The Path Choice for Improving the Global Division of Labor Position of Equipment Manufacturing Industry ——Based on the New Development Pattern of“Double Circulation”
Liang Jingwei1,2, Yang Chao3, Yin Mengfei3, Zhong Shichuan4
1. Wu Jinglian School of Economics,Changzhou University,Changzhou 213164,China; 2. Institute of Innovation Strategy and Talent Development,Changzhou University,Changzhou 213164,China; 3. Faculty of Management and Economics,Kunming University of Science and Technology,Kunming 650031,China; 4. School of Economics and Trade, Guangdong University of Finance,Guangzhou 510521,China
Abstract：Building a new development pattern is a strategic task for comprehensively building a socialist modernized country,and high-quality development of the equipment manufacturing industry is a top priority for China's high-quality economic development.This paper brings the domestic and international dual circulation and equipment manufacturing industry into the unified analysis framework,and using the world input-output table to study the impact of domestic cycle and international cycle on the global division of labor status of equipment manufacturing industry,furtherly focusing on the internal mechanism of domestic cycle.The results show that the domestic cycle significantly promotes the global division of labor status of the equipment manufacturing industry,and the international cycle has a positive impact on the economy at the high end of the value chain and a negative impact on the low-end position.The mediating effect indicates that the domestic cycle promotes the global division of labor status of the equipment manufacturing industry by promoting technological progress and strengthening industry concentration.The regulation effect shows that the international cycle will restrain the promotion of the industry scale and technological progress on the domestic cycle,and then affect the status of the global division of labor.The above research conclusions are of great significance for Chinese equipment manufacturing industry to climb the high end of the global value chain and break of the dilemma of“low-end locking,high-end blockade”.
梁经伟, 杨超, 尹梦菲, 钟世川. 装备制造业全球分工地位提升的路径选择——基于“双循环”新发展格局视角[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2024(5): 109-119.
Liang Jingwei, Yang Chao, Yin Mengfei, Zhong Shichuan. The Path Choice for Improving the Global Division of Labor Position of Equipment Manufacturing Industry ——Based on the New Development Pattern of“Double Circulation”. , 2024(5): 109-119.
[1]张兴祥,庄雅娟,黄明亮.全球价值链下中国制造业镜像与突围路径研究:基于“双循环”新发展格局的视角[J].人文杂志,2020(11):72-82. [2]刘志彪,凌永辉.双循环新发展格局的研究视角、逻辑主线和总体框架[J].浙江工商大学学报,2021(2):83-93. [3]黄群慧.新发展格局的理论逻辑、战略内涵与政策体系:基于经济现代化的视角[J].经济研究,2021,56(4):4-23. [4]裴长洪,刘洪愧.构建新发展格局科学内涵研究[J].中国工业经济,2021(6):5-22. [5]陈全润,许健,夏炎,等.国内国际双循环的测度方法及我国双循环格局演变趋势分析[J].中国管理科学,2022,30(1):12-19. [6]黄仁全,李村璞.中国经济国内国际双循环的测度及增长动力研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2022,39(8):80-99. [7]JOHNSON R C,NOGUERA G.Accounting for intermediates:production sharing and trade in value added[J].Journal of International Economics,2012,86(2):224-236. [8]干春晖,满犇.双循环测度与国内大循环内生动力研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2023,43(11):3090-3110. [9]张少军,方玉文,李善同.中国经济双循环的贸易利得分析[J].经济研究,2023,58(4):4-22. [10]黎峰.国内国际双循环:理论框架与中国实践[J].财经研究,2021,47(4):4-18. [11]GEREFFI G,KORZENIEWICZ M.Commodity chains and global capitalism[M].Westport:Praeger,1994. [12]WANG Z,WEI S J,ZHU K.Quantifying international production sharing at the bilateral and sector levels[R].NBER Working Paper,No.19677,2013. [13]MURADOV K.Structure and length of value chains[R].SSRN 3054155,2016. [14]邵朝对,苏丹妮.中国价值链分工的福利效应与空间解构:双循环视角[J].世界经济,2023(1):32-62. [15]王玉燕,涂明慧.国内大循环与制造业全球价值链地位——兼论双循环发展格局的新思路[J].商业研究,2021(6):44-54. [16]张杰,郑文平.全球价值链下中国本土企业的创新效应[J].经济研究,2017,52(3):151-165. [17]吕越,陈帅,盛斌.嵌入全球价值链会导致中国制造的“低端锁定”吗[J].管理世界,2018,34(8):11-29. [18]凌永辉,刘志彪.内需主导型全球价值链的概念、特征与政策启示[J].经济学家,2020(6):26-34. [19]姚博,魏玮.参与生产分割对中国工业价值链及收入的影响研究[J].中国工业经济,2012(10):65-76. [20]田毕飞,陈紫若.创业与全球价值链分工地位:效应与机理[J].中国工业经济,2017(6):136-154. [21]王兵.供应链参与规模对中国区域经济发展的影响——兼论中国的主场全球化[J].经济学家,2022(11):94-105. [22]宋宪萍,贾芸菲.全球价值链的深度嵌入与技术进步关系的机理与测算[J].经济纵横,2019(12):74-85. [23]陈颂,卢晨.产品内国际分工技术进步效应的影响因素研究[J].国际贸易问题,2018(5):26-38. [24]凌丹,张小云.技术创新与全球价值链升级[J].中国科技论坛,2018(10):53-61,100. [25]张会清,翟孝强.中国参与全球价值链的特征与启示:基于生产分解模型的研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2018,35(1):3-22. [26]GELBACH J B.When do covariates matter? And which ones,and how much[J].Journal of Labor Economics,2016,34(2):509-543.
2024, 
