Research on Approaches to Key Core Technology Breakthrough Based on Quadruple Helix ——Taking the Innovation and Development of China's Long March Series Launch Vehicles as an Example
Wang Chengjun, Fang Ming, Hu Dengfeng
School of Administration Management,Anhui University of Finance and Economics,Bengbu 233030,China
Abstract：The paper adopts the exploratory single case research method,selects China's Long March series launch vehicles as the case study object,and uses the quadruple helix theory to analyze the function evolution mechanism between the innovation subjects of the Long March rockets in the R&D period,the market introduction period,the growth period and the mature period in order to answer why the Long March rocket related technology can come to the forefront of the world and how to catch up with and surpass it.The study finds the followings.Firstly,there are many reasons why the Long March rocket can catch up with and surpass in technology,including the unified leadership of the CPC and the government,adhering to independent innovation,establishing a national cooperation network,widely gathering talents and so on.Secondly,through the analysis of the R&D process of Long March rocket technology and the marketization process of rocket products,it can be seen that the organizational mode of technological innovation is contingent.Thirdly,it puts forward a dynamic four-fold spiral model for tackling key core technologies,that is,establishing a government-led prenatal R&D Alliance → establishing a technology update system with user participation → forming a two wheels drive pattern between enterprises and universities → forming a linkage mechanism between government,industry,university and public.Finally,it makes an in-depth analysis of the promoting role of the public in the process of quadruple helix innovation.The research results not only provide strategic in-depth thinking for revealing that the Long March rocket can continue to make technological breakthroughs,but also provide useful reference and management enlightenment for other key core technologies.
王成军, 方明, 胡登峰. 基于四重螺旋的关键核心技术攻关途径研究——以中国长征系列运载火箭创新发展为例[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2023(3): 49-61.
Wang Chengjun, Fang Ming, Hu Dengfeng. Research on Approaches to Key Core Technology Breakthrough Based on Quadruple Helix ——Taking the Innovation and Development of China's Long March Series Launch Vehicles as an Example. , 2023(3): 49-61.
[1]LEYDESDORFF L,ETZKOWITZ H.Can“The Public”be considered as a fourth helix in university-industry-government relations[J].Science & public policy,2003(1):55-61. [2]CARAYANNIS G,CAMPBELL D.Knowledge creation,difusion,and use in innovation networks and knowledge clusters[M].Westport:Praeger Publishers,2006. [3]CARAYANNIS G,CAMPBELL D.“Mode 3”and“Quadruple helix”:toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem[J].International journal of technology management 2009(3/4):201-234. [4]WALLINS.The co-evolvement in local development-From the triple to the quadruple helix model[C].Madrid:In VIII Triple Helix Conference,2010. [5]ARNKIL R,ANU J,PASI K,et al.Exploring Quadruple Helix:outlining user-oriented innovation models[R].Tampere:University of Tampere,2010. [6]CARAYANNIS G,CAMPBELL D.Quadruple and Quintuple Helix innovation systems and mode 3 knowledge production[M]//ELIAS G,DAVID F,CAMPBELL J,et al.Handbook of cyber-development,cyber-democracy,and cyber-defense.Cham:Springer,2017. [7]CARAYANNIS G,CAMPBELL D.Democracy ofclimate and climate for democracy:the evolution of quadruple and quintuple helix innovation systems[J].Journal of the knowledge economy,2021(4):56-72. [8]CARAYANNIS G,CAMPBELL D.Mode 3 knowledge production in Quadruple Helix innovation systems[M]//MARIOS P.Springer briefs in business.New York:Springer,2012. [9]IVANOVA I.Quadruple Helixsystems and symmetry[J].Journal of the knowledge economy,2014(2):357-369. [10]MILLER K,RODNEY M,MAURA M.A systematic literature review of university technologytransfer from a quadruple helix perspective[J].R&D management,2018(1):7-24. [11]LINDBERG M,MONICA L,JOHANN P.Quadruple Helix as away to bridge the gender gap in entrepreneurship[J].Journal of the knowledge economy,2014(1):94-113. [12]DOH P.A quadruple helix framework for university-led community innovation systems in Africa[M].Tampere:Tampere university Press,2018. [13]王成军,王德应.第四螺旋视域中的战略技术规制问题研究[J].汕头大学学报(人文社会科学版),2008(5):74-79,96. [14]王成军.社会创业:基于四重螺旋的捐赠大学研究[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2016. [15]王成军,方军.知识管理:基于四重螺旋的创新创业研究[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2020. [16]杨晓斐,武学超.“四重螺旋”创新生态系统构建研究[J].中国高校科技,2019(10):30-34. [17]西桂权,魏晨,付宏.面向科技服务业的四螺旋协同创新发展模型研究[J].科技管理研究,2020(23):31-37. [18]许礼刚,周怡婷,徐美娟.多元主体协同驱动下创新教育四螺旋模式研究[J].中国科技论坛,2021(12):134-141. [19]杨院,王天琦.以色列理工学院工程教育模式及启示:基于四重螺旋创新生态系统的分析[J].黑龙江高教研究,2022(3):63-68. [20]邹益民,张智雄.创新三螺旋模型的计量研究与实践进展[J].情报杂志,2013(4):85-90. [21]范柏乃,余钧.三重螺旋模型的理论构建、实证检验及修正路径[J].科学学研究,2014(10):1552-1558,1568. [22]廉思秋,高山行,舒成利,等.新型举国体制下构建触发中国高新技术突破的“扇形”模式研究[J].中国科技论坛,2021(11):149-157. [23]程郁,郑风田.产业集群与技术创新模式的协同演进机制[J].科学学研究,2009(10):1591-1598. [24]于洪方,陈岳飞.中国信息领域核心技术自主创新模式研究[J].现代雷达,2021(12):103-104. [25]林润辉,周常宝,李康宏,等.技术追赶过程中后发企业创新能力的构建[J].研究与发展管理,2016(1):40-51. [26]曾德麟,欧阳桃花.复杂产品后发技术追赶的主供模式案例研究[J].科研管理,2021(11):25-33. [27]唐春晖,唐要家.技术模式与中国产业技术追赶[J].中国软科学,2006(4):59-65. [28]曾宪奎.我国构建关键核心技术攻关新型举国体制研究[J].湖北社会科学,2020(3):26-33. [29]彭新敏,史慧敏,朱顺林.机会窗口、双元战略与后发企业技术追赶[J].科学学研究,2020(12):2220-2227,2257. [30]陶锋.代工模式的分工位置、组织特征与技术追赶[J].国际经贸探索,2011(5):25-32. [31]王刚,章博文,李显君.中国汽车企业技术追赶模式差异化的实证分析[J].技术经济,2014(8):10-15,34. [32]GIOIA D,CORLEY K,HAMILTON A.Seekingqualitative rigor in inductive research[J].Organizational research methods,2013(1):15-31. [33]周春彦,埃茨科威兹.双三螺旋:创新与可持续发展[J].东北大学学报(社会科学版),2006(3):170-174. [34]罗小芳,卢现祥.高质量发展中的创新组织方式转型研究[J].经济纵横,2018(12):34-41,2. [35]蒋敏,陈昭锋.我国企业自主创新的研发资源集聚模式[J].生产力研究,2009(3):147-148,162. [36]李云智.“后发优势”:理论基础、现实困境与破解路径[J].学习与探索,2021(2):17-22. [37]解学梅,余佳惠.用户参与产品创新的国外研究热点与演进脉络分析[J].南开管理评论,2021(5):4-17.
2023, 
