Research on the Characteristics of China's Outstanding Young Scientific and Technological Talents——Take the Winners of MIT TR35 China as an Example
Song Yonghui1,2, Ma Tingcan1,2,3, Yue Mingliang1,2,3
1. Wuhan Library of Chinese Academy of Science,Wuhan 430071,China; 2. Department of Information Resources Management,School of Economics and Management,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China; 3. Hubei Key Laboratory of Big Data in Science and Technology,Wuhan 430071,China
Abstract：The MIT Technology Review“35 Under 35”China winners from 2017 to 2021 were used to study the characteristics of China's outstanding young scientific and technological talents and to provide a reference for the national improvement of the young scientific and technological talents training model.The study was conducted to investigate the characteristics of the winners in terms of basic characteristics,education experience,work experience,and representative scientific and technological achievements,and to explore the growth characteristics and representative scientific and technological achievements of the winners by using biographical analysis and webometrics.The study found that:young scientists and female scientists need more oriented research funding in their early growth stage;high-level education and overseas training experience are the“cradle”for outstanding young scientists;top universities/institutes and economically developed regions are the gathering places for outstanding young scientists to choose their future career development;typical young scientists'scientific achievements are spread across multiple frontier sciences.The typical young science and technology talents'scientific and technological achievements are in many frontier scientific fields,but the scientific and technological achievements of Chinese young science and technology talents in different periods are in different disciplines.2017—2018 winners'representative scientific and technological achievements are concentrated in the fields of computer science and technology,quantum physics,and biomaterials;2019—2021 winners focus more on biomedicine,artificial intelligence,biomaterials,quantum information,and other frontier scientific fields.and other frontier science fields.
宋永辉, 马廷灿, 岳名亮. 中国优秀青年科技人才特征研究——以MIT TR35中国区获奖者为例[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2023(5): 99-109.
Song Yonghui, Ma Tingcan, Yue Mingliang. Research on the Characteristics of China's Outstanding Young Scientific and Technological Talents——Take the Winners of MIT TR35 China as an Example. , 2023(5): 99-109.
[1]GAUGHAN M,ROBIN S.National science training policy and early scientific careers in France and the United States[J].Research policy,2004,33(4):569-581. [2]李奕嬴,朱军文.经济学国际学术奖项的类别、相互关系及影响力高低的图谱分析[J].情报杂志,2017,36(5):82-89. [3]许合先.诺贝尔自然科学奖领域知识与人才的传承规律及启示[J].科技管理研究,2008(6):503-505. [4]任晓亚,张志强,陈云伟.杰出科学家的科研产出规律——以拉斯克医学研究奖得主为例[J].情报学报,2019,38(9):894-906. [5]麻省理工科技评论.科技之巅2[M].北京:人民邮电出版社,2017. [6]CANIBANO C,OTAMENDI F J,SOLIS F.International temporary mobility of researchers:a cross-discipline study[J].Scientometrics,2011,89(2):653-675. [7]GERLESE A.Academic growth and development:how do university academics experience it[J].Higher education,2005,50(1):1-32. [8]MONICA G,STEPHANE R.National science training policy and early scientific careers in France and the United States[J].Research policy,2011,33(4):569-581. [9]CONFRARIA H,BLANCKENBERG J,SWART C.The characteristics of highly cited researchers in Africa[J].Research evaluation,2018,27(3):222-237. [10]BORNMANN L,BAUER J,SCHLAGBERGER E.Characteristics of highly cited researchers 2015 in Germany[J].Scientometrics,2017,111(1):543-545. [11]白春礼.杰出科技人才的成长历程[M].北京:科学出版社,2007. [12]王佳匀,于璇,汪雪锋,等.优秀青年科技人才成长典型特征分析:以优秀青年科学基金获资助者为例[J].中国科学基金,2021,35(2):290-297. [13]姜璐,董维,刘晓光.拔尖创新学术人才的成长规律研究:基于青年“长江学者”群体状况的计量分析[J].中国大学教学,2018(1):87-91. [14]柏璐,高耀明.杰出女性科技工作者的教育背景和成长环境探析——以国家杰出青年科学基金女性获得者为例[J].高等教育研究,2018,39(4):59-65. [15]鲍雪莹,陈贡,刘木林.基于履历信息的国际科技人才特征分析——以近十年诺贝尔物理、化学、生理或医学奖得主为例[J].现代情报,2014,34(9):4-9. [16]黄涛,黄文龙.杰出科技人才成长的“四优环境”——以23位“两弹一星”功勋科学家群体为例[J].自然辩证法研究,2015,31(7):59-64. [17]高瑞,王彬.中国杰出青年科技人才的成长过程及特征:基于“科学探索奖”获得者的履历分析[J].科学管理研究,2022,40(2):139-146. [18]屠海令,孙棕檀,姚源,等.近六年《麻省理工科技评论》“全球十大突破性技术”解析与启示[J].中国工程科学,2017,19(5):85-91. [19]祝叶华.MIT榜单发布,“爆料”新兴科技趋势——《麻省理工科技评论》2017年全球十大突破性技术解读[J].科技导报,2017,35(7):12-16. [20]姜念云.2020年世界科技发展热点:基于《麻省理工科技评论》相关资讯的计量分析[J].科技中国,2021(3):7-11. [21]麻省理工科技评论.《麻省理工科技评论》[EB/OL].(2022-03-18)[2022-07-05].https://tr35.mittrchina.com/. [22]张建卫,王健,周洁,等.高校高层次领军人才成长的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2019,37(2):235-244. [23]邱均平,张洋.网络信息计量学综述[J].高校图书馆工作,2005(1):1-12. [24]邱均平.信息计量学第一讲:信息计量学的兴起和发展[J].情报理论与实践,2000(1):75-80. [25]邱均平,陈敬全.网络信息计量学及其应用研究[J].情报理论与实践,2001(3):161-163. [26]王知津,闫永君.网络计量法与内容分析法比较研究[J].图书馆学研究,2006(6):2-5. [27]乔锦忠,陈秀凤,张美琦.高等教育经历、早期工作经历、首篇论文对高层次人才“蛰伏期”的影响研究[J].学位与研究生教育,2020(2):44-53. [28]中国学位与研究生教育信息网.学科专业目录名单[EB/OL].(2022-03-18)[2022-07-06].http://www.cdgdc.edu.cn/xwyyjsjyxx/sy/glmd/264462.shtml. [29]赵红州.科学能力学引论[M].北京:科学出版社,1984.
2023, 
