Investigation and Enlightenment on the National Defense Use Rules of Intellectual Property in the United States
Zengzhang xuyang1, Zeng Li2, Cao Debin3
1. Undergraduate School,National University of Defense Technology,Changsha 410073,China; 2. Institute for Defense Technology and Strategic Studies,National University of Defense Technology,Changsha 410073,China; 3. Department of Scientific Research,National University of Defense Technology,Changsha 410073,China
Abstract：As the world's leading military power,the United States,after nearly a century of exploration,has established rules for the use of intellectual property rights in national defense to balance national defense interests and private interests,and achieved remarkable results.This paper investigates the rules of national defense use of intellectual property in American national defense acquisition.Using the methods of content analysis and literature research,this paper analyzes the content and effectiveness of the national defense use rules of intellectual property in the United States on the basis of the historical investigation of the evolution and reform of the national defense use rules of intellectual property in the United States,in this way,the author also puts forward some practical lessons for China.The U.S.rules on the use of intellectual property for national defense exclude the interference of patent rights in the acquisition of national defense,which promotes the pendulum balance between national defense interests and private interests,as well as maintains the priority of national defense interests.At present,there is still a lack of rules for the use of intellectual property in national defense in China.We can establish rules for the use of intellectual property in national defense with Chinese characteristics by referring the useful experience of the United States and combining the actual situation in China,so as to promote the modernization of national defense and the armed forces.
曾张旭阳, 曾立, 曹德斌. 美国知识产权国防使用规则考察与镜鉴[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2023(3): 168-179.
Zengzhang xuyang, Zeng Li, Cao Debin. Investigation and Enlightenment on the National Defense Use Rules of Intellectual Property in the United States. , 2023(3): 168-179.
[1]赵黎明,孙健慧,张海波.基于微分博弈的军民融合协同创新体系技术共享行为研究[J].管理工程学报,2017,31(3):183-191. [2]郭永辉,冯媛.合作创新背景下的我国国防知识产权政策分析[J].中国科技论坛,2011(9):50-55. [3]旷毓君,纪建强.军民协同创新中知识产权归属问题研究[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(24):108-115. [4]United States Code.Title 28-judiciary and judicial procedure[EB/OL].[2022-02-23].https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2020-title28/pdf/USCODE-2020-title28-partIV-chap91-sec1498.pdf. [5]欧宁.知识产权与国防使用.北京:清华大学出版社,2019. [6]肖进,李丽梅.谈装备采购中专利管理的特殊规则[J].装备学院学报,2015,26(2):6-9. [7]杨成斌,孙胜祥,魏华.装备采购中的成本节约型知识产权定价:一种基于三方共赢理念的使用费确定方法[J].科技管理研究,2019,39(21):167-171. [8]王波,张伟,张敬钦.国防知识产权垄断性与装备采购竞争性矛盾问题探索研究[J].科学管理研究,2021,39(1):11-16. [9]邝溯琼,邓冠前,汪恒,等.基于模拟谈判的装备采购合同知识产权条款拟制研究[J].国防科技,2021,42(2):73-76. [10]付丽霞.美国专利制度演进的历史梳理与经验借鉴[J].中国发明与专利,2018,15(10):28-34. [11]Library of Congress.U.S.Reports:United States v.Palmer,128 U.S.262(1888)[EB/OL].[2022-02-23].tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep128/usrep128262/usrep128262.pdf. [12]Library of Congress.U.S.Reports:Schillinger v.United States,155 U.S.163(1894)[EB/OL].[2022-02-24].tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep155/usrep155163/usrep155163.pdf. [13]U.S.Government Publishing Office.Congress record 1910[EB/OL].[2022-02-24].https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-CRECB-1910-pt8-v45/pdf/GPO-CRECB-1910-pt8-v45-9-2.pdf. [14]ROBINSON A.Birdmen:the Wright brothers,Glenn Curtiss,and the battle to control the skies[J].Engineering & technology,2014,9(7):95-95. [15]ROLAND A.Model research:the national advisory committee for aeronautics 1915—1958.NASA SP4103[J].Technology and Culture,1985,4103(3). [16]TOM D C.Wings:a history of aviation from kites to the space age[M].New York:W.W.Norton & Company,2003:147. [17]President Woodrow Wilson Executive Order.Naval service appropriations act[EB/OL].[2022-02-24].www.history.navy.mil/research/publications/documentary-histories/wwi/august-1917/president-woodrow-wi-0.html. [18]Library of Congress.U.S.Reports:Cramp & Sons v.Curtis Turbine Co.,246 U.S.28(1917)[EB/OL].[2022-03-02].tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep246/usrep246028/usrep246028.pdf. [19]U.S.Government Publishing Office.Congress record 1918[EB/OL].[2022-02-24].https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-CRECB-1918-pt8-v56/pdf/GPO-CRECB-1918-pt8-v56-12.pdf. [20]ROOSEVELT F D.Recommendations to the congress to curb monopolies and the concentration of economic power[EB/OL].[2022-03-04].https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?type=simple&c=ppotpus&rgn=full+text&q1=Recommendations+to+the+Congress+to+Curb+Monopolies+and+the+Concentration+of+Economic+Power&Submit=Search. [21]United States Senate.Reprinted in 1 Hearings on S.2303[EB/OL].[2022-03-05].https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/001511288. [22]GERALD J M,ROBERT F A.Patent infringement in government procurement:a remedy without a right[EB/OL].[2022-06-15].https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3124&context=ndlr. [23]ADAMCZYK J,LEWIS A,MORRISON S.A guide to government patent use,a path to licensing and distributing generic drugs[EB/OL].[2022-06-16].https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3882823. [24]WATKINS M.Kentucky Gov.Andy Beshear calls on 3M to release patent for N95 respirator amid pandemic[EB/OL].[2022-06-16].https://www.courier-journal.com/story/news/2020/04/03/beshear-calls-3-m-release-patent-n-95-respirator-amid-pandemic/5112729002/. [25]MORTEN C,DUAN C.Who′s afraid of section 1498? A case for government patent use in pandemics and other national crises[J].SSRN electronic journal,2020(6). [26]王金强.知识产权保护与美国的技术霸权[J].国际展望,2019,11(4):115-134,156-157. [27]Library of Congress.U.S.Reports:Richmond Co.v.United States,275 U.S.331(1928)[EB/OL].[2022-06-15].tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep275/usrep275331/usrep275331.pdf. [28]张丽娜,谭章禄.协同创新与知识产权的冲突分析[J].科技管理研究,2013,33(6):163-166. [29]傅广宇.利益法学[J].比较法研究,2006(6):145-158. [30]马波,何迎春.国家财政资助项目科技成果权属的历史沿革、制度障碍和解决方案[J].中国科技论坛,2020(11):48-55. [31]刘昊,张志强.建立军民融合一体化专利管理体制的思考:基于首批解密国防专利的分析[J].情报杂志,2017,36(10):110-116. [32]易继明.知识产权强国建设的基本思路和主要任务[J].知识产权,2021(10):13-40.
2023, 
