适应与重构:校企创新主体资源融合路径研究

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (2)

全文: PDF (1160 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要校企协同创新主体适应性行为是实现资源融合的重要途径,资源融合重构和深化了校企创新主体之间的协同关系。基于适应性行为视角分析校企创新主体资源融合的内在逻辑,即资源融合的过程就是适应性行为的作用过程。而适应性行为建构创新主体资源融合的规则体系,同时适应性行为要嵌入到资源融合的规则体系中,并受规则体系所制约。然后基于扎根理论的探索性案例分析在适应性行为的作用下,创新资源需经历纳新、适应与再造3种状态,校企创新主体资源融合的过程就是在吸收、重构与再造的作用下螺旋式前进的过程。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	迟景明
	何声升
	张旭雯

关键词 ：适应性行为, 资源融合, 资源吸收, 资源重构, 资源再造

Abstract：The adaptive behavior of school-enterprise collaborative innovation subjects is an important way to achieve resource integration.The integration of resources reconstructs and deepens the synergy between school-enterprise innovation subjects.Based on the perspective of adaptive behavior,the internal logic of the resource integration of school-enterprise innovation subjects is analyzed,that is,the process of resource integration is the process of adaptive behavior.Adaptive behavior constructs a rule system of resource integration of innovative subjects,and at the same time,adaptive behavior should be embedded in the rule system of resource integration and be restricted by the rule system.Exploratory case analysis based on grounded theory is under the influence of adaptive behavior,innovation resources need to undergo three states including incorporation,adaptation,and reinvention.The process of integration of school-enterprise innovation subject resources is a spiraling process under the effect of absorption,reconstruction and reinvention.

Key words： Adaptive behavior Resource integration Resource absorption Resource reconstruction Resource reengineering

收稿日期: 2021-11-03

PACS:	G301
	G646

基金资助:国家社会科学基金一般项目“国家自主创新示范区产学研协同创新生态系统演化及治理研究”(18BGL271)。

通讯作者: 何声升

作者简介: 迟景明(1962-),男,吉林农安人,教授、博士生导师,研究方向为产学研创新生态系统演化与治理。

引用本文:

迟景明, 何声升, 张旭雯. 适应与重构:校企创新主体资源融合路径研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2022(9): 63-72.
Chi Jingming, He Shengsheng, Zhang Xuwen. Adaptation and Reconstruction:Research on the Resource Integration Path of School-Enterprise Innovation Subjects. , 2022(9): 63-72.

链接本文:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/CN/Y2022/I9/63

[1]张艺,许治,朱桂龙.协同创新的内涵、层次与框架[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(18):20-28.
[2]BEIRÃO G,PATRÍCIO L,FISK R P.Value cocreation in service ecosystems:investigating health care at the micro,meso,and macro levels[J].Journal of service management,2017,28(2):227-249.
[3]王新新,张佳佳.价值涌现:平台生态系统价值创造的新逻辑[J].经济管理,2021(2):188-208.
[4]陈劲.协同创新与国家科研能力建设[J].科学学研究,2011,29(12):2-3.
[5]付丙海,谢富纪,韩雨卿.创新链资源整合、双元性创新与创新绩效:基于长三角新创企业的实证研究[J].中国软科学,2015,300(12):176-186.
[6]GE B S,DONG B B.Resource integration process and venture performance:based on the contingency model of resource integration capability[C].International conference on management science & engineering.Long Beach,USA,2008.
[7]ZAHRA S A,NIELSEN A P.Sources of capabilities,integration and technology commercialization[J].Strategic management journal,2010,23(5):377-398.
[8]郭韬,李盼盼,乔晗.技术创业企业商业创新前因的组态效应[J].科研管理,2021,42(1):1-9.
[9]TEECE D J.Explicating dynamic capabilities:the nature and micro-foundations of enterprise performance[J].Strategic management journal,2007,28(13):1319-1350.
[10]董保宝,罗均梅,许杭军.新企业创业导向与绩效的倒U形关系——基于资源整合能力的调节效应研究[J].管理科学学报,2019,22(5):88-103.
[11]周丹.制造企业-知识型服务机构互动、资源重构与绩效研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2012.
[12]PENROSE E T.The theory of the growth of the firm[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1995.
[13]SIRMON D G,HITT M A,IRELAND R D.Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value:looking inside the black box[J].Academy of management review,2007,32(1):273-292.
[14]WIKLUND J,SHEPHERD D A.The effectiveness of alliances and acquisitions:the role of resource combination activities[J].Entrepreneurship theory and practice,2009,33(1):193-212.
[15]胡海青,张颖颖.创业苗圃资源搜寻对种子项目开发模糊前端绩效影响:适应性行为视角下的权变机理[J].管理评论,2018,30(8):102-114.
[16]NESS H,HAUGLAND S A,AARSTAD J.Interfirm resource integration in destination contexts[J].Current issues in tourism,2021,24(1):66-81.
[17]迟景明.资源与能力视角的大学组织创新模式研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2012.
[18]DUNNE C.The place of the literature review in grounded theory research[J].International journal of social research methodology,2011,14(2):111-124.
[19]GOLDKUHL G,CRONHOLM S.Reflection/Commentary on a past article:adding theoretical grounding to grounded theory:toward multi-grounded theory[J].International journal of qualitative methods,2018,17(1):1-5.
[20]THORNBERG R.Informed grounded theory[J].Scandinavian journal of educational research,2012,56(3):243-259.
[21]董保宝,葛宝山,王侃.资源整合过程、动态能力与竞争优势:机理与路径[J].管理世界,2011(3):92-101.
[22]GULATI R.Network location and learning:the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance form action[J].Strategic management journal,1999,20(5):397-420.
[23]姜骞,唐震.组织间网络、资源整合与SEMs战略适应能力[J].技术经济与管理研究,2016(9):62-66.
[24]VASUDEVA G,ANAND J.Unpacking absorptive capacity:a study of knowledge utilization from alliance portfolios[J].Academy of management journal,2011,54(3):611-623.
[25]BRUSH C G,GREENE P G,HART M.From initial idea to unique advantage:the entrepreneurial challenge of constructing a resource base[J].Academy of management executive,2001,15(1):64-78.
[26]WOGWU V E,HAMILTON D I.Reconfiguration capability and competitive advantage:a study of port harcourt public health sector[J].Management,2018,8(2):47-53.
[27]FERRERAS-MÉNDEZ J L,NEWELL S,FERNÁNDEZ-MESA A,et al.Depth and breadth of external knowledge search and performance:the mediating role of absorptive capacity[J].Industrial marketing management,2015,47(5):86-97.
[28]GREWAL R,TANSUHAJ P.Building organizational capabilities for managing economic crisis:the role of market orientation and strategic flexibility[J].Journal of marketing,2001,65(2):67-80.
[29]SOSNA M,TREVINYO-RODRÍGUEZ R N,VELAMURI S R.Business model innovation through trial-and-error learning:the naturhouse case[J].Long range planning,2010,43(2/3):383-407.
[30]张贵,温科,宋新平.创新生态系统:理论与实践[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2018.