A Study on the Characteristics of the Leaders in the Scientific Assessment of Global Climate Change ——Based on the Scientometric Analysis of IPCC AR6 Authors
Huang Kemin1,2, Qu Jiansheng1, Li Jie2,3, Ge Yujie4, Ding Jielan2,3, Song Donghuan2,3
1. National Science Library (Chengdu),Chinese Academy of Sciences,Chengdu 610299,China; 2. Department of Information Resources Management,School of Economics and Management,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China; 3. National Science Library,Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100090,China; 4. College of Earth and Environmental Sciences,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,China
Abstract：The scientific assessment of global climate change provides an important basis for global climate negotiations.As one of the most important sources of climate cognition in the world,the IPCC assessment report is an important medium for the interaction between science and politics.The degree of participation of countries and organizations in the IPCC climate change scientific assessment process directly highlights their status in international climate governance.Exploring the characteristics of the assessment leader is of reference significance for China to enhance the participation of international climate science assessment and fight for the discourse power in global climate governance.It also provides ideas for the future strategic layout of China's climate change.Based on the perspective of scientometric analysis of the authors of IPCC AR6 report,this paper summarizes the characteristics and rules of the academic ability of the leaders,describes the scientific research and macro policy environment of the active institutions and major countries where the leaders are located,comprehensively reveals the characteristics of the leaders and the status of various countries and organizations in global climate negotiations,and puts forward suggestions for China to improve the quality of relevant personnel training,the ability of international climate negotiations and fight for discourse power in global climate governance.
黄珂敏, 曲建升, 李杰, 葛钰洁, 丁洁兰, 宋东桓. 全球气候变化科学评估主导者特征研究——基于IPCC AR6作者的科学计量分析[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2023(12): 125-136.
Huang Kemin, Qu Jiansheng, Li Jie, Ge Yujie, Ding Jielan, Song Donghuan. A Study on the Characteristics of the Leaders in the Scientific Assessment of Global Climate Change ——Based on the Scientometric Analysis of IPCC AR6 Authors. , 2023(12): 125-136.
[1]GUPTA J.The history of global climate governance[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2014. [2]FARRINGTON D,COHN E,SKINNER G.Changes in the most cited scholars in five international journals between 2006 and 2020[J].Asian journal of criminology,2022,17:193-212. [3]陈昕伊.中国ESI高被引科学家和ESI学术期刊的学科分布探析与比较[J].中国科技期刊研究,2022,33 (3):382-390. [4]高阵雨,陈钟,王岐东.海外优秀青年学者回国发展现状分析——以 “千人计划”青年项目入选者申请获批国家自然科学基金情况为例[J].中国科学基金,2017,31 (4):359-363. [5]LIU J,WANG R,XU S.What academic mobility configurations contribute to high performance:an fsQCA analysis of CSC-funded visiting scholars[J].Scientometrics,2021,126:1079-1100. [6]LIAO C H.Exploring the social effect of outstanding scholars on future research accomplishments[J].Journal of the American society for information science and technology,2017,68 (10):2449-2459. [7]任晓亚,张志强,陈云伟.杰出科学家的科研产出规律——以拉斯克医学研究奖得主为例[J].情报学报,2019,38 (9):894-906. [8]FRANCESCHET M,COLAVIZZA G.Time rank:a dynamic approach to rate scholars using citations[J].Journal of informetrics,2017,11 (4):1128-1141. [9]MICHAEL L C,ESTHER L G.A new comparative citation analysis:Google Scholar,Microsoft Academic,Scopus,and Web of Science[J].Journal of business & finance librarianship,2021,26 (1/2),145-163. [10]MALTSEVA D,BATAGELJ V.Collaboration between authors in the field of social network analysis[J].Scientometrics,2022,127:3437-3470. [11]National Research Council (US)and Institute of Medicine (US)Committee on Assessing Integrity in Research Environments.Integrity in scientific research:creating an environment that promotes responsible conduct[M].Washington:National Academies Press (US),2002. [12]AMAN V.Does the Scopus author ID suffice to track scientific international mobility? A case study based on Leibniz laureates[J].Scientometrics,2018,117:705-720. [13]刘红煦,唐莉.获评高被引学者会提升学术产出与影响力吗——来自整体与个体层面的双重验证[J].科学学研究,2021,39 (2):212-221. [14]PAIN E,CARPENTER S.Careers in climate change research:feature index[EB/OL]. (2009-11-27)[2022-04-27].https://www.science.org/content/article/careers-climate-change-research-feature-index. [15]STOCKER T,PLATTNER G K.Rethink IPCC reports[J].Nature,2014,513:163-166. [16]CALLAWAY E.Young scientists lead the way on fresh ideas[J].Nature,2015,518:283-284. [17]IPCC.How early career research scientists can contribute to the work of the IPCC[EB/OL]. (2019-01-23)[2022-06-16].https://archive.ipcc.ch/pdf/ar6_material/leaflet_early_research_scientists.pdf. [18]International Monetary Fund.World Economic Outlook April 2022[EB/OL]. (2022-04-19)[2022-05-26].https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2022/04/19/world-economic-outlook-april-2022. [19]田丹宇,郑文茹.国外应对气候变化的立法进展与启示[J].气候变化研究进展,2020,16 (4):526-534. [20]WOODHALL S C,OWEN L,SARI K.Public health and climate change:how are local authorities preparing for the health impacts of our changing climate[J].Journal of public health,2021,43 (2):425-432. [21]YIOU P,FARANDA D,THAO S,et al.Projected changes in the atmospheric dynamics of climate extremes in France[J].Atmosphere,2021,12 (11):1440. [22]侯冠华.澳大利亚气候政策的调整及其影响[J].区域与全球发展,2020,4 (5):116-133,159. [23]高翔,朱秦汉.印度应对气候变化政策特征及中印合作[J].南亚研究季刊,2016 (1):32-38,4-5. [24]孟浩.法国CO2排放现状、应对气候变化的对策及对我国的启示[J].可再生能源,2013,31 (1):121-128. [25]WOTTON M,NOCK C,FLANNIGAN M.Forest fire occurrence and climate change in Canada[J].International journal of wildland fire,2010,19 (3):253-271. [26]向月皎,张宇宁,王克.中美气候合作与竞争态势分析及中国应对策略[J].环境经济研究,2022,7 (1):11-25. [27]梁晓菲,吕江.碳达峰、碳中和与路径选择:英国绿色低碳转型20年 (2000—2020年)的启示[J].宁夏社会科学,2021 (5):55-65. [28]梁悦晨,曹玉昆.澳大利亚碳排放权交易体系市场框架分析[J].世界林业研究,2015,28 (2):86-90. [29]XIAO Z,BAI X,ZHAO M,et al.Soil organic carbon storage by shaded and unshaded coffee systems and its implications for climate change mitigation in China[J].The journal of agricultural science,2020,158 (8):687-694.. [30]MARTINELLI L A,OMETTO J,FILOSO S,et al.Contextualizing ethanol avoided carbon emissions in Brazil[J].GCB bioenergy,2010,2 (3):152-156. [31]向月皎,张宇宁,王克.中美气候合作与竞争态势分析及中国应对策略[J].环境经济研究,2022,7 (1):11-25. [32]黄晶,付延,梁昱,等.再谈 《斯特恩报告》与气候变化的挑战[J].可持续发展经济导刊,2021 (12):6. [33]FABRIZIO A,TIM B,RONALD C,et al.Carbon implications of converting cropland to bioenergy crops or forest for climate mitigation:a global assessment[J].GCB bioenergy,2015,8 (1):81-95. [34]Environment and climate change Canada.2030 Emissions reduction plan:Canada's next steps for clean air and a strong economy[EB/OL]. (2022-03-29)[2022-06-10].https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/news/2022/03/2030-emissions-reduction-plan-canadas-next-steps-for-clean-air-and-a-strong-economy.html. [35]HURLBERT M,MUSSETTA P,IVARS J.Multilevel analysis and comparison of climate change policies in Argentina and Canada[J].Handbook of climate change adaptation,2014,119:1-20. [36]ALVES M V,SANTOS T,ROGÉRIO D,et al.Spatial and temporal patterns in carbon and nitrogen inputs by net precipitation in Atlantic Forest,Brazil[J].Forest science,2021 (1):1. [37]SINGH A B,MATHUR C.Climate change and pollen allergy in India and South Asia[J].Immunology and allergy clinics of North America,2021,41 (1):33-52. [38]周珂,徐岭,潘文军.中国应对气候变化法治建设刍议[J].2010,187 (2):128-131. [39]TORE D B,ALAMOU A E,EZÉCHIEL O,et al.Assessment of intra-seasonal variability and trends of precipitations in a climate change framework in West Africa[J].Atmospheric and climate sciences,2022,12 (1):22.
2023, 
