The Determining List Strategy of the “Enlisting and Leading”——Based on the Demand-Side Innovation Perspective
Zeng Jingjing1,2, Huang Guihua2
1. Innovation and Talent Base for Income Distribution and Public Finance,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China; 2. School of Public Administration,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China
Abstract：The “Enlisting and Leading” is a new way of scientific research management.How to determine the list items is related to the operation of the whole system and the development direction of national science and technology.However,there is no systematic research on it.Starting from the goal-oriented principle followed by the system,and based on the demand-side perspective,this paper constructs the determining list strategy of the “Enlisting and Leading”.Specifically,the determining list strategy is divided into recommendation list strategy and evaluation strategy.The main subjects of the recommendation list composed of the government,enterprises and the general public has formed three types of lists,that is,the government customized list,the enterprise recommendation list and the social recommendation list.Based on this,their characteristics and application points are analyzed.The evaluation subjects of the list include experts from industry,scientific research,government departments and third parties,whose proportion for different source is different,and which should be tracked and managed.The evaluation criteria of the list are generally based on the technical fields,repetitive research problems,progressiveness,representativeness and realizability of the list items,while the list recommended by enterprises also needs to evaluate the qualification conditions of the list demanders.These conclusions have enriched the theoretical understanding of the“Enlisting and Leading” and provided enlightenment for its practice.
曾婧婧, 黄桂花. “揭榜挂帅”制度的定榜策略——基于需求侧创新视角[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2022(9): 1-10.
Zeng Jingjing, Huang Guihua. The Determining List Strategy of the “Enlisting and Leading”——Based on the Demand-Side Innovation Perspective. , 2022(9): 1-10.
[1]张玲玲,付赛际,张秋柳,等.以大科学装置为依托的高科技园区管控模式分析及对策建议——以中子科学城为例[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(15):14-23. [2]蔡跃洲.中国共产党领导的科技创新治理及其数字化转型——数据驱动的新型举国体制构建完善视角[J].管理世界,2021,37(8):30-46. [3]王有志,张巍巍,张玉赋.新常态下产业技术升级政策研究——以江苏省为例[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(10):39-45. [4]陈劲,阳镇.融通创新视角下关键核心技术的突破:理论框架与实现路径[J].社会科学,2021(5):58-69. [5]王海军.关键核心技术创新的理论探究及中国情景下的突破路径[J].当代经济管理,2021,43(6):43-50. [6]杨思莹.政府推动关键核心技术创新:理论基础与实践方案[J].经济学家,2020(9):85-94. [7]余江,管开轩,李哲,等.聚焦关键核心技术攻关强化国家科技创新体系化能力[J].中国科学院院刊,2020,35(8):1018-1023. [8]曾婧婧,黄桂花.“揭榜挂帅”制虽好,也不能滥用[N].科技日报,2021-04-06(5). [9]曾婧婧.以“揭榜挂帅”激发创新活力[N].湖北日报,2020-11-18(9). [10]熊彼特.经济发展理论[M].何畏,易家详,张军扩,等译.北京:商务印书馆,2017. [11]JACOB S.Invention and economic growth[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1966. [12]MOWERY D,ROSENBERG N.The influence of market demand upon innovation:a critical review of some recent empirical studies[J].Research policy,1979(8):102-153. [13]EDQUIST C,HOMMEN L.Systems of innovation:theory and policy for the demand side[J].Technology in society,1999,21(1):63-79. [14]王程韡,李振国.我们是否需要一种“需求侧创新政策”——来自“先进”国家的经验[J].科学学研究,2016(12):1789-1799. [15]张玉强,孙淑秋.“揭榜挂帅”:内涵阐释、实践探索与创新发展[J].经济体制改革,2021(6):13-19. [16]余江,陈凤,张越,等.铸造强国重器:关键核心技术突破的规律探索与体系构建[J].中国科学院院刊,2019,34(3):339-343. [17]曾婧婧,宋娇娇.科技悬赏制的项目“征集-定价”机制[J].科技管理研究,2015(20):181-186,202. [18]曾婧婧.科技悬赏制:理论、实践与案例[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2020. [19]LIOTARD I,REVEST V.Contests as innovation policy instruments:lessons from the US federal agencies' experience[J].Technological forecasting and social change,2018,127:57-69. [20]李凡,章东明,刘沛罡,等.技术创新政策比较研究框架构建及应用——基于金砖国家政策文本的分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2016(3):3-12. [21]曾婧婧.1567年以来世界主要科技悬赏奖研究[J].科研管理,2014(9):9-16. [22]MARK D.Innovation in firms[J].Oxford review of economic policy,2017(1):85-100. [23]EDLER J,FAGERBERG J.Innovation policy:what,why,and how[J].Oxford review of economic policy,2017,33(1):2-23. [24]CORREDOIRA R A,GOLDFARB B D,SHI Y.Federal funding and the rate and direction of inventive activity[J].Research policy,2018,47(9):1777-1800. [25]AAGAARD K.The evolution of a national research funding system:transformative change through layering and displacement[J].Minerva,2017,55(3):279-297. [26]GULBRANDSEN M,SMEBY J C.Industry funding and university professors'research performance[J].Research policy,2005,34(6):932-950. [27]江笑颜,李栋亮.多层次、智能化的项目评审专家管理体系构建研究——基于广东科研项目评审专家管理的优化[J].科技管理研究,2018,38(16):6.
2022, 
