State Assessment and Future Prediction of Basic Research in China: Based on Dynamic Monitoring of Innovation Performance and Development Potential of Basic Research in Different Regions From the Period of “11th Five-Year Plan”to “13th Five-Year Plan”
Wu Yang
School of Humanities and Social Science,Beijing Institute of Technology,Beijing 100081,China
Abstract：It is an urgent problem to monitor the dynamic change of basic research performance and evaluate the development potential of each region in the construction of basic research innovation system in China.This paper constructs three indicators named as basic research innovation performance value,reference index,and current index,and evaluates the basic research innovation capacity and future development potential of each region from the period of “11th Five-Year Plan”to “13th Five-Year Plan”through the quadratic relative evaluation method,and examines the impact of China's relevant policies on each region.The results showed the followings.Firstly,Beijing,Guangdong,Shanghai,Jiangsu and other regions have high innovation performance and fast development,and if resources are allocated to them,their innovation capacity will reach international leading position,and they should strive to make them “scientific highlands”.Secondly,Sichuan,Shandong,Zhejiang,Hubei and other regions have a good innovation foundation and great development potential.If policy guidance is in place,they will be the “reserve force”for basic research innovation in China.Thirdly,according to the development layout of China's three “Five-Year Plan”,China has formed an original innovation map with the east leading,the central part catching up differently,and the western part developing with characteristics.
吴杨. 中国基础研究状态评估与未来预测——基于 “十一五”至 “十三五”期间基础研究创新绩效与发展潜力的动态监测[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2022(11): 25-34.
Wu Yang. State Assessment and Future Prediction of Basic Research in China: Based on Dynamic Monitoring of Innovation Performance and Development Potential of Basic Research in Different Regions From the Period of “11th Five-Year Plan”to “13th Five-Year Plan”. , 2022(11): 25-34.
[1]李静海.抓住机遇推进基础研究高质量发展[J].中国科学院院刊,2019 (5):586-596. [2]黄卫.加强我国面向世界科技强国的基础研究基本布局和若干思考[J].中国软科学,2017 (8):1-8. [3]刘立.基础研究究竟是什么[J].科技中国,2020 (2):96-99. [4]HANS G,GERHARD S,CHRISTIAN A.Hierarchical growth:basic and applied research[J].Journal of economic dynamics and control,2018,90 (5):434-459. [5]HAMMERSTEDT R H,BLACH E L.Commercialization of basic research from within the university and return of value to the public[J].Animal reproduction science,2008,105 (1/2):158-178. [6]罗珵.基础研究投入对技术进步的影响:来自1998—2014年我国省级面板数据的实证分析[J].技术经济与管理研究,2019 (12):29-34. [7]李蕾蕾,黎艳,齐丹丹.基础研究是否有助于促进技术进步?——基于技术差距与技能结构的视角[J].科学学研究,2018 (1):37-48. [8]SALTER A J,MARTIN B R. The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research:a critical review[J].Research policy,2001,30 (3):509-532. [9]高杰,苏竣,谢其军.基于科学计量的中国基础研究创新团队合作网络演化与案例分析[J].创新科技,2020 (8):7-14. [10]COZZI G,GALLI S.Should the government protect its basic research[J].Economics letters,2017,157 (8):122-124. [11]TOOLE A A.The impact of public basic research on industrial innovation:evidence from the pharmaceutical industry[J].Research policy,2011,41 (1):1-12. [12]PRETTNER K,WERNER K.Why it pays off to pay us well:the impact of basic research on economic growth and welfare[J].Research policy,2016,45 (5):1075-1090. [13]张先恩,刘云,周程,等.基础研究内涵及投入统计的国际比较[J].中国软科学,2017 (5):131-148. [14]成力为,郭园园.中国基础研究投资的严峻态势及投资强度影响因素的跨国分析[J].研究与发展管理,2016 (5):63-70. [15]吴宪宇,程如烟,姜桂兴.国家基础研究经费投入规律研究[J].中国科技论坛,2020 (7):82-86,150. [16]张善良.科技创新视阈下基础研究创新成果的形成机理与创新生态模型[J].中国科技论坛,2020 (7):73-81. [17]吴杨,苏竣.高校基础研究投入与产出的相关性定量研究:1991-2008[J].高等教育研究,2011 (3):39-46. [18]邓衢文,刘敏,黄敏聪,等.我国及世界科技强国的基础研究经费投入特点与启示[J].世界科技研究与发展,2019 (2):137-147. [19]陶诚,张志强,陈云伟.关于我国建设基础科学研究强国的若干思考[J].世界科技研究与发展,2019,41 (1):1-15. [20]墨宏山.基础科学研究发展指数分析[J].科技管理研究,2019 (18):254-259. [21]吴杨,蔡青.中国基础研究创新效率的区域差异性评估[J].北京师范大学学报 (社会科学版),2018 (3):57-68. [22]朱军文,刘念才.我国高校基础研究产出变迁轨迹:1978-2009[J].高等教育研究,2010 (11):57-63. [23]陈凯华,张艺,穆荣平.科技领域基础研究能力的国际比较研究——以储能领域为例[J].科学学研究,2017 (1):34-44. [24]花芳,管楠祥,李风侠,等.文献计量方法在大学小团体层面的基础研究绩效评价的应用[J].图书情报工作,2017 (4):108-114. [25]欧阳峥峥,陈云伟,杨思飞,等.基于多维指标的省域基础研究发展现状分析[J].世界科技研究与发展,2020 (2):218-232. [26]吴杨,徐秀丽,沈梦玲. “双一流”建设大学基础研究创新效率测量及投入产出结构合理性研究:基于 “十一五”至 “十三五”期间数据观测[J].科技进步与对策,2020 (6):53-60. [27]何彬,罗洪群,王渝,等.基于DEA的科技计划项目绩效评价研究:以四川省应用基础研究项目为例[J].软科学,2020,34 (4):70-76. [28]姜群.基于DEA-malmquist的基础研究投入效率及其影响因素研究[J].科学管理研究,2019 (3):35-41. [29]王恒昕,孙倩,吴冲.基于AHP和群组决策DEA模型的高校科研管理效率评价[J].黑龙江高教研究,2018 (3):50-53. [30]任岁.基于二次相对评价模型的区域高校科研绩效量化评价研究[D].苏州:苏州大学,2016. [31]黄敏.基于数据包络分析法的教学管理二次相对评价法研究[J].价值工程,2012 (26):239-240. [32]中华人民共和国教育部科学技术司.高等学校科技统计资料汇编[G].北京:高等教育出版社,1998. [33]吴杨.加快健全基础科学研究评价体系[N].经济日报理论版,2020-03-19 (9). [34]王黎春,邵冰欣,翟媛媛,等.我国省域基础研究发展现状及能力提升策略[J].创新科技,2019 (8):23-31. [35]孙凯,钱昊.基础研究项目产出绩效的量化评价体系研究:以浙江省自然科学基金为例[J].科技管理研究,2016 (6):58-62. [36]杨中楷,徐梦真,韩爽.基础研究中产出的专利: “巴斯德式”专利视角[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2014 (12):56-61.
2022, 
