元治理视阈下科技创新治理体系韧性的概念建构

摘要
图/表
参考文献(37)
相关文章 (3)

全文: PDF (2404 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要基于元治理视阈分析科技创新治理体系的韧性,有助于拓展和完善科技创新治理的研究视野和理论体系,亦可为检视我国科技创新治理体系的现代化提供新的视角。鉴于当前学界关于该论题的探索尚处在起步阶段,重点围绕元治理视阈下我国科技创新治理体系韧性的概念建构展开分析。首先,结合系统经济学相关观点,从治理主体、治理客体、治理目标和治理工具4个方面梳理科技创新治理体系的构成要素。进而,通过分析元治理的运行逻辑,从理论、实践和历史经验3个维度论述元治理之于我国科技创新治理现代化的有效性。最后,从社会生态韧性的概念出发,通过解析元治理视阈下科技创新治理体系韧性的主要面向,构建科技创新治理体系韧性的概念模型。后续研究从科技创新治理体系韧性发展机理的角度,进一步分析治理体系的要素和结构对韧性的影响。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	吴丰
	唐月
	林超然

关键词 ：科技创新治理体系, 元治理, 社会生态韧性, 构成要素, 概念模型

Abstract：Examining the resilience of the governance system for technological innovation through the lens of meta-governance enriches the research perspective and theoretical framework pertaining to the governance of technological innovation.It also offers a novel viewpoint for scrutinizing the modernization of China's technological innovation governance system.Recognizing the nascent stage of scholarly inquiry in this domain,this study is devoted to the conceptual formulation of resilience within China's technological innovation governance system,adopting a meta-governance approach.Initially,it leverages insights from systemic economics to dissect the components of the technological innovation governance system,categorizing them into governance subjects,objects,goals,and instruments.Subsequently,this paper scrutinizes the operational rationale of meta-governance,appraising its efficacy in enhancing the modernization of China's technological innovation governance through theoretical,practical,and historical dimensions.Culminating with the social-ecological concept of resilience,the study proposes a conceptual model for the resilience of the technological innovation governance system,reflecting on its key attributes from a meta-governance perspective.Future research will delve into the influence of the governance system's composition and structure on its resilience,guided by an understanding of the developmental mechanisms underpinning the resilience of the technological innovation governance system.

Key words： Scientific and technological innovation governance system Meta-governance Social-ecological resilience Component Conceptual model

收稿日期: 2023-09-11

PACS:

G301

基金资助:国家自然科学基金重点项目“中国企业创新链产业链融合发展模式与机制研究”(72232004),国家自然科学基金青年项目“基于专利数据挖掘的我国芯片产业关键技术研发路径选择研究”(72104064)。

通讯作者: 唐月

作者简介: 吴丰(1993—),男,湖北恩施人,管理学博士,助理研究员,研究方向为科技创新治理。

引用本文:

吴丰, 唐月, 林超然. 元治理视阈下科技创新治理体系韧性的概念建构[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2024(8): 158-168.
Wu Feng, Tang Yue, Lin Chaoran. Conception of the Resilience of Science and Technology Innovation Governance System from the Meta-Governance Perspective. , 2024(8): 158-168.

链接本文:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/CN/Y2024/I8/158

[1]陈劲,阳镇,朱子钦.新型举国体制的理论逻辑、落地模式与应用场景[J].改革,2021(5):1-17.
[2]张来武.科技创新的宏观管理:从公共管理走向公共治理[J].中国软科学,2012(6):1-5.
[3]程志波.论我国当前科学宏观管理体制改革的若干问题[J].中国科技论坛,2014(12):34-38.
[4]胡海鹏,袁永,康捷.国际科技创新治理体系建设经验及对广东的启示[J].科学管理研究,2019,37(1):113-116.
[5]蔡跃洲.数字经济的国家治理机制——数据驱动的科技创新视角[J].北京交通大学学报(社会科学版),2021,20(2):39-49.
[6]陈套.中国创新体系的治理与区域创新治理能力评价研究[D].合肥:中国科学技术大学,2016.
[7]赵新峰,李水金,王鑫.协同视阈下雄安新区创新共同体治理体系的建构方略[J].中国行政管理,2020(6):44-50.
[8]曹璇,任维德.新时代科技创新治理体系构建研究[J].科学管理研究,2022,40(1):37-45.
[9]樊春良.国家科技治理体系的理论构架与政策蕴含[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2022,43(3):3-23.
[10]ROMER P M.Increasing returns and long-run growth[J].Journal of Political Economy,1986,94(5):1002-1037.
[11]BRANSTETTER L,SAKAKIBARA M.Japanese research consortia:a microeconometric analysis of industrial policy[J].The Journal of Industrial Economics,1998,46(2):207-233.
[12]ACEMOGLU D,AKCIGIT U,ALP H,et al.Innovation,reallocation,and growth[J].American Economic Review,2018,108(11):3450-3491.
[13]BĂZĂVAN A.Chinese government's shifting role in the national innovation system[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2019,148:119738.
[14]钟书华.论科技举国体制[J].科学学研究,2009,27(12):1785-1792.
[15]蔡跃洲.中国共产党领导的科技创新治理及其数字化转型——数据驱动的新型举国体制构建完善视角[J].管理世界,2021,37(8):30-46.
[16]樊春良.“科技创新举国体制”是什么[J].民主与科学,2010(4):37-42.
[17]雷丽芳,潜伟,吕科伟.科技举国体制的内涵与模式[J].科学学研究,2020,38(11):1921-1927.
[18]李瑞.新形势下科技创新治理复杂性及“元治理”体系构建[J].自然辩证法研究,2021,37(5):60-66.
[19]HILLMAN K,NILSSON M,RICKNE A,et al.Fostering sustainable technologies:a framework for analysing the governance of innovation systems[J].Science and Public Policy,2011,38(5):403-415.
[20]DEDEHAYIR O,MÄKINEN S J,ROLAND ORTT J.Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis:a literature review[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2018,136:18-29.
[21]王诗宗.治理理论及其中国适用性[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2009.
[22]JESSOP B.Capitalism and its future:remarks on regulation,government and governance[J].Review of International Political Economy,1997,4(3):561-581.
[23]JESSOP B.The rise of Governance and the risks of failure:the case of economic development[J].International Social Science Journal,1998,50(155):29-45.
[24]塞缪尔·P.亨廷顿.变化社会中的政治秩序[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2021.
[25]亚历山大·汉密尔顿,詹姆斯·麦迪逊,约翰·杰伊.联邦党人文集[M].北京:中国青年出版社,2022.
[26]薛澜,张帆.治理理论与中国政府职能重构[J].人民论坛·学术前沿,2012(4):6-15.
[27]史永乐,严良.完善科技创新元治理体系的路径——来自发达国家的经验与启示[J].江汉论坛,2022(5):66-72.
[28]李丹.技术创新元治理研究[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2022,43(7):195-199.
[29]陈劲.全球科技创新的前沿分析及对策[J].人民论坛·学术前沿,2019(24):8-13.
[30]HOLLING C S.Resilience and stability of ecological systems[J].Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,1973,4:1-23.
[31]TIMMERMAN P.Vulnerability,resilience and the collapse of society:a review of models and possible climatic applications[M].Toronto:Institute for Environmental Studies,University of Toronto,1981.
[32]HOLLING C S,MEFFE G K.Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management[J].Conservation Biology,1996,10(2):328-337.
[33]GUNDERSON L H,HOLLING C S.Panarchy:understanding transformations in human and natural systems[M].Washington:Island Press,2002.
[34]梁林,赵玉帛,刘兵.国家级新区创新生态系统韧性监测与预警研究[J].中国软科学,2020(7):92-111.
[35]朱多刚,郭俊华.专利资助政策的创新与扩散:面向中国省份的事件史分析[J].公共行政评论,2016,9(5):64-83.
[36]李博.后扶贫时代深度贫困地区脱贫成果巩固中的韧性治理[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2020,20(4):172-180.
[37]乌杰.系统哲学基本原理[M].北京:人民出版社,2014.