Distribution and Evolution Analysis of Digital Platform Patent Technology
Hua Lianlian1,2,3, Han Junmin1, Liu Yanqiu1,3, Peng Jia1,3
1. School of Economics and Management, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Hohhot 010051, China; 2. School of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; 3. Inner Mongolia Manufacturing Resource Planning Application Research Center, Hohhot 010051, China
Abstract：In order to deeply and comprehensively explore the distribution and evolution characteristics of patent technology of digital platform, based on the patent retrieval data of China, the United States, Japan, South Korea, Europe and other countries and regions from 2004 to 2021, this paper starts from the perspective of patent quantity, patent value and patentee distribution.With the help of social network analysis and visual analysis of Gephi software, the paper makes a comprehensive analysis on the evolution of global digital platform patent technology, such as subject evolution, country independent technology evolution and joint technology evolution.The results show the followings.①Huawei shows the strongest R&D vitality, but there is a gap between China's digital platforms and the United States in the number of patent grants, patent value level and focus areas, and more R&D forces need to be absorbed to create digital clusters.②The global digital platform has experienced a stage theme evolution process of“basic technology R&D-parts production-transformation of traditional industries-intelligent construction”.The technological evolution of China, the United States and Europe is more specific, while Japan and South Korea are relatively scattered.Among them, the focus area of China and the United States has a transition period, while the United States“corrects”this deviation earlier than China and continues to conduct in-depth technological exploration in the field of communication.China should maintain the momentum of research and development in the field of communications to strengthen the technological base of digital platforms.③The characteristics of joint distribution network of patent technology of Digital platform in China are emerging, but the trend of large-scale joint is not yet formed.China should enhance the compatibility and integration of technologies, drive the interaction and integration of innovation achievements between core and edge subjects, and create a strategic map with unique competitive advantages in the new round of digital platform innovation.
华连连, 韩俊敏, 刘艳秋, 彭佳. 数字平台专利技术分布及其演进分析[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2023(4): 43-52.
Hua Lianlian, Han Junmin, Liu Yanqiu, Peng Jia. Distribution and Evolution Analysis of Digital Platform Patent Technology. , 2023(4): 43-52.
[1]王海军,金姝彤.如何驱动企业颠覆性创新:模块化数字平台视角的探讨[J].中国科技论坛,2020(10):14-16. [2]United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.Digital economy report 2019[R/OL].https://unctad.org/topic/ecommerce-and-digital-economy/digital-economy-report. [3]王晓红,朱福林,夏友仁.“十三五”时期中国数字服务贸易发展及“十四五”展望[J].首都经济贸易大学学报,2020,22(6):28-42. [4]中国信息通信研究院.全球数字治理白皮书(2020 年)[EB/OL].http://www.caict.ac.cn/kxyj/qwfb/bps/202012/ t202012- 15_366184.htm. [5]LI L,SU F,ZHANG W,et al.Digital transformation by SME entrepreneurs:a capability perspective[J].Information systems journal,2018,28(6):1129-1157. [6]CUSUMANO M A,YOFFIE D B.What netscape learned from cross-platform software development[J].Communications of the ACM,1999,42(10):72-78. [7]AHMAD G,OLA H.Governing third-party development through platform boundary resources(2010)[C].ICIS 2010 Proceedings,Paper 48. [8]AHMAD G,OLA H.Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development:the boundary resources model[J].Information systems journal,2013,23(2):173-192. [9]宋华.数字平台赋能的供应链金融模式创新[J].中国流通经济,2020,34(7):17-24. [10]刘洋,董久钰,魏江.数字创新管理:理论框架与未来研究[J].管理世界,2020,36(7):198-219. [11]缪沁男,魏江,杨升曦.服务型数字平台的赋能机制演化研究:基于钉钉的案例分析[J].科学学研究,2022,40(1):182-192. [12]张化尧,薛珂,徐敏赛,等.商业孵化型平台生态系统的价值共创机制:小米案例[J].科研管理,2021,42(3):71-79. [13]朱春阳,毛天婵.论互联网平台治理的现代化转型:以腾讯为例的考察[J].现代出版,2021(1):43-47. [14]贾瑞雪.平台社会中个人数据的开放关系研究:基于国内80个应用平台(APP)的参与式观察[J].情报理论与实践,2021,44(5):66-77,121. [15]罗立国,余翔,郑婉婷,等.专利检索网站比较研究[J].情报杂志,2012,31(3):163-167. [16]GB/T 36622.1—2018.智慧城市 公共信息与服务支撑平台 第1部分:总体要求[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2018. [17]GB/T 36622.2—2018.智慧城市 公共信息与服务支撑平台 第2部分:目录管理[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2018. [18]GB/T 36622.3—2018.智慧城市 公共信息与服务支撑平台 第3部分:测试要求[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2018. [19]ISO/IEC DIS 30145-1-2020.Information technology-smart city ICT reference framework-part 1:smart city business process framework[S].Geneva:ISO Copyright Office,2020. [20]ISO/IEC 30145-2-2020.Information technology-smart city ICT reference framework-part 2:smart city knowledge management framework[S].Geneva:ISO Copyright Office,2020. [21]ISO/IEC 30145-3-2020,Information technology-smart city ICT reference framework-part 3:smart city engineering framework[S].Geneva:ISO Copyright Office,2020. [22]LIAO H C,LI X F,TANG M.How to process local and global consensus? A large-scale group decision making model based on social network analysis with probabilistic linguistic information[J].Information sciences,2021,579(11):368-387. [23]刘勇,杜一.网络数据可视化与分析利器:Gephi中文教程(全彩)[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2017:293-312. [24]DE N W,MRVAR A,BATAGEL V.Exploratory network analysis with Pajek[M].London:Cambridge University Press,2005:27-130. [25]孙江华,颜诗烬.社交网络特征对微博营销效果的影响:基于电影官方微博面板数据实证研究[J].商业研究,2017(2):12-18. [26]TEUTLE A R M.Twitter:network properties analysis[C].2010 20th International Conference on Electronics,Communications and Computer(CONIELECOMP),2010,18:180-186. [27]郑夕玉.互联网时代我国数字经济发展策略研究:基于美国和欧盟发展经验的启示[J].西南金融,2019(12):53-60. [28]谷丽,郝涛,任立强,等.专利质量评价指标相关研究综述[J].科研管理,2017,38(S1):27-33. [29]丁礼谦,张建辉,杨萌,等.面向智能船舶相关技术的专利分析研究[J].科技管理研究,2020,40(3):107-114. [30]张米尔,李海鹏,国伟.国别专利制度下的专利产出和权利人差异研究[J].科学学研究,2019,37(12):2140-2148. [31]李随成,杨婷.研发合作企业间知识共享与合作绩效的关系[J].科技进步与对策,2007(10):180-184. [32]李冰,张纪海.军民科技创新合作网络结构与演化:基于专利合作与社会网络实证分析[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(21):142-151. [33]张向阳.构建基于产业链集群的开放式创新平台,促进科技型中小企业创新发展[J].中国科技论坛,2021(6):11-14. [34]高霞,陈凯华.基于SIPO专利的产学研合作模式及其合作网络结构演化研究:以ICT产业为例[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2016,37(11):34-43. [35]何文彬.全球价值链视域下数字经济对我国制造业升级重构效应分析[J].亚太经济,2020(3):115-130,152. [36]YANG G C,LI G,LI C Y,et al.Using the comprehensive patent citation network(CPC)to evaluate patent value[J].Scientometrics,2015,105(3):1319-1346.
2023, 
