Evolutionary Analysis of Basic Research Governance Systems in the Context of Sino-U.S Technological Competition ——Comparative Study Based on Multiple Cases
Liu Wei1,2, Fan Xu2
1. School of Economic Management,Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology,Maoming 525000,China; 2. School of Public Administration,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510641,China
Abstract：This article is based on the “stimulus-response” model of the CAS theory.Employing a multi-case study approach,it conducts a comparative analysis of three fiber optic enterprises,namely L,M,and K,in W city.By exploring the adaptive behaviors of systems in response to Sino-U.S.technological competition,this study delineates the internal mechanisms of their evolution.The research findings indicate that governance entities,influenced by Sino-U.S.technological competition,consolidate value consensus based on their respective national contexts and other adaptive relationships.Consequently,they adjust their attitudes and behaviors,fostering the emergence of new multi-level interactive governance structures among entities.This leads to the generation of collaborative governance forces,ultimately bringing the system into a comparatively “adaptive”state through coordinated adjustments.Additionally,discussing the differentiated development forms that governance structures exhibit in response to various complex governance issues reveals that governance subjects,in order to enhance environmental adaptability,actively seek collaboration with other subjects.The main types of cooperative governance structures are intermittent symbiosis,continuous symbiosis,and integrated symbiosis.
刘伟, 范旭. 中美科技竞争背景下的基础研究治理系统演化分析——基于多案例的比较研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2024(8): 1-12.
Liu Wei, Fan Xu. Evolutionary Analysis of Basic Research Governance Systems in the Context of Sino-U.S Technological Competition ——Comparative Study Based on Multiple Cases. , 2024(8): 1-12.
[1]赵吉.复杂性与公共行政的重构[J].学术月刊,2023,55(2):80-91. [2]ASHBY W R.An introduction to cybernetics[M].London:Chapman and Hall,1956. [3]MOWERY D C,ROSENBERG N.Technology and the pursuit of economic growth[M].New York:Cambridge University Press,1989. [4]李瑞.新形势下科技创新治理复杂性及“元治理”体系构建[J].自然辩证法研究,2021,37(5):60-66. [5]HOLLAND J H.Hidden order:how adaptation builds complexity[M].Redding:Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co.,Inc.,1996. [6]陆铭,任声策,尤建新.基于公共治理的科技创新管理:一个整合框架[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2010,31(6):72-79. [7]FRIETSCH R,SCHUBERT T.Innovation systems revisited:experiences from 40 years of Fraunhofer ISI research[M].Stuttgart:Fraunhofer Information,2012. [8]BOEKHOLT P,ARNOLD E.The governance of research and innovation:an international comparative study[R].Brighton:Technopolis Group,2002. [9]范旭,李瑞娇.美国基础研究的特点分析及其对中国的启示[J].世界科技研究与发展,2019,41(6):634-648. [10]韩宇,龚旭.基础研究中的国家目标及其相关政策[J].科学学研究,1997(2):40-46. [11]马佰莲,曾国屏.“基莱问题”与政府资助基础研究的理性[J].科学文化评论,2007(5):90-101. [12]王彦雨,程志波.我国基础研究资助体系的历史沿革及演变路径律分析[J].科技进步与对策,2011,28(22):94-99. [13]曾明彬,李玲娟.我国基础研究管理制度面临的挑战及对策建议[J].中国科学院院刊,2019,34(12):1440-1447. [14]薛澜.中国科技创新政策40年的回顾与反思[J].科学学研究,2018,36(12):2113-2115,2121. [15]张贤明,张力伟.复杂性:大变局时代的公共行政研究范式[J].学海,2022(2):121-130. [16]欧阳莹之.复杂系统理论基础[M].上海:上海科技出版社,2005. [17]陈森发.复杂系统建模理论与方法[M].南京:东南大学出版社,2005. [18]熊文明,余维新,陈传明.基于复杂适应系统理论的学术创业者双元角色协同过程研究[J].商业经济与管理,2020(8):34-44. [19]MEERKERK I V,BOONSTRA B,EDELENBOS J.Self-organization in urban regeneration:two-case comparative research[J].European Planning Studies,2013,21(10):1630-1652. [20]YIN R K.Case study research design and methods:5th ed[M].CA:Sage,2014. [21]李新,李柏洲,赵健宇.产学研合作视角下企业技术获取协同及其与创新绩效的关系研究[J].运筹与管理,2017,26(7):183-192. [22]陈元志,葛忆翔.基于引领性创新的科技自立自强[J].科学学研究,2021,39(5):770-773. [23]迟景明,张旭雯,何声升.科技自立自强背景下的大学适应性行为[J].高教发展与评估,2022,38(4):30-39,120. [24]熊海峰,祁吟墨.基于共生理论的文化和旅游融合发展策略研究——以大运河文化带建设为例[J].同济大学学报(社会科学版),2020,31(1):40-48. [25]崔运坤,贾燕,夏忠梁,等.全民健身和全民健康融合共生:概念、特征与要素[J].沈阳体育学院学报,2023,42(1):15-20,28. [26]马立超,路超,唐潇风.共生理论视角下工程科技创新人才培养的产教融合困境——以集成电路行业为例[J].科学管理研究,2023,41(1):121-128.
2024, 
