Influence of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Industry-University- Research Cooperation Network Characteristics on the Transformation of Scientific and Technological Achievements
Guo Ying1, Duan Weiyu1, Meng Jing2, Wang Mingxing1
1. School of Business,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China; 2. School of Management,Jilin University,Changchun 130012,China
Abstract:In order to explore the important role played by the industry-university-research cooperation network characteristics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in the transformation of its scientific and technological achievements,this study uses the patent-based scientific and technological achievements transformation date of the Chinese Academy of Sciences as a sample,and uses the social network analysis method to construct an“Industry-Research Institute”(IR),“University-Research Institute”(UR),and“Industry-University-Research Institute”(IUR)collaboration network,and further explores the influence of network characteristics on the transformation performance of scientific and technological achievements by means of regression.The results show that in the IR cooperation network,the weighted centrality and structural hole of the Chinese Academy of Sciences have a significant positive impact on the transformation performance of scientific and technological achievements.In the UR cooperation network,the weighted centrality of the Chinese Academy of Sciences has no significant effect on the performance of the transformation of scientific and technological achievements,and the structural holes it occupies have a significant positive impact on the performance of the transformation of scientific and technological achievements.In the IUR cooperation network,the weighted centrality of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the structural holes it occupies have no significant impact on the transformation performance of its scientific and technological achievements.This study provides a new decision-making reference for strengthening the management practice of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and other scientific research institutes to strengthen the transformation of scientific and technological achievements and improving their performance of the transformation of scientific and technological achievements.
郭颖, 段炜钰, 孟婧, 王明星. 中国科学院产学研合作网络特征对其科技成果转化绩效的影响[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2022(5): 81-89.
Guo Ying, Duan Weiyu, Meng Jing, Wang Mingxing. Influence of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Industry-University- Research Cooperation Network Characteristics on the Transformation of Scientific and Technological Achievements. , 2022(5): 81-89.
[1]许轶,许婧,余鲭鲭,等.我国科研院所技术转移特征研究[J].科技管理研究,2020,40(3):78-83. [2]孙玉涛,刘小萌.高校研发合作网络位置与技术成果转移——技术转移中心的调节作用[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2018,39(8):3-12. [3]GUAN J,ZHAO Q.The impact of university-industry collaboration networks on innovation in nano biopharmaceuticals[J].Technological forecasting and social change,2013,80(7):1271-1286. [4]CHEN K,ZHANG Y,ZHU G,et al.Do research institutes benefit from their network positions in research collaboration networks with industries or/and universities[J].Technovation,2020,94:102002. [5]BOZEMAN B,RIMES H,YOUTIE J.The evolving state-of-the-art in technology transfer research:revisiting the contingent effectiveness model[J].Research policy,2015,44(1):34-49. [6]吕晶晶.构筑产学研合作平台加快高校科技成果转化[J].中国高校科技,2016(8):77-79. [7]MEHDI B,NAZANIN J,MORTEZA M.Examine the commercialization research outcomes in Iran:a structural equation model[J].International journal of business & management,2011,6(7):261-275. [8]张永安,闫瑾.技术创新政策对企业创新绩效影响研究——基于政策文本分析[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33(1):108-113. [9]BURT R S.The contingent value of social capital[J].Administrative science quarterly,1997,42(2):339-365. [10]刁丽琳,朱桂龙.产学研合作中的契约维度、信任与知识转移——基于多案例的研究[J].科学学研究,2014,32(6):890-901. [11]HANSEN M T.The search-transfer problem:the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits[J].Administrative science quarterly,1999,44(1):82-111. [12]刘雯,曹思未,叶静怡.社会网络与高校专利技术成果转移[J].世界经济,2020,43(9):173-192. [13]SCOTT J,CARRINGTON P J.The SAGE handbook of social network analysis[M].London:SAGE publications,2011. [14]刘佳源,李军,颜建周.关系与结构洞的碰撞:科技成果转化中的隐性知识转化[J].科技进步与对策,2020,38(7):19-28. [15]李昕,杨皎平.联盟选择如何影响企业创新绩效——结构洞的中介作用[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(15):80-88. [16]MARKOCZY L,SUN S L,PENG M W,et al.Social network contingency,symbolic management,and boundary stretching[J].Strategic management journal,2013,34(11):1367-1387. [17]DORNBUSCH F,NEUHÄUSLER P.Composition of inventor teams and technological progress:the role of collaboration between academia and industry[J].Research policy,2015,44(7):1360-1375. [18]BURT R S.Structural holes:the social structure of competition[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1992. [19]李晨蕾,柳卸林,朱丽.国际研发联盟网络结构对企业创新绩效的影响研究——基于社会资本视角[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2017,38(1):54-63. [20]YUTAO,SUN,KAI,et al.Proximity effect,preferential attachment and path dependence in inter-regional network:a case of China's technology transaction[J].Scientometrics,2016,108(1):201-220. [21]MARTIN G,GOEZUEBUEYUEK R,BECERRA M.Interlocks and firm performance:the role of uncertainty in the directorate interlock-performance relationship[J].Strategic management journal,2015,36(2):235-253. [22]黄灿,徐戈,李兰花,等.中国高校和科研院所科技成果转化制度改革——基于专利技术交易数据的分析[J].科技导报,38(24):92-102. [23]常宏建,张震,任恺.基于复杂网络理论的产学研合作网络结构及特性研究[J].山东经济,2011(2):73-77. [24]O'KANE C,MANGEMATIN V,GEOGHEGAN W,et al.University technology transfer offices:the search for identity to build legitimacy[J].Research policy,2015,44(2):421-437.