Research on the Multiple Paths and Heterogeneity of Collaborative Innovation Driving the Efficiency Improvement of Technological Achievements Transformation
Zhang Yaming, Zhao Ke, Liu Haiou, Song Wenjie
School of Economics and Management,Yanshan University,Qinhuangdao 066004,China
Abstract：Transformation of scientific and technological achievements is an important task of implementing the innovation-driven development strategy,and collaborative innovation is a key measure to improve the transformation efficiency of scientific and technological achievements.The theoretical framework of the impact of collaborative innovation on the transformation efficiency of scientific and technological achievements is constructed from the four levels of input,output,environment and interaction.Taking 30 provinces in China as samples,the fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis(fsQCA)is used to explore the multiple realization paths and regional heterogeneity of the efficiency improvement of the transformation of scientific and technological achievements driven by collaborative innovation.The results show that:①A single collaborative innovation element does not constitute the necessary conditions for high transformation efficiency of scientific and technological achievements,but the intensity of scientific research incentives as the core element has a universal effect on improving the transformation efficiency of scientific and technological achievements;②There are three types of collaborative innovation-driven configurations to improve the transformation efficiency of scientific and technological achievements,which can be summarized into two realization paths,namely,scientific research environment-driven and incentive-type under the guarantee of scientific research funds,with the former containing the most cases;③Non-high transformation efficiency of scientific and technological achievements is not the opposite of high transformation efficiency,and poor scientific research quality is an important factor for non-high transformation efficiency;④Heterogeneity analysis shows that the scientific research environment,scientific research output,and scientific research quality have a key role in improving the transformation efficiency of scientific and technological achievements in the eastern,central,and western regions of China,respectively,while the lack of scientific research investment and scientific research quality has a general adverse impact.
张亚明, 赵科, 刘海鸥, 宋雯婕. 协同创新驱动科技成果转化效率提升的多元路径与异质性研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2024(10): 42-52.
Zhang Yaming, Zhao Ke, Liu Haiou, Song Wenjie. Research on the Multiple Paths and Heterogeneity of Collaborative Innovation Driving the Efficiency Improvement of Technological Achievements Transformation. , 2024(10): 42-52.
[1]李晓华,李纪珍,杨若鑫.科技成果转化:研究评述与展望[J].外国经济与管理,2023,45(4):119-136. [2]胡文静,马建霞,谢珍.经济发展新常态与技术封锁并存情景下如何促进科技成果转化——政策选择的视角[J].中国科技论坛,2022(7):32-43. [3]霍国庆,唐露源.科技成果转化的大规模定制模型与案例研究[J].科学学研究,2023,41(12):2175-2181. [4]贾永飞,郭玥.知识基因视角下科技成果转化影响因素研究[J].科技进步与对策,2023,40(10):67-78. [5]孟凡生,马茹浩.离散制造智能化关键技术协同创新及影响因素研究[J].科研管理,2023,44(1):37-47. [6]陈丹玲,卢新海,张超正,等.组态视角下协同创新驱动城市土地绿色利用效率提升的路径选择[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2022,32(10):103-111. [7]陈辉,彭志浩,林超辉,等.工科高校科技成果转化绩效影响因素相关性分析——以16所全国重点高校为数据样本[J].中国高校科技,2021(Z1):120-123. [8]POWERS J B,MCDOUGALL P P.University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public:a resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship[J].Journal of Business Venturing,2005,20(3):291-311. [9]BOH W F,DE-HAAN U,STROM R.University technology transfer through entrepreneurship:faculty and studentsin spinoffs[J].The Journal of Technology Transfer,2016,41(4):661-669. [10]陈黎,玄兆辉.政府属科研机构科技成果转化影响因素研究——以广州为例[J].中国科技论坛,2022(11):45-55. [11]邓洁,张彩铃,李源信.高校专利质量对专利转化的影响效应研究:基于“双一流”高校的实证研究[J].情报杂志,2021,40(10):200-207. [12]钟卫,陈海鹏,姚逸雪.加大科技人员激励力度能否促进科技成果转化——来自中国高校的证据[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(7):125-133. [13]田蓬鹏,李冬梅,姜心禄,等.种业科研人员参与科技成果转化的响应行为研究[J].中国科技论坛,2020(3):135-147. [14]GANS J S,MURRAY F E,STERN S.Contracting over the disclosure of scientific knowledge:intellectual property and academic publication[J].Research Policy,2017,46(4):820-835. [15]THOMPSON N C,ZIEDONIS A A,MOWERY D C.University licensing and the flow of scientific knowledge[J].Research Policy,2018,47(6):1060-1069. [16]VILLANI E,RASMUSSEN E,GRIMALDI R.How intermediary organizations facilitate university-industry technology transfer:a proximity approach[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2017(114):86-102. [17]CASTILLO F,GILLESS J K,HEIMAN A,et al.Time of adoption and intensity of technology transfer:an institutional analysis of offices of technology transfer in the United States[J].The Journal of Technology Transfer,2018,43(1):120-138. [18]ZAICHENKO S.The human resource dimension of science-based technology transfer:lessons from Russian RTOs and innovative enterprises[J].The Journal of Technology Transfer,2018,43(2):368-388. [19]CLAYTON P,FELDMAN M,LOWE N.Behind the scenes:intermediary organizations that facilitate science commercialization through entrepreneurship[J].Academy of Management Perspectives,2018,32(1):104-124. [20]FINI R,RASMUSSEN E,SIEGEL D,et al.Rethinking the commercialization of public science:from entrepreneurial outcomes to societal impacts[J].Academy of Management Perspectives,2018,32(1):4-20. [21]GALUSHKO V,SAGYNBEKOV K.Commercialization of university research in Canada:what can we do better?[J].International Journal of Business Administration,2014,5(5):1-13. [22]LACH S,SCHANKERMAN M.Incentives and invention in universities[J].The RAND Journal of Economics,2008,39(2):403-433. [23]杨水利,史童,王春嬉,等.产学研合作耦合关系对科技成果转化绩效的影响研究——组织学习的中介作用[J].科技管理研究,2019,39(4):211-217. [24]董会忠,曹正旭,张仁杰.中国高技术产业两阶段绿色创新效率及影响因素识别[J].统计与决策,2022,38(6):44-49. [25]何彬,范硕.中国大学科技成果转化效率演变与影响因素:基于Bootstrap-DEA方法和面板Tobit模型的分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2013,34(10):85-94. [26]梁树广.高校科技成果转化效率的区域差异及其影响因素分析[J].统计与决策,2018,34(12):86-89. [27]林青宁,毛世平.高校科技成果转化效率研究[J].中国科技论坛,2019(5):144-151,162. [28]赵公民,吕京芹,王仰东,等.互联网背景下“双一流”高校科技成果转化效率研究[J].软科学,2021,35(8):45-50. [29]CHEN X X,SHU X.The scientific and technological innovation performance of Chinese world-class universities and its influencing factors[J].IEEE Access,2021(9):84639-84650. [30]罗茜,高蓉蓉,曹丽娜.高校科技成果转化效率测度分析与影响因素扎根研究——以江苏省为例[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(5):43-51. [31]孙俊华,魏丽.中国高校科技成果转化路径选择——中国内地28省市模糊集定性比较分析[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(20):20-27. [32]谢黎,杨华,张志强.基于文本量化的地方科技成果转化政策工具效果评价[J].中国科技论坛,2022(12):55-66. [33]张明,杜运周.组织与管理研究中QCA方法的应用:定位、策略和方向[J].管理学报,2019,16(9):1312-1323. [34]池毛毛,赵晶,李延晖,等.企业平台双元性的实现构型研究:一项模糊集的定性比较分析[J].南开管理评论,2017,20(3):65-76. [35]杜运周.习惯了西方范式,更需要中国的主场[J].管理学报,2017,14(1):25-26. [36]辛本禄,穆思宇.组态视角下企业服务创新绩效的影响因素研究:基于fsQCA的实证分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2023,44(3):169-184. [37]张卫国.我国高校科研生产率提升路径研究:基于31个省份的模糊集定性比较分析[J].中国高教研究,2019(7):78-84. [38]王松,聂菁菁.区域产业集群创新效率与路径:基于模糊集定性比较分析[J].科技管理研究,2022,42(4):163-172. [39]FISS P C.Building better causal theories:a fuzzy set approach totypologies in organization research[J].Academy of Management Journal,2011,54(2):393-420. [40]SCHNEIDER C Q,WAGEMANN C.Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences:a guide to qualitative comparative analysis[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2012. [41]RAGIN C C.Set relations in social research:evaluating their consistency and coverage[J].Political Analysis,2006,14(3):291-310. [42]张亚明,宋雯婕,武晓涵,等.科技创新驱动产业升级的多重并发因果关系与多元路径[J].科研管理,2021,42(12):19-28. [43]张明,陈伟宏,蓝海林.中国企业“凭什么”完全并购境外高新技术企业:基于94个案例的模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)[J].中国工业经济,2019(4):117-135. [44]王文寅,梁晓霞.创新驱动能力影响因素实证研究——以山西省为例[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33(3):43-49.
2024, 
