Research on the Configuration Path of Innovation Vitality of Private Enterprises:From the Perspective of Business Environment
Li Yuanyuan1, Chai Yuchen1, Liu Jianhua2
1. School of Business Administration,Shanxi University of Finance and Economics,Taiyuan,Shanxi 030006,China; 2. Business School,Nankai University,Tianjin 300071,China
Abstract：In recent years,the lack of innovation vitality has become a key bottleneck restricting the development of private enterprises.As a breakthrough and focus of promoting the innovation of private enterprises,the business environment has been widely recognized by all sectors of society.However,what kind of business environment can stimulate the innovation vitality of private enterprises? This problem has not been solved effectively.This paper takes private listed companies as the research object,uses the method of fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis(fsQCA),and explores the path to enhance the innovation vitality of private enterprises under the configuration thinking from the perspective of business environment.This paper has the following research findings.①The elements of a single business environment do not constitute a necessary condition to enhance the innovation vitality of private enterprises.②There are four paths to stimulate the high innovation vitality of private enterprises,namely,the financial driving mode of relying on public services under the government-led logic,the financial driving mode under human and legal system,the innovation-driven mode of government and market dual logic relying on public services,and the innovation-driven mode under the market logic.③There are three paths to the driving mechanism that stimulate the innovation vitality of non-high private enterprises,and there is an asymmetrical causal relationship with the driving mechanism that enhances the innovation vitality of high private enterprises.The conclusions of the study help to promote the understanding of the finer-grained nature of business environment research,facilitate the continuous optimization of China's state-owned business environment,and provide theoretical reference and useful practical enlightenment for private enterprises to explore the driving path of innovation vitality.
李园园, 柴雨辰, 刘建华. 基于营商环境视角的民营企业创新活力组态路径研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2022(10): 95-103.
Li Yuanyuan, Chai Yuchen, Liu Jianhua. Research on the Configuration Path of Innovation Vitality of Private Enterprises:From the Perspective of Business Environment. , 2022(10): 95-103.
[1]任泽平,马家进,罗志恒.中国民营经济报告[R].北京:恒大研究院研究报告,2019. [2]王文涛,曹丹丹.互联网资本与民营经济高质量发展:基于企业创新驱动路径视角[J].统计研究,2020,37(3):72-84. [3]宋坤,田祥宇.国资驰援是“国进民退”还是“国进民进”——基于股权结构变动的分析[J].财经问题研究,2021(6):70-79. [4]高尚全.中国民营经济模式的焦点问题——“国进民退”的问题不在进退[J].人民论坛,2010(1):46. [5]李志军.中国城市营商环境评价[M].北京:中国发展出版社,2019. [6]杜运周,刘秋辰,程建青.什么样的营商环境生态产生城市高创业活跃度——基于制度组态的分析[J].管理世界,2020,36(9):141-155. [7]李志军.中国城市营商环境评价[M].北京:中国发展出版社,2020. [8]ZANG J,LIU L.Fiscal decentralization,government environmental preference,and regional environmental governance efficiency:evidence from China[J].The annals of regional science,2020,65(2):439-457. [9]WU L G.Capital misallocation in China:financial frictions or policy distortions[J].Journal of development economics,2018,130:203-223. [10]王永进,冯笑.行政审批制度改革与企业创新[J].中国工业经济,2018(2):24-42. [11]廖福崇.“互联网+政务服务”优化了营商环境吗——基于31省的模糊集定性比较分析[J].电子政务,2020(12):99-109. [12]张三保,曹锐.中国城市营商环境的动态演进、空间差异与优化策略[J].经济学家,2019(12):78-88. [13]杨进,张攀.地区法治环境与企业绩效——基于中国营商环境调查数据的实证研究[J].山西财经大学学报,2018,40(9):1-17. [14]TROILO M,WALKUP B R,ABE M,et al.Legal systems and the financing of working capital[J].International review of economics & finance,2019,64:641-656. [15]钱玉文.我国法治化营商环境构建路径探析——以江苏省经验为研究样本[J].上海财经大学学报,2020,22(3):138-152. [16]ANG J S,CHENG Y M,WU C P.Doesenforcement of intellectual property rights matter in China? Evidence from financing and investment choices in the high-tech industry[J].Review of economics and statistics,2014,96(2):332-348. [17]张光南,宋冉.中国交通对“中国制造”的要素投入影响研究[J].经济研究,2013,48(7):63-75. [18]赖永剑.基础设施建设与企业创新绩效[J].贵州财经大学学报,2013(3):70-76. [19]IM H J,PARK H,ZHAO G G.Uncertainty and the value of cash holdings[J].Economics letters,2017,155:43-48. [20]余明桂,钟慧洁,范蕊.民营化、融资约束与企业创新——来自中国工业企业的证据[J].金融研究,2019(4):75-91. [21]陈太义,王燕,赵晓松.营商环境、企业信心与企业高质量发展——来自2018年中国企业综合调查(CEGS)的经验证据[J].宏观质量研究,2020,8(2):110-128. [22]武力超,张馨月,童欢欢.金融服务部门开放对制造业企业技术创新的影响[J].财贸经济,2019,40(4):116-129. [23]ZUBAIR S,KABIR R,HUANG X.Does the financial crisis change the effect of financing on investment? Evidence from private SMEs-science direct[J].Journal of business research,2020,11(5):456-463. [24]郑馨,周先波,陈宏辉,等.东山再起:怎样的国家制度设计能够促进失败再创业——基于56个国家7年混合数据的证据[J].管理世界,2019,35(7):136-151,181. [25]BELENZON S,SCHANKERMAN M.Motivation and sorting of human capital in open innovation[J].Strategic management journal,2015,36(6):795-820. [26]肖振红,范君荻.科技人力资源投入对区域创新绩效的影响研究[J].科学学研究,2019,37(11):1944-1954. [27]AZAGRA-CARO J M,BARBERÁ D,SCHACHTER M E,et al.Dynamic interactions between university-industry knowledge transfer channels:a case study of the most highly cited academic patent[J].Research policy,2017,46(2):463-474. [28]ANDRIES P,CZARNITZKI D.Small firm innovation performance and employee involvement[J].Small business economics,2014,43(1):21-38. [29]程晨,王萌萌.企业劳动力成本与全要素生产率——“倒逼”机制的考察[J].南开经济研究,2016(3):118-132. [30]CIFTCI M,CREADY W M.Scale effects of R&D as reflected in earnings and returns[J].Journal of accounting & economics,2011,52(1):62-80. [31]KAISER U,KONGSTED H C,RONDE T,et al.Does themobility of R&D labor increase innovation[J].Social science electronic publishing,2015,11(6):91-105. [32]EGE A,EGE A Y.How to create afriendly environment for innovation? A case for Europe[J].Social indicators research,2019,144(1):451-473. [33]GLAESER E L,PONZETTO G A M,TOBIO K.Cities,skills and regional change[J].Regional studies,2014,48(1):7-43. [34]解维敏,桑凌.市场环境、参股银行业与企业银行贷款[J].系统工程理论与实践,2020,40(4):863-874. [35]王正新,周乾.营商环境如何影响中国企业对“一带一路”沿线国家直接投资[J].财经论丛,2019(9):42-52. [36]Ragin C C.Redesigning social inquiry:fuzzy sets and beyond[M].Illinois:University of Chicago Press,2008. [37]郭斌,丁鹏,靳雨涵,等.中国上市公司创新指数报告[R].深圳:深圳报业集团,2020. [38]FISS P C.Buildingbetter causal theories:a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research[J].Academy of management journal,2011,54(2):393-420. [39]SCHNEIDER C Q,WAGEMANN C.Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences:a guide to qualitative comparative analysis[J].International journal of social research methodology,2012,16(2):165-166.
2022, 
