System Innovation Logic for Supporting New R&D Institutions——Comparing the Institution in Shenzhen,Beijing,Nanjing and Shanghai
Jiang Chun1, Li Shihan2, Hu Feng3, Cheng Long4
1. School of International Relations & Public Affairs,Fudan University,Shanghai 200433,China; 2. School of Economics,Fudan University,Shanghai 200433,China; 3. Jiangsu Science and Technology Institute,Nanjing 210042,China; 4. Science and Technology Talents Center,Ministry of Science and Technology,Beijing 100862,China
Abstract：Answering the question of the system generation logic of New R&D institution (NRDI)growth is the basic prerequisite for its development.This paper analyzes the institutional basis for the development of NRDI.Comparing the construction differences among Shenzhen,Beijing,Nanjing,and Shanghai in policy goals,policy instruments,policy implementations and policy effects,we points out that NRDI has the following characteristics.First,the policy goal is more to cultivate new subject rather than upgrading or replacing traditional research institution;Second,the policy tool is to mobilize social forces rather than participating in competition by government;Third,policy implementation has formed a normalized system rather than a temporary measure;Fourth,the policy effect is manifested in the contribution of quality and benefit rather than traditional quantitative indicators.Meanwhile,it has also generated new problems including the legal subject status of NRDIs,market-oriented development capabilities,and the modernization of government sci-tech governance capabilities,which are also the future reform directions.
姜春, 李诗涵, 胡峰, 程龙. 突破制度“高墙”:政府支持新型研发机构的特殊制度逻辑——基于深圳、北京、南京、上海实践的比较[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2022(6): 26-37.
Jiang Chun, Li Shihan, Hu Feng, Cheng Long. System Innovation Logic for Supporting New R&D Institutions——Comparing the Institution in Shenzhen,Beijing,Nanjing and Shanghai. , 2022(6): 26-37.
[1]谭小琴.跨越“死亡谷”:新型研发机构的三维创新[J].自然辩证法研究,2019,35(1):39-43. [2]陈宝明,刘光武,丁明磊.我国新型研发组织发展现状与政策建议[J].中国科技论坛,2013(3):27-31. [3]陈红喜,姜春,袁瑜,等.基于新巴斯德象限的新型研发机构科技成果转移转化模式研究——以江苏省产业技术研究院为例[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(11):36-45. [4]新型研发机构发展报告2020编写组.新型研发机构发展报告2020[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,2020. [5]谷业凯.新型研发机构要有新作为(创新谈)[N].人民日报,2020-07-06(19). [6]马鸿佳,吴娟,郭海,等.创业领域即兴行为研究:前因、结果及边界条件[J].管理世界,2021,37(5):211-229. [7]时歌,黄涛.基于PSR模型的湖北省新型研发机构发展机制研究[J].科学管理研究,2020,38(5):58-64. [8]朱建军,蔡静雯,刘思峰,等.江苏新型研发机构运行机制及建设策略研究[J].科技进步与对策,2013,30(14):36-39. [9]周君璧,陈伟,于磊,等.新型研发机构的不同类型与发展分析[J].中国科技论坛,2021(7):29-36. [10]迟考勋,袭著燕.大学-政府共建式新型研发机构制度创业中的概念化机制:以山东省工业技术研究院为例[J].中国科技论坛,2020(12):134-143. [11]原长弘,王钰莹,刘朝.政府-发起单位双元构建模式研究:基于重庆四家新型研发机构的多案例研究[J].中国科技论坛,2019(2):22-28. [12]夏太寿,张玉赋,高冉晖,等.我国新型研发机构协同创新模式与机制研究——以苏粤陕6家新型研发机构为例[J].科技进步与对策,2014,31(14):13-18. [13]YI G F.Cross-border collaboration strategies in academic entrepreneurship of new R&D institutions:insights from explorative case studies in China[J].Science,technology and society,2019,24(2):288-315. [14]姜春,丁子仪.新型研发组织运行治理的多层次利益分配与激励机制——以江苏省产业技术研究院及其40家专业研究所为例[J].中国科技论坛,2020(7):60-72. [15]陈红喜,姜春,罗利华,等.新型研发机构成果转化扩散绩效评价体系设计[J].情报杂志,2018,37(8):162-171. [16]孟溦,宋娇娇.新型研发机构绩效评估研究:基于资源依赖和社会影响力的双重视角[J].科研管理,2019,40(8):20-31. [17]JIANG L,ZHU J J.A dynamic grey target evaluation method with multiple reference points for new R&D institution performance[J].Journal of intelligent & fuzzy systems,2021,40(3):3831-3847. [18]BLAIR R.Policy tools theory and implementation networks:understanding state enterprise zone partnerships[J].Journal of public administration research & theory,2002,12(2):161-190. [19]ERGAS H.The importance of technology policy[M].London:Cambridge University Press,1987. [20]FLANAGAN K,UYARRA E,LARANJA M.Reconceptualising the policy mix for innovation[J].Research policy,2011,40(5):702-713. [21]彭纪生,仲为国,孙文祥.政策测量、政策协同演变与经济绩效:基于创新政策的实证研究[J].管理世界,2008(9):25-36. [22]BORRAS S,EDQUIST C.The choice of innovation policy instruments[J].Technological forecasting & social change,2013,80(8):1513-1522. [23]EDLE J,GEORGHIOU L.Public procurement and innovation:resurrecting the demand side[J].Research policy,2007,36(7):949-963. [24]HENRIQUES L,LAREDO P.Policy-making in science policy:the OECD model unveiled[J].Research policy,2013,42(3):801-816. [25]EDMONDSON D L.The co-evolution of policy mixes and socio-technical systems:towards a conceptual framework of policy mix feedback in sustainability transitions[J].Research policy,2019,48(10):103555. [26]吕芳.我国政府购买服务的特殊制度逻辑——基于中西方公共服务合同外包实践的比较[J].中国行政管理,2019(9):35-40. [27]国家计委计划经济研究所技术进步与经济效益研究室.《人民日报》《光明日报》科学技术政策言论选编(1950—1985)[M].北京:北京现代管理学院国家计委计划经济研究院,1986. [28]李哲.大转制:中国科研机构管理体制改革二十年[M].北京:人民出版社,2020:13. [29]科研院所改革调查课题组.中央级科研机构改革与发展情况2017年度调查分析报告(社会公益类)[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,2019. [30]贺东航,孔繁斌.公共政策执行的中国经验[J].中国社会科学,2011(5):61-79,220-221. [31]波利特,鲍克尔特.公共管理改革——比较分析[M].夏镇平,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2003:26.
2022, 
