人脸识别个人信息的倾斜保护
石超1 , 张蓓洁2
1.中南财经政法大学法学院,湖北 武汉 430073;
On the Tilting Protection of Personal Information in Facial Recognition
Shi Chao1 , Zhang Beijie2
1. Law School,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China;
摘要 人脸识别技术的应用虽具有一定的合理性,但也将人脸这一敏感信息置于风险之地。在自治性保护规范下,人脸识别个人信息的保护面临着知情同意规则失灵、合理信赖关系失衡以及救济机制失准等制度困境。走出困境,人脸识别的个人信息保护模式可转向 “倾斜保护”:采取倾斜配置权利义务的方式强化保护,一方面,保障信息主体有意义的知情权与选择权;另一方面,对信息处理者设定 “受托人义务”,明确双方特殊的信任关系,提升其作为管理人的注意义务和勤勉尽责义务;同时,救济上对信息主体以有利且便利的原则给予制度保障。如此,可恢复人脸识别应用场景下信息授受双方的实质平等,促进强弱双方的利益平衡,走向公平正义的法秩序。
关键词 ：
人脸识别 ,
敏感信息 ,
信息自主 ,
倾斜保护
Abstract ：The application of facial recognition technology has certain rationality,but it also puts the sensitive information of face at risk.Under the autonomous protection norms,the protection of personal information in facial recognition is faced with institutional dilemmas such as the failure of “informed consent”rule,the imbalance of reasonable trust relationship and the Mismatch of relief mechanism.Out of the predicament,the personal information protection mode of facial recognition can be turned to “inclined protection”:to strengthen protection by inclined allocation of rights and obligations,on the one hand,to ensure the meaningful right to know and make choice;On the other hand,those who process information are subject to “fiduciary duty”,to clarify the special trust relationship between the two parties and enhance their duty of care and diligence as managers;At the same time,the relief system guarantees the information subject with the principle of advantage and convenience.In this way,it can restore the substantive equality between the information giver and receiver in the facial recognition application scenario,promote the balance of interests between the strong and the weak,and move towards a fair and just legal order.
Key words ：
Facial recognition
Sensitive information
Information autonomy
Tilt protection
收稿日期: 2021-06-09
作者简介 : 石超 (1987-),男,河南南阳人,法学博士,中南财经政法大学法学院讲师,研究方向为经济法。
引用本文:
石超 , 张蓓洁. 人脸识别个人信息的倾斜保护[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2022(4): 146-156.
链接本文:
http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/CN/Y2022/I4/146
[1]杭州市富阳区人民法院. (2019)浙0111民初6971号郭兵与杭州野生动物世界有限公司服务合同纠纷一审民事判决书[EB/OL]. (2020-11-24).https://wenshu.court.gov.cn/website/wenshu/181107ANFZ0BXSK4/index.html?docId=0d5660e6ee794498bbf8ac7d00a8dddb.
2022, 
