海归与高新技术企业国际化行为——基于中关村高新技术企业的实证分析

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1567 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要本文基于中关村海淀园高新技术企业的全面调查数据,运用面板双变量 Probit模型与混合Logit模型实证研究海归人数与高新技术企业国际化行为的关系。结果表明:①长期看,海归人数对企业出口和对外直接投资两种国际化行为均呈现正向促进作用;②短期内,受内外部因素影响,企业增加的海归人数正向促进了国际化行为;③两类不同企业的国际化行为决策方式略有差异,以对外直接投资为导向的企业更加灵活,以出口为导向的企业受更多方面因素影响。本文还讨论了内生性问题,并做了稳健性检验。创新点主要有:①综合考虑人财物国际化三方面,搭建统一框架进行机理和量化分析,选取面板双变量Probit模型以考察出口行为和对外直接投资行为的相关性;②进一步分解海归人数对高新技术企业国际化影响的因素,用混合Logit模型验证了长期因素、短期内外部因素的存在性与合理性;③基于中关村海淀园高新技术企业的面板微观数据具有优势。本文对企业国际化管理与国家政策制定提出相应建议,国际化竞争归根结底是国际化人才这种高端生产要素的竞争,在对外开放和国际竞争日趋激烈的背景下,吸引海归人才以助力高新技术企业国际化既有必要性,也有合理性。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	蔡国材
	王文静

关键词 ：海归, 高新技术企业, 国际化, 面板双变量Probit, 混合Logit

Abstract：This study investigates the relationship between returnees and the internationalization behavior of high-tech firms,based on the general survey data of high-tech firms in Zhongguancun Haidian Science Park.The panel bivariate Probit model and mixed Logit model are used in the empirical study.Results show that returnees play a positive role in promoting the internationalization of firms both in exporting and outward foreign direct investment in the long run.Moreover,the increment of returnees positively promotes internationalization behavior and plays a greater role in foreign direct investment firms.Furthermore,the internationalization behavior of the two different types of firms are different.The firms oriented by foreign direct investment are more flexible,and the export-oriented firms are affected by more factors.We also discuss the endogenous problem and make a robust test.The main innovation points are as follows.Firstly,this study considers three aspects of internationalization,sets up a unified framework for mechanism and quantitative analysis and selects the panel bivariate Probit model to identify the correlation between exporting behavior and outward foreign direct investment behavior.Secondly,this study further decomposes the influence of returnees on the internationalization of high-tech firms,and verifies the existence and rationality of long-term factors,external factors and internal factors with mixed Logit model.Thirdly,the general survey data of high-tech firms in Zhongguancun Haidian Science Park possesses superiority.This study puts forward corresponding suggestions on international management and policy formulation.International talents as high-end production factors is the root of international competition.Under the background of opening to the outside world and increasingly fierce international competition,it is necessary and reasonable to attract returnees to help high-tech firms internationalize.

Key words： Returnee High-tech firm Internationalization Panel bivariate random-effects Probit Model Mixed Logit model

收稿日期: 2022-04-28

PACS:	F125.5
	F272
	F276.44
	F114.4

基金资助:国家社会科学基金重大项目“新发展阶段军工企业高质量发展统计测度与实现路径研究”(21&ZD156),中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)项目(20XNH107)。

通讯作者: 王文静

作者简介: 蔡国材(1997—),男,福建泉州人,博士研究生,研究方向为经济统计学。

引用本文:

蔡国材, 王文静. 海归与高新技术企业国际化行为——基于中关村高新技术企业的实证分析[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2023(3): 115-128.
Cai Guocai, Wang Wenjing. Returnees and the Internationalization of High-Tech Firms——Empirical Analysis of High-Tech Firms in Zhongguancun Science Park. , 2023(3): 115-128.

链接本文:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/CN/Y2023/I3/115

[1]央广网.中国开放的大门不会关闭,只会越开越大[EB/OL].(2019-03-09)[2022-08-25].https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1627514344410374873&wfr=spider&for=pc.
[2]张潇文.探究国有企业“走出去”的国际化人才战略[J].商业文化,2022(7):17-19.
[3]于刃刚.西方经济学生产要素理论述评[J].河北经贸大学学报,2002,23(5):1-8.
[4]徐斌,李燕芳.生产要素理论的主要学派与最新发展[J].北京交通大学学报(社会科学版),2006(3):20-24.
[5]广州日报.《2020中国海归就业创业调查报告》发布,去年七成受访留学生打算回国发展[EB/OL].(2021-01-26)[2022-08-25].https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1689958660727980325&wfr=spider&for=pc.
[6]裴长洪,刘洪愧.中国外贸高质量发展:基于习近平百年大变局重要论断的思考[J].经济研究,2020,55(5):4-20.
[7]央广网.商务部:中国对外投资成为拉动全球对外直接投资增长的重要引擎[EB/OL].(2020-01-09)[2022-08-25].https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1655229243213540317&wfr=spider&for=pc.
[8]杨挺,陈兆源,韩向童.2019年中国对外直接投资特征、趋势与展望[J].国际经济合作,2020(1):13-29.
[9]许家云.海归与企业出口行为:来自中国的微观证据[J].金融研究,2018(2):118-134.
[10]张双兰.高管海外背景、技术创新与企业国际化绩效的关系研究[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆大学,2019.
[11]宋淑婵.海归高管对海外投资的影响研究[D].合肥:安徽大学,2020.
[12]郭怡辰.“海归”高管与企业国际化战略[D].重庆:重庆大学,2018.
[13]GOULD D M.Immigrant links to the home country:empirical implications for US bilateral trade flows[J].The review of economics and statistics,1994,76(2):302-316.
[14]PERI G,REQUENA-SILVENTE F.The trade creation effect of immigrants:evidence from the remarkable case of Spain[J].The Canadian journal of economics,2010,43(4):1433-1459.
[15]蒙英华,蔡宏波,黄建忠.移民网络对中国企业出口绩效的影响研究[J].管理世界,2015(10):54-64.
[16]FILATOTCHEV I,LIU X,BUCK T,etal.The export orientation and export performance of high-technology SMEs in emerging markets:the effects of knowledge transfer by returnee entrepreneurs[J].Journal of international business studies,2009,40(6):1005-1021.
[17]GUPTA A K,GOVINDARAJAN V.Cultivating a global mindset[J].The academy of management executive,2002,16(1):116-126.
[18]HERRMANN P,DATTA D K.Relationships between top management team characteristics and international diversification:an empirical investigation[J].British journal of management,2005,16(1):69-78.
[19]RODENBACH M,BRETTEL M.CEO experience as micro-level origin of dynamic capabilities[J].Management decision,2012,50(4):611-634.
[20]GIANNETTI M,LIAO G M,YU X Y.The brain gain of corporate boards:evidence from China[J].The journal of finance,2015,70(4):1629-1682.
[21]DAI Y,KONG D,LIU S.Returnee talent and corporate investment:evidence from China[J].European accounting review,2018,27(2):313-337.
[22]MUNDELL R A.International trade and factor mobility[J].The American economic review,1957,47(3):321-335.
[23]VERNON R A.International investment and international trade in the product cycle[J].The international executive,1966,8(4):16-16.
[24]小岛清.对外贸易论[M].周宝廉,译.天津:南开大学出版社,1987.
[25]LIPSEY R E,WEIAS M Y.Foreign production and exports in manufacturing industries[J].The review of economics and statistics,1981,63(4):488-494.
[26]HEAD K,RIES J.Overseas investment and firm exports[J].Review of international economics,2001,9(1):108-122.
[27]陈愉瑜.中国对外直接投资的贸易结构效应[J].统计研究,2012,29(9):44-50.
[28]张纪凤,黄萍.替代出口还是促进出口:中国对外直接投资对出口的影响研究[J].国际贸易问题,2013(3):95-103.
[29]顾雪松,韩立岩,周伊敏.产业结构差异与对外直接投资的出口效应:“中国—东道国”视角的理论与实证[J].经济研究,2016,51(4):102-115.
[30]闫周府,李茹,吴方卫.中国企业对外直接投资的出口效应:基于企业异质性视角的经验研究[J].统计研究,2019,36(8):87-99.
[31]MONTAGNA C.Efficiency gaps,love of variety and international trade[J].Economica,2001,68(269):27-44.
[32]MELITZ M J.The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity[J].Econometrica,2003,71(6):1695-1725.
[33]HELPMAN E,MELITZ M J,YEAPLE S R.Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms[J].American economic review,2004,94(1):300-316.
[34]田巍,余淼杰.企业生产率和企业“走出去”对外直接投资:基于企业层面数据的实证研究[J].经济学(季刊),2012,11(2):383-408.
[35]宫旭红,蒋殿春.生产率与中国企业国际化模式:来自微观企业的证据[J].国际贸易问题,2015(8):24-32.
[36]彼得·德鲁克.变动中的管理界[M].王喜六,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1999.
[37]彭剑锋,张望军.如何激励知识型员工[J].中国人力资源开发,1999,20(9):12-14.
[38]张望军,彭剑锋.中国企业知识型员工激励机制实证分析[J].科研管理,2001(6):90-96.
[39]江林.知识型员工的特点与管理[J].经济理论与经济管理,2002(9):58-62.
[40]万英.高新技术企业员工流动机理及控制策略分析[D].北京:北京交通大学,2008.
[41]张德.人力资源开发与管理[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1996.
[42]中松义郎.人际关系方程式[M].李相哲,译.桂林:漓江出版社,1990.
[43]李文.税收认知影响个人所得税的劳动供给效应吗:基于似不相关双变量Probit模型的分析[J].财贸研究,2018,29(9):66-75.
[44]胡新杰,赵波.我国正规信贷市场农户借贷约束研究:基于双变量Probit模型的实证分析[J].金融理论与实践,2013(2):12-17.
[45]李韬.粮食补贴政策增强了农户种粮意愿吗:基于农户的视角[J].中央财经大学学报,2014(5):86-94.
[46]黄惠春.农村土地承包经营权抵押贷款可得性分析:基于江苏试点地区的经验证据[J].中国农村经济,2014(3):48-57.
[47]朋文欢,傅琳琳.贫困地区农户参与合作社的行为机理分析:来自广西富川县的经验[J].农业经济问题,2018(11):134-144.
[48]张晋华,郭云南,黄英伟.社会网络对农户正规信贷的影响:基于双变量Probit模型和SEM模型的证据[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2017(6):83-93.
[49]范庆祝,孙祁祥.中国寿险市场存在逆向选择吗:来自CHARLS数据的经验证据[J].金融研究,2020(8):112-129.
[50]PLUM A.Bireprob:an estimator for bivariate random-effects probit models[J].The stata journal,2016,16(1):96-111.
[51]叶娇,赵云鹏,和珊.生产率、资本密集度对企业国际化模式选择决策的影响[J].统计研究,2018,35(1):32-42.
[52]陈强编著.高级计量经济学及Stata应用[M].第2版.北京:高等教育出版社,2014.
[53]WOOLDRIDGE J M.Econometric analsis of cross section and panel data[M].Cambridge:MIT Press,2002.