Abstract：The 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China emphasized the need to strengthen the deep integration of enterprise-led industry-university-research (IUR)cooperation.Supporting enterprises in jointly promoting scientific and technological cooperation with research institutions,and utilizing market forces to lead the breakthroughs in key generic technology (KGT)research,has become an important issue to be urgently addressed.Based on the data of Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share main board equipment manufacturing listed companies during 2011—2020,this paper examines the impact of enterprise-led IUR cooperation (in terms of breadth and depth)on KGT innovation,and the moderating effect of enterprises' structural power (including hierarchical authority,network centrality and resource control).The results show that the breadth and depth of enterprise-led IUR cooperation have an inverted U-shaped impact on KGT innovation.Further examining the moderating role of structural power,it shows that enterprises' hierarchical authority and network centrality can weaken the negative impact of excessive broadening or deepening of enterprise-led IUR cooperation on the KGT innovation.However,enterprises' resource control will strengthen the inverted U-shaped impact of the breadth and depth of enterprise-led IUR cooperation on the KGT innovation.Based on the dominant-subordinate relationship between the subjects of IUR cooperation,this paper expands previous research on the technological innovation effect of IUR cooperation,introduces the structural power of enterprises into the analysis framework of technological innovation effect of IUR cooperation,and also provides important inspirations for the practice of China's equipment manufacturing enterprises to break KGT innovation.
[1]刘洪民,姜黎辉,王中魁.制造业共性技术研发的知识管理评价体系构建[J].科研管理,2016,37 (S1):379-386. [2]马永红,刘海礁,柳清.产业共性技术产学研协同研发策略的微分博弈研究[J].中国管理科学,2019,27 (12):197-207. [3]WANG P,LIU Q.Game analysis on generic technology diffusion process in industry cluster[J].International business and management,2012,4 (2):169-172. [4]樊霞,黄妍,朱桂龙.产学研合作对共性技术创新的影响效用研究[J].科研管理,2018,39 (1):34-44. [5]岑杰,叶二子,肖瑶.跨领域搜索对共性技术溢出的双刃剑效应:产业联盟的放大作用[J].科研管理,2021,42 (7):77-90. [6]陈劲,杨硕.优化我国科技结构强化企业创新主体地位[J].创新科技,2022,22 (6):1-11. [7]孙玉涛,刘凤朝.中国企业技术创新主体地位确立——情境、内涵和政策[J].科学学研究,2016,34 (11):1716-1724. [8]沈家文.强化企业创新主体地位推进产学研深度融合[J].中国经济评论,2021 (9):61-66. [9]卢现祥,李磊.强化企业创新主体地位提升企业技术创新能力[J].学习与实践,2021 (3):30-44. [10]赵永新,谷业凯.推进科技政策扎实落地——访科技部党组书记、部长王志刚[N].人民日报,2021-12-23 (2). [11]PFEDDER J,SALANCIK G R.External control of organizations—resource dependence perspective[M]//Organizational behavior 2.New York:Routledge,2015. [12]CASCIARO T,PISKORSKI M J.Power imbalance,mutual dependence,and constraint absorption:a closer look at resource dependence theory[J].Administrative science quarterly,2005,50 (2):167-199. [13]GULATI R,SYTCH M.Dependence asymmetry and joint dependence in interorganizational relationships:effects of embeddedness on a manufacturer's performance in procurement relationships[J].Administrative science quarterly,2007,52 (1):32-69. [14]ASTLEY W.G,SACHDEVA P S.Structural sources of intraorganizational power:a theoretical synthesis[J].Academy of management review,1984,9 (1):104-113. [15]高丽媛,张屹山.实现共同富裕的分配制度选择:基于权力结构的理论剖析[J].社会科学研究,2018 (1):15-26. [16]孙耀吾,谈媛嫡.模块化创新网络主导企业技术领导力及其结构演化研究[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35 (1):80-87. [17]杨震宁,赵红.中国企业的开放式创新:制度环境、 “竞合”关系与创新绩效[J].管理世界,2020,36 (2):139-160,224. [18]孙冰,刘晨,田胜男.社会网络视角下联盟成员合作关系对技术标准形成的影响[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38 (4):21-27. [19]郑月龙,白春光,李登峰.考虑市场化开发的产业共性技术供给决策研究[J/OL].中国管理科学:1-12[2024-01-24].https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.0124. [20]WILLIAMSON P J,DE MEYER A.Ecosystem advantage:how to successfully harness the power of partners[J].California management review,2012,55 (1):24-46. [21]ALEXY O,GEORGE G,SALTER A.Cui bono? The selective revealing of knowledge and its implications for innovative activity[J].Academy of management review,2013,38 (2):270-291. [22]李子彪,孙可远,赵菁菁.企业知识基础如何调节多源知识获取绩效:基于知识深度和广度的门槛效应[J].科学学研究,2021,39 (2):303-312. [23]梁娟,陈国宏.多重网络嵌入与集群企业知识创造绩效研究[J].科学学研究,2015,33 (1):90-97. [24]CUMMINGS J N.Work groups,structural diversity,and knowledge sharing in a global organization[J].Management science,2004,50 (3):352-364. [25]HELPMAN E,TRAJTENBERG M.A time to sow and a time to reap:growth based on general purpose technologies:w4854[R].Cambridge,MA:National bureau of economic research,1994:w4854. [26]贺超城,吴江,刘福珍,等.基于地理科研主导网络的关键节点识别研究——以药学领域为例[J].情报学报,2021,40 (12):1312-1324. [27]沈映春,廖舫仪.人工智能产业产学研合作申请专利超网络模型研究——以北京为例[J].产业经济评论,2021 (6):68-81. [28]叶云龙,姜卫韬.结构性减税背景下的企业金融化动机:基于企业税收负担视角的实证研究[J].社会科学家,2022 (6):76-85. [29]LIND J T,MEHLUM H.With or without U? The appropriate test for a U-shaped relationship[J].Oxford bulletin of economics and statistics,2010,72 (1):109-118. [30]HAANS R F J,PIETERS C,HE Z.Thinking about U:theorizing and testing U-and inverted U-shaped relationships in strategy research[J].Strategic management journal,2016,37 (7):1177-1195. [31]FISMAN R,SVENSSON J.Are corruption and taxation really harmful to growth? Firm level evidence[J].Journal of development economics,2007,83 (1):63-75.
2024, 
