中刚.逆向研发外包与中国企业成长——基于长江三角洲地区自主汽车品牌的案例研究[J].产业经济研究,2011 (4):44-52. [15]高太山,柳卸林.企业国际研发联盟是否有助于突破性创新[J].科研管理,2016,37 (1):48-57. [16]杨瑾.网络关系嵌入对高端装备制造业供应链协同能力和绩效的影响研究[J].商业经济与管理,2015 (8):5-13. [17]GRILLITSCH M,NILSSON M.Innovation in peripheral regions:do collaborations compensate for a lack of local knowledge spillovers [J]. Annals of regional science,2015,54 (1):299-321. [18]崔晓杨,吕鑫,魏云捷,等.消费类电子信息企业并购绩效分析——以TCL集团为例[J].管理评论,2017,29 (11):251-260. [19]魏涛.中国企业海外并购无形资源获取及对策研究——基于联想集团并购IBMPC业务与上汽集团并购韩国双龙汽车的案例分析[J].宏观经济研究,2016 (6):152-159. [20]ZHU H,ZHU Q,DING Z.The roles of Chinese CEOs in managing individualistic cultures in cross-border mergers and acquisitions[J]. Journal of management studies,2020,57 (3):664-697. [21]WILLIAMSON P J,RAMAN A P.How China reset its global acquisition strategy[J]. Harvard business review,2011 (4):109-114. [22]杨瑾,侯兆麟.逆向研发外、组织学习与装备制造业突破性技术创新[J].科学决策,2020 (3):23-41. [23]BERTRAND O,MOL M J.The antecedents and innovation effects of domestic and offshore R&D outsourcing:the contingent impact of cognitive distance and absorptive capacity[J]. Strategic management journal,2013,34 (6):751-760. [24]COHEN W M,LEVINTHAL D A.Absorptive capacity:a new perspective on learning and innovation[J]. Administrative science quarterly,1990,35:128-152. [25]ARGYRIS C,SCHON D A.Organizational learning[M]. Reading:Addison-Wesley,1981. [26]MOORTHY S,POLLY D E.Technological knowledge breadth and depth:Performance impacts[J]. Journal of knowledge management,2010,14 (3):359-377. [27]CARPENTER M,BAUER T,ERDOGAN B.Principles of management [M]. Boston:Flat World Knowledge,Inc.,2009. [28]曾德明,曾雅兰,邹思明.知识获取策略对企业绩效的影响——知识基础的调节作用[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015,36 (9):31-39. [29]王晨曦,范雪灵,周禹.CEO变革导向领导行为与组织的探索性技术创新:创新氛围和组织学习的链式中介作用[J].经济管理,2017,39 (7):120-133. [30]岳鹄,张宗益,朱怀念.创新主体差异性、双元组织学习与开放式创新绩效[J].管理学报,2018,15 (1):48-56. [31]郭尉.知识异质、组织学习与企业创新绩效关系研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2016,37 (7):118-125. [32]蔡虹,刘岩,向希尧.企业知识基础对技术合作的影响研究[J].管理学报,2013,10 (6):875-881. [33]RAGIN C C.The Comparative method:moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies[M]. Berkeley:University of California Press,1987. [34]刘丰.定性比较分析与国际关系研究[J].世界经济与政治,2015 (1):90-110. [35]杜运周,贾良定.组态视角与定性比较分析 (QCA):管理学研究的一条新道路[J].管理世界,2017 (6):155-167. [36]章文光,王耀辉.哪些因素影响了产业升级？——基于定性比较分析方法的研究[J].北京师范大学学报 (社会科学版),2018 (1):132-142. [37]詹坤,邵云飞.突破性技术创新的非线性与非连续性演化:以智能驾驶汽车为例[J].技术经济,2017,36 (5):66-73. [38]ZHOU K Z,FANG W.Technological capability,strategic flexibility,and product innovation[J]. Strategic management journal,2010,31 (5):547-561. [39]BIERLY P,CHAKRABARTI A.Generic knowledge strategies in the U.S.pharmaceutical industry[J]. Strategic management journal,1996,17:123-135. [40]MOORMAN C,MINER A S.The impact of organizational memory on new product performance and creativity[J]. Journal of marketing research,1997,34 (1):91-106. [41]RIHOUX B,RAGIN C C.Configurational comparative methods:qualitative comparative analysis (QCA)and related techniques[M]. Thousand Oaks:Sage,2009. [42]FISS P C.Building better causal theories:a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research[J]. Academy of management journal,2011,54 (2):393-420. [43]CODURASA A,CLEMENTE J A,RUIZ J.A novel application of fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to GEM data[J]. Journal of business research,2016,69 (4):1265-1270. [44]赵文,王娜.二元网络背景下中国海归企业绩效提升路径研究——基于模糊集的定性比较分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2017,38 (5):128-139. [45]RAGIN C C.Set relations in social research:evaluating their consistency and coverage[J]. Political analysis,2006 (14):291-310. [46]RAGIN C C,FISS P C.Net effects analysis versus configurational analysis:an empirical demonstration[J]. Redesigning social inquiry:fuzzy sets and beyond,2008 (240):190-212.
2022, 
