Abstract：The uncertainty of geopolitical influence and differences in economic levels increase the policy space for countries to take protectionist measures,and the cybersecurity threats in the field of digital trade are increasing day by day.A country's cybersecurity measures may violate the commitments of the World Trade Organization(WTO)and Free Trade Agreement(FTA),but can provide a legal basis for its domestic policy according to the security exception or general exception clause.The main challenges related to cybersecurity in digital trade include,but are not limited to,differences in data privacy protection,restrictions on cross-border data flows and disorderly expansion of data jurisdiction.Under the background of social governance innovation in the Internet era,the governance subject has changed from the“dual”of public-private partnership governance to the“pluralistic”pattern of co-governance of multiple subjects,which can respond to relevant challenges in cybersecurity governance.Our government should build a multi-subject co-governance cybersecurity system for multinational enterprises,put forward countermeasures related to cybersecurity in digital trade on the basis of maintaining cybersecurity and national security,and speed up the construction of a community with a shared future in cyberspace.
朱明婷. 数字贸易中有关网络安全的主要挑战、治理进路及对策[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2023(7): 106-115.
Zhu Mingting. The Main Challenges,Governance Approaches and Countermeasures of Cybersecurity in Digital Trade. , 2023(7): 106-115.
[1]鄢雨虹.数据跨境流动规制中的正当公共政策目标例外及中国因应[J].兰州学刊,2022,342(3):106-119. [2]MISHRA N.International trade law meets data ethics:a brave new world[J].New York university journal of international law and politics,2021,53(2):303-380. [3]崔宏伟.“数字技术政治化”与中欧关系未来发展[J].国际关系研究,2020,47(5):21-40,155. [4]孙南翔.CPTPP数字贸易规则:制度博弈、规范差异与中国因应[J/OL].学术论坛:1-10[2022-07-11].DOI:10.16524/j.45-1002.20220701.001. [5]MISHRA N.Privacy,cybersecurity,and GATS Article XIV:a new frontier for trade and internetregulation[J].World trade review,2020,19(3):341-364. [6]郭锋.证券法律评论(2019年卷)[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2019. [7]付伟,杨晓波.跨国公司的跨境数据治理挑战与对策建议[J].中国信息安全,2022,148(3):67-69. [8]孙方江.跨境数据流动:数字经济下的全球博弈与中国选择[J].西南金融,2021,474(1):3-13. [9]张瑜,高拓.制与反制:应对美国金融制裁[J].中国外汇,2020,405(15):23-26. [10]刘天骄.数据主权与长臂管辖的理论分野与实践冲突[J].环球法律评论,2020,42(2):180-192. [11]敖海静.数据保护的国际软法之道[J].法商研究,2022,39(2):158-172. [12]杨永红.美国域外数据管辖权研究[J].法商研究,2022,39(2):146-157. [13]叶开儒.数据跨境流动规制中的“长臂管辖”——对欧盟GDPR的原旨主义考察[J].法学评论,2020,38(1):106-117. [14]HARLOW C.Global administrative law:the quest for principles and values[J].European journal of international law,2006,17:187-214. [15]HUANG K, MADNICK S, ZHANG F,et al.Varieties of public-private co-governance on cybersecurity within the digital trade:implications from Huawei's 5G[J].Journal of Chinese governance,2022,7(1):81-110. [16]黄家星.国际数字贸易规则碎片化:现状、成因及应对[J].太平洋学报,2022,30(4):70-82. [17]杨帆.后“Schrems Ⅱ案”时期欧盟数据跨境流动法律监管的演进及我国的因应[J].环球法律评论,2022,44(1):178-192. [18]FJELD J, ACHTEN N,HILLIGOSS H et al.Principled artificial intelligence:mapping consensus in ethical and rights-based approaches to principles for AI[R].Berkman klein center for internet society,2020. [19]MITCHELL A D, MISHRA N.Data at the docks:modernizing international trade law for the digital economy[J].Vanderbilt journal of entertainment and technology law,2018,20(4):1073-1134. [20]张丽娟,郭若楠.国际贸易规则中的“国家安全例外”条款探析[J].国际论坛,2020,22(3):66-79,157-158. [21]蔡翠红,王远志.全球数据治理:挑战与应对[J].国际问题研究,2020,200(6):38-56. [22]王岚.数字贸易壁垒的内涵、测度与国际治理[J].国际经贸探索,2021,37(11):85-100. [23]何波.中国参与数据跨境流动国际规则的挑战与因应[J].行政法学研究,2022,134(4):89-103. [24]汤霞.数据安全与开放之间:数字贸易国际规则构建的中国方案[J].政治与法律,2021,319(12):26-38. [25]DESAI D R, KROLL J A.Trust but verify:a guide to algorithms and the law[J].Harvard journal of law and technology,2017,31(1):1-64. [26]MELTZER J P.Governing digital trade[J].World trade review supplement,2019,18:S23-S48. [27]谭观福.数字贸易规制的免责例外[J].河北法学,2021,39(6):102-120. [28]邵怿.网络数据长臂管辖权——从“最低限度联系”标准到“全球共管”模式[J].法商研究,2021,38(6):73-87. [29]张先锋.数字贸易[M].合肥:合肥工业大学出版社,2021.
2023, 
