Incentive Policy for the Transformation of Scientific and Technological Achievements in China:Policy Instrument Characteristics,Discourse Changes and Evolution
Ping Xian1, Wei Huai'an1, Tan Zhifang2, Wu Haofu3
1. School of Public Administration,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430074,China; 2. Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics,Wuhan 430074,China; 3. Zhejiang Provincial Energy Company LTD.Hangzhou 310007,China
Abstract：Based on the three-dimensional policy analysis framework,this study analyzes the basic instrumental application characteristics,the discourse changes and the evolution logic of the incentive policy in the transformation of scientific and technological achievements in China during the period 2006—2022 by manual coding,identifying co-words networks,the discourse changes and evolution over time within 502 documents.For this purpose,the combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis i.e.content analysis and co-words analysis are being applied.The study finds that the instrumental application characteristics of the incentive policy differ from single and compound dimensions,and the incentive policy can be generally divided into 3 periods named as the period of incentive effectiveness implementation,the period of incentive breakthrough and the period of incentive system synergy.The policy discourse has shifted in different periods,and there are distinct dynamic patterns in incentive goals,incentive tools,incentive subjects and incentive efficacy,while three pairs of interactions,namely,local policy absorption and policy innovation,transformation of scientific and technological achievements and national innovation system construction,and change in value temperature of policy incentives and government attention,are the internal logic driving the policy evolution.
[1]吕薇,马名杰,戴建军,等.转型期我国创新发展的现状、问题及政策建议[J].中国软科学,2018(3):10-17. [2]胡曙虹,黄丽,杜德斌.全球科技创新中心建构的实践——基于三螺旋和创新生态系统视角的分析:以硅谷为例[J].上海经济研究,2016(3):21-28. [3]RADWAN A.Science and innovation policies in North African countries:exploring challenges and opportunities[J].Entrepreneurship and sustainability issues,2018,6(1):268-282. [4]SALAMI R,SOLTANZADEH J.Comparative analysis for science,technology and innovation policy[J].Journal of technology management & innovation,2012,7(1):211-227. [5]VIGLIONI M T D,DE BRITO M J,CALEGARIO C L L.Innovation and R&D in Latin America and the Caribbean countries:a systematic literature review[J].Scientometrics,2020,125(3):2131-2167. [6]MOLAS-GALLART J,DAVIES A.Toward theory-led evaluation:the experience of European science,technology,and innovation policies[J].American journal of evaluation,2006,27(1):64-82. [7]SALAS G E,VAN EST R,VERBONG G.Transforming mobility:the Dutch smart mobility policy as an example of a transformative STI policy[J].Science and public policy,2019,46(6):820-833. [8]BURMAOGLU S,SARITAS O.An evolutionary analysis of the innovation policy domain:is there a paradigm shift[J].Scientometrics,2019,118(3):823-847. [9]BROWNE J,COFFEY B,COOK K.A guide to policy analysis as a research method[J].Health promotion international,2019,34(5):1032-1044. [10]李亚,尹旭,何鉴孜.政策话语分析:如何成为一种方法论[J].公共行政评论,2015,8(5):55-73,187-188. [11]郑代良,钟书华.1978—2008:中国高新技术政策文本的定量分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2010,31(4):176-181. [12]卢章平,王晓晶.国家和地方科技成果转化政策对比分析[J].图书情报工作,2012,56(24):83-88. [13]杜伟锦,宋园,李靖,等.科技成果转化政策演进及区域差异分析——以京津冀和长三角为例[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2017,38(2):3-11. [14]郭英远,张胜.科技人员参与科技成果转化收益分配的激励机制研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015,36(7):146-154. [15]陈刚,马扬,张玉璐.科技成果转化的激励研究[J].科学学研究,2002(5):525-528. [16]贺德方.对科技成果及科技成果转化若干基本概念的辨析与思考[J].中国软科学,2011(11):1-7. [17]ROTHWELL R,ZEGVELD W.Reindusdalization and technology[M].London:Logman Group Limited,1985. [18]胡振亚.论科技成果转化的实施主体、转化模式和激励机制[J].求索,2012(12):173-175. [19]王雪原,武建龙,董媛媛.基于技术成熟度的成果转化过程不同主体行为研究[J].中国科技论坛,2015(6):49-54. [20]黄萃,任弢,张剑.政策文献量化研究:公共政策研究的新方向[J].公共管理学报,2015,12(2):129-137,158-159. [21]黄萃,吕立远.文本分析方法在公共管理与公共政策研究中的应用[J].公共管理评论,2020,2(4):156-175. [22]白冠男,钮文异,王玉凤.注意缺陷多动障碍儿童服药依从性的定性研究[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2013,27(7):529-533. [23]孙佼佼,谢彦君.矛盾的乌托邦:邮轮旅游体验的空间生产:基于扎根理论的质性分析[J].旅游学刊,2019,34(11):41-50. [24]黄新平,黄萃,苏竣.基于政策工具的我国科技金融发展政策文本量化研究[J].情报杂志,2020,39(1):130-137. [25]冯璐,冷伏海.共词分析方法理论进展[J].中国图书馆学报,2006(2):88-92. [26]MIGUEL S,CAPRILE L,JORQUERA-VIDAL I.Análisis de co-términos y de redes sociales para la generación de mapas temáticos[J].El profesional de la informacion,2008,17(6):637-647. [27]张宝建,李鹏利,陈劲,等.国家科技创新政策的主题分析与演化过程:基于文本挖掘的视角[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2019,40(11):15-31. [28]梁正.从科技政策到科技与创新政策:创新驱动发展战略下的政策范式转型与思考[J].科学学研究,2017,35(2):170-176. [29]夏太寿,张玉赋,高冉晖,等.我国新型研发机构协同创新模式与机制研究:以苏粤陕6家新型研发机构为例[J].科技进步与对策,2014,31(14):13-18. [30]郭淑芬,张俊.中国31个省市科技创新效率及投入冗余比较[J].科研管理,2018,39(4):55-63. [31]刘琼,梁凤波.基于注意力竞争理论的地方政府“政策响应差异”分析:以医疗保险支付方式改革为例[J].甘肃行政学院学报,2019(3):39-49,126-127. [32]康治平,付媛,唐旭,等.赋予科研人员职务科技成果所有权或长期使用权实施路径探究[J].中国科技论坛,2022(3):17-24. [33]姜晓萍,李敏.治理韧性:新时代中国社会治理的维度与效度[J].行政论坛,2022,29(3):5-12. [34]黄健荣.政府决策注意力资源论析[J].江苏行政学院学报,2010(6):101-107. [35]陈那波,张程.领导重视什么及为何——省级党政决策的注意力分配研究:基于2010—2017年省委机关报的省级领导批示[J].公共管理与政策评论,2022,11(4):85-102.
2023, 
