Abstract：Despite the increasing efforts of society to refute rumors,varieties of scientific rumors still have a wide impact.Focusing on the public's scientific thinking ability is another important way to deal with scientific rumors.This research aims to reveal the relationship between public's scientific thinking and the ability to distinguish scientific rumors,and to explore ways to form the ability to deal with them.Based on combing global scientific thinking research and analyzing domestic scientific rumor texts,a scientific thinking ability index system has been constructed.Research under this framework discloses that urban residents' ability to distinguish rumors is low,and the structure of scientific thinking ability is unbalanced.Conventional scientific thinking and general critical thinking have a significant impact on the ability to distinguish rumors,while the ability to query data and academic qualifications have a significant impact on both.Among them,the residents' ability to query data has a strong influence,but the average ability is low.The cultivation of questioning authority,system theory and natural history thinking is presumed to be missing in science education.It is necessary to strengthen the intensity of science communication in the long-term and improve the public's ability to query information.Science education will have an effect in a longer time dimension.
吴琦来, 魏哲远, 孙睿智. 应对科学谣言视角的公众科学思维结构与能力研究——基于对城镇居民的调研[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2022(8): 139-150.
Wu Qilai, Wei Zheyuan, Sun Ruizhi. Research on the Public Scientific Thinking Structure and Ability from the Perspective of Scientific Rumors ——Based on Survey of Urban Residents. , 2022(8): 139-150.
[1]人民日报微博.转发辟谣！这些疫情谣言不要信[EB/OL].(2020-01-28)[2021-05-27].https://weibo.com/2803301701/IrAon8feo?type=comment#_rnd1596465627518. [2]CHORUS A.The basic law of rumor[J].The journal of abnormal and social psychology,1953,48(2):313. [3]SCHMALTZ R M,JANSEN E,WENCKOWSKI N.Redefining critical thinking:teaching students to think like scientists[J].Frontiers in psychology,2017,8:459. [4]人民日报百度百家号.伪科学谣言的“水平”越来越高 怎么破[EB/OL].(2018-08-27)[2021-05-27].https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1609944928575191449&wfr=spider&for=pc. [5]KUHN D.What is scientific thinking and how does it develop[M]//GOSWARMI U.The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development.New Jersey:Wiley-Blackwell,2011. [6]BULLOCK M,SODIAN B,KOERBER S.Doing experiments and understanding science:Development of scientific reasoning from childhood to adulthood[M]//SCHNEIDER W,BULLOCK M.Human development from early childhood to early adulthood:findings from a 20 year longitudinal study.London:Psychology Press,2009. [7]MORRIS B J,CROKER S,MASNICK A M,et al.The emergence of scientific reasoning[M]//KLOOS H,MORRIS B,AMARAL J.Current topics in children's learning and cognition.Paris:BoD-Books on Demand,2012. [8]PERKINS D N,GROTZER T A.Dimensions of causal understanding:the role of complex causal models in students' understanding of science[J].Studies in science education,2005,41(1):117-165. [9]SLOMAN S A,LAGNADO D.Causality in thought[J].Annual review of psychology,2015,66:223-247. [10]KOERBER S,MAYER D,OSTERHAUS C,et al.The development of scientific thinking in elementary school:a comprehensive inventory[J].Child development,2015,86(1):327-336. [11]DUNBAR K,FUGELSANG J.Scientific thinking and reasoning[M]//HOLYOAK K J,MORRISON R G.The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2005. [12]林振义.科学哲学视野中的科学思维方式[J].科学,2013,65(4):3-7. [13]林振义.科学思维方式:结构和生成[J].科学,2013,65(3):1,2-5. [14]胡卫平.科学思维培育学[M].北京:科学出版社,2004. [15]任宁生,邓小丽.科学论证视野下的科学教育教学设计模型建构[J].化学教学,2016(4):14-18. [16]王泉泉,魏铭,刘霞.核心素养框架下科学素养的内涵与结构[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2019(2):52-58. [17]许静,刘健智.香港新一轮科学教育课程改革:缘由、理念与举措[J].湖南师范大学教育科学学报,2019,18(4):119-125. [18]领荣,安涛,任岩.STEM教育中科学思维的培养探究[J].现代教育技术,2019,29(11):107-113. [19]ALLPORT G W,POSTMAN L.The psychology of rumor[M].New York:Holt,Rinehart and Winston,1947. [20]让·诺埃尔·卡普费雷.谣言——世界最古老的传媒[M].郑若麟,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2009. [21]杨鹏,史丹梦.真伪博弈:微博空间的科学传播机制——以“谣言粉碎机”微博为例[J].新闻大学,2011(4):145-150. [22]赵瑞旭.社交媒体时代科学谣言的传播机制——基于2016—2018年“十大科学谣言”的分析[J].青年记者,2020(14):39-40. [23]中华人民共和国教育部.义务教育小学科学课程标准[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2017. [24]加里·阿兰·费因,陈国战.谣言、信任与公民社会:集体记忆与判断的文化[J].文化研究,2014(3):85-101. [25]美国科学促进协会.面向全体美国人的科学[M].北京:科学普及出版社,2001. [26]吴畏.如何对科学态度、情感和价值观进行评价——基于2006年PISA科学素养评价的思考[J].生物学通报,2010,45(7):43-45. [27]中华人民共和国教育部.义务教育小学科学课程标准[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2017. [28]魏晓东.国外科学态度测评研究进展与启示[J].外国中小学教育,2019(11):20-28. [29]Program for International Student Assessment.PISA 2006:science competencies for tomorrow's world:analysis[M/OL].OECD Publishing,(2007)[2021-07-15].https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2006_9789264040014-en. [30]中国科普研究所.新时代公民科学素质指标十问(三)[EB/OL].(2020-05-30)[2021-07-15].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/YouPLz2K2Kjftp5MjO07pg. [31]中华人民共和国教育部.义务教育物理课程标准[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2011. [32]中华人民共和国教育部.义务教育初中科学课程标准[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2011. [33]中华人民共和国教育部.义务教育化学课程标准[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2011. [34]中华人民共和国教育部.义务教育生物学课程标准[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2011. [35]中华人民共和国教育部.普通高中物理课程标准[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2018. [36]中华人民共和国教育部.普通高中化学课程标准[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2018. [37]中华人民共和国教育部.普通高中生物学课程标准[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2018.
2022, 
