技术-组织-环境三维视角下企业专利价值提升路径研究

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (3)

全文: PDF (1429 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要以90家国家级和省级专精特新“小巨人”上市企业为样本,立足于企业培育专利价值的技术(T)、组织(O)、环境(E)三个维度的资源能力禀赋,梳理专利技术价值、法律价值、市场价值和战略价值的影响因素,运用组态思维和QCA方法解构企业专利价值提升的多重并发因素和复杂因果机制,并对典型案例进行验证性分析。研究发现:企业专利价值提升与其技术所处发展阶段相关,共有3类提升路径,分别为技术开发阶段的“组织主导型”、市场开拓阶段的“技术-组织主导型”、市场成熟阶段的“技术-组织-环境主导型”。研究结论有助于深化企业对多重影响因素协同提升专利价值的理性认识,并为政府培育高价值专利提供实践启示。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	唐恒
	黄文
	程龙
	孙莹琳
	闫宸铭

关键词 ：专利价值提升, TOE框架, 专精特新“小巨人”企业, fsQCA

Abstract：This paper,takes 90 state-level and provincial-level specialized new ‘little giant’listed enterprises as samples,combing the influencing factors of patent technology value,legal value,market value and strategic value promotion from the three dimensions of technology (T),organization (O)and environment (E)of enterprise cultivating patent value,and uses configuration thinking and QCA method to deconstruct the multiple concurrent factors and complex causal mechanism of enterprise patent value enhancement,and makes a confirmatory analysis of typical cases.The study found that the enhancement of enterprise patent value is related to the development stage of its technology.There are three promotion paths named as ‘organization-led’in the technology development stage, ‘technology-organization-led’in the market development stage,and ‘technology-organization-environment-led’in the market maturity stage.The conclusion helps to deepen the rational understanding of enterprises on the synergistic effect of multiple influencing factors to enhance the value of patents and provide practical enlightenment for the government to cultivate high-value patents.

Key words： Enhancement of patent value TOE framework Specialized new‘little giant’enterprise fsQCA

收稿日期: 2023-09-08

PACS:

G306

基金资助:国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“新结构经济学视角下的中国知识产权战略”(20FGLB055),国家重点研发计划资助项目“创新创业生态模型与智能服务模式研究”(2019YFB1405201),江苏大学学生科研项目“高价值专利形成影响因素及培育机制研究”(22C230)。

通讯作者: 黄文

作者简介: 唐恒 (1969—),女,教授,江苏大学博士生导师,研究方向为知识产权管理。

引用本文:

唐恒, 黄文, 程龙, 孙莹琳, 闫宸铭. 技术-组织-环境三维视角下企业专利价值提升路径研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2024(7): 132-142.
Tang Heng, Huang Wen, Cheng Long, Sun Yinglin, Yan Chenming. Research on Paths for Enhancing Patent Value in Enterprises from the Perspective of TOE(Technology-Organization-Environment). , 2024(7): 132-142.

链接本文:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/CN/Y2024/I7/132

[1]杨鑫超,张玉,杨伟超.TRIZ在高价值专利培育工作中的创新应用研究[J].情报杂志,2020,39(7):54-58,86.
[2]胡泽文,周西姬,任萍.基于扎根理论的高价值专利评估与识别研究综述[J].情报科学,2022,40(2):183-192.
[3]李睿,周维,容军凤,等.高价值企业专利的被引特征分析——以世界500强企业专利为例[J].情报学报,2015,34(9):899-911.
[4]刘谦,姜南,王亚利,等.国内高价值专利研究热点演进与整合框架:基于SKM的可视化分析[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(21):151-160.
[5]CHOI J,JEONG B,YOON J,et al.A novel approach to evaluating the business potential of intellectual properties:a machine learning-based predictive analysis of patent lifetime[J].Computers & Industrial Engineering,2020,145:106544.
[6]ZHANG F,JIANG G,HE X.Patent citations and value:through the lens of a social network approach[J].International Journal of Management and Network Economics,2018,4(2):115-143.
[7]AWA H O,UKOHA O,IGWE S R.Revisiting technology-organization-environment(T-O-E)theory for enriched applicability[J].The Bottom Line,2017,30(1):2-22.
[8]李振亚,孟凡生,曹霞.基于四要素的专利价值评估方法研究[J].情报杂志,2010,29(8):87-90.
[9]LANJOUW J O,SCHANKERMAN M.Patent quality and research productivity:measuring innovation with multiple indicators[J].The Economic Journal,2004,114(495):441-465.
[10]刘勤,杨壬淦,刘友华.高价值专利评估方法、存在问题及对策[J].科技管理研究,2022,42(4):147-152.
[11]SOMAYA D,WILLIAMSON I O,ZHANG X.Combining patent law expertise with R&D for patenting performance[J].Organization Science,2007,18(6):922-937.
[12]谭海波,范梓腾,杜运周.技术管理能力、注意力分配与地方政府网站建设:一项基于TOE框架的组态分析[J].管理世界,2019,35(9):81-94.
[13]何喜军,石安杰,武玉英,等.组态视角下基于TOE的可转化专利特征因果推断[J].科学学研究,2022,40(11):1979-1990.
[14]KAPLAN S,VAKILI K.The double-edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation[J].Strategic Management Journal,2015,36(10):1435-1457.
[15]HUANG K G L,HUANG C,SHEN H,et al.Assessing the value of China's patented inventions[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2021,170:120868.
[16]SONG H,HOU J,ZHANG Y.The measurements and determinants of patent technological value:lifetime,strength,breadth,and dispersion from the technology diffusion perspective[J].Journal of Informetrics,2023,17(1):101370.
[17]周克放,乔永忠.基于无效程序的ICT领域专利质量影响因素研究[J].科研管理,2021,42(10):148-155.
[18]LI L,CHEN Q,JIA X,et al.Co-patents' commercialization:evidence from China[J].Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja,2021,34(1):1709-1726.
[19]AGOSTINI L,NOSELLA A,HOLGERSSON M.Patent management:the prominent role of strategy and organization[J].European Journal of Innovation Management,2022,26(4):1054-1070.
[20]孙莹琳,唐恒,程龙,等.企业家专利研发参与度、专利产出策略对企业绩效的影响研究[J].管理学报,2022,19(10):1522-1533.
[21]唐恒,付丽颖,冯楚建.高新技术企业知识产权管理与绩效分析[J].中国科技论坛,2011(5):80-85.
[22]马翔,张春博,杨阳,等.专利代理机构对专利质量的影响研究:基于对1997年发明专利整个保护期的追踪[J].情报杂志,2019,38(2):84-90,171.
[23]晁蓉,赵庆华.基于外部影响因素评价高价值专利的形成[J].大学图书情报学刊,2020,38(2):117-123.
[24]马治国,谢伟,张磊.技术、法律、市场三维视角下我国药品高价值专利评估体系构建研究[J].西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022,52(5):120-130.
[25]文庭孝,杨忠,刘璇.基于专利计量分析的湖南省专利战略研究[J].情报理论与实践,2012,35(1):58-64.
[26]杜运周,贾良定.组态视角与定性比较分析(QCA):管理学研究的一条新道路[J].管理世界,2017(6):155-167.
[27]蔡鸿宇,王向锋,徐宗煌,等.高价值专利有何特征:基于模糊集定性比较分析的组态效应研究[J/OL].情报科学:1-15[2024-06-09].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/22.1264.G2.20231016.1135.040.html.
[28]GUO L,XU P.Controlling shareholders' equity pledge,financing constraints and corporate R&D investment[C]//SHS Web of Conferences.EDP Sciences,2023,154:02008.
[29]刘岩,苏可蒙.专利战略情境下企业技术知识基础多元度对创新绩效的影响效应[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(20):122-130.
[30]晁蓉,黄筱玲,梁丽群.高价值专利形成过程的文献学特征提取与评估模型构建[J].情报探索,2021(10):7-14.
[31]杨丽丽,李华,贾鑫龙.本土制造业“隐形冠军”自主创新动力机制研究:基于模糊集的定性比较分析[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(13):82-89.
[32]陈学文.高新技术企业知识产权管理与服务的实证研究:基于广州市高新技术企业知识产权的调查[J].科技管理研究,2019,39(6):148-154.
[33]HONG W,SU Y S.The effect of institutional proximity in non-local university-industry collaborations:An analysis based on Chinese patent data[J].Research Policy,2013,42(2):454-464.
[34]朱雪忠,李艳.我国中药发明专利质量提升路径:基于专利委托代理视角的实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2021,42(7):87-105.
[35]HAN Y,WANG L,KANG R.Influence of consumer preference and government subsidy on prefabricated building developer's decision-making:A three-stage game model[J].Journal of Civil Engineering and Management,2023,29(1):35-49.
[36]THOMAS A S,LITSCHERT R J,RAMASWAMY K.The performance impact of strategy-manager coalignment:an empirical examination[J].Strategic Management Journal,1991,12(7):509-522.
[37]FISS P C.A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations[J].Academy of Management Review,2007,32(4):1180-1198.
[38]SCHNEIDER C Q,WAGEMANN C.Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences:a guide to qualitative comparative analysis[M].Cambridge University Press,2012.
[39]FISS P C.Building better causal theories:a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research[J].Academy of Management Journal,2011,54(2):393-420.
[40]VERWEIJ S.Bookreview:set-theoretic methods for the social sciences:a guide to qualitative comparative analysis[J].International Journal of Social Research Methodology,2013,16(2):165-166.