Abstract：The technology development of enterprises is mainly reflected in the annual changes of grant inventions.The patent references mainly include scientific paper and technological patent.The former reflects the influence of basic research,while the latter represents the contribution of applied research.In this paper,the analysis model of basic research and applied research on technology development is constructed by integrating paper co-citation network clustering,patent co-citation network clustering and paper-patent hybrid co-citation network clustering.Then,it searched and downloaded Huawei's US grant inventions from 2010 to 2019,and analyzed the impact of basic research and applied research.Secondly,by mapping the paper co-citation network clustering and patent co-citation network clustering into the paper-patent hybrid co-citation network clustering,from the structure perspective and evolutionary perspective.It is found that:① The gradual development of technology promotes the continuous evolution of technology,and part of science into technology subverts the trajectory of technology evolution;②From the single perspective of technology,technology development is partial or fragmented;③Some basic research plays a role of reforming and bridging the technology development.
高继平, 赵婧. 基础科学研究和应用技术研究对企业技术发展的影响与比较——以华为公司为例[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2024(1): 116-126.
Gao Jiping, Zhao Jing. Comparison of Basic Research and Applied Research on Enterprise Technology Development ——Taking Huawei as an Example. , 2024(1): 116-126.
[1]MEYER Martin.Are patenting scientists the better scholars? An exploratory comparison of inventor-authors with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technology[J].Research policy,2006,35(10):1646-1662. [2]BONACCORSI Andrea,THOMA Grid.Institutional complementarity and inventive performance in nano science and technology[J].Research policy,2007,36(6):813-831. [3]刘自强,许海云,罗瑞,等.基于主题关联分析的科技互动模式识别方法研究[J].情报学报, 2019,38(10):997-1011. [4]CALLON Mallon,COURTIAL Jesson,LAVILLE Feccon.Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research:the case of polymer chemsitry[J].Scientometrics,1991,22(1):155-205. [5]VERBEEK Aranold,DEBACKERE Kenraad,LUWEL Marc,et al.Linking science to technology:using bibliographic references in patents to build linkage schemes[J].Scientometrics,2002,54(3):399-420. [6]康宇航.基于融合创新视角的异质性知识流动网络探测研究[J].情报学报,2016,35(9):8. [7]KESSLER M M.Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers[J].Journal of the association for information science & technology,1963,14(1):10-25. [8]宁子晨,魏来.专利主体视角下专利文献与学术论文关联关系发现研究——以“数据挖掘”主题为例[J].图书情报工作,2020,64(12):12. [9]BA Z C,LIANG Z T.A novel approach to measuring science-technology linkage:from the perspective of knowledge network coupling[J].Journal of informetrics,2021,15(3):101167. [10]GAO J P,DING K,TENG L,et al.Hybrid documents co-citation analysis:making sense of the interaction between science and technology in technology diffusion[J].Scientometrics,2012,93(2):459-471. [11]高继平,丁堃,滕立,等.专利-论文混合共被引网络下的知识流动探析[J].科学学研究, 2011,29(8):1184-1189. [12]徐晓丹,柳卸林.大企业为什么要重视基础研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2020,41(9):3-19. [13]中国科学技术信息研究所.中国科技论文统计结果2022[R].北京:中国科学技术信息研究所,2022. [14]中国科学技术信息研究所.中国科技论文统计结果2021[R].北京:中国科学技术信息研究所,2021. [15]殷明,任勇毛,张运栋,等.一种差异化可靠传输控制机制[J].数据与计算发展前沿,2022,4(5):138-151. [16]冷伏海,李宏,王建芳,等.面向2030年的人与科技发展愿景研究[J].中国科学院院刊,2021,36(2):199-207. [17]李博涵,向宇轩,封顶,等.融合知识感知与双重注意力的短文本分类模型[J].软件学报, 2022,33(10):3565-3581. [18]杜鑫乐,徐恪,李彤,等.数据中心网络的流量控制:研究现状与趋势[J].计算机学报,2021,44(7):1287-1309. [19]赵红州,唐敬年.知识单元的静智荷及其在荷空间的表示问题[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 1990,11(1):37-41. [20]赵红州,唐敬年,蒋国华,等.物理定律的知识熵表示问题[J].自然辩证法研究,1991(8):14-22. [21]赵红洲,蒋国华.知识单元与指数规律[J].科学学与科学技术管理,1984,1(9):39-41. [22]刘则渊.用科学知识图谱预测学科前沿趋势[N].科技日报,2015-08-09(2). [23]刘则渊.知识图谱与知识计量的思考[R].大连:大连理工大学WISE Lab,2010.
2024, 
