Abstract：A reasonable allocation of scientific data rights is the key to alleviate the traceability of scientific data and to stimulate the high-quality production and open sharing of scientific data.The rights allocation model centred on the rights of data holders aligns with the goals of stimulating academic creation and encouraging investment in scientific research implied in the policy of open sharing of scientific data.It is necessary to adjust the interests between data sources,holders and users regarding the use of scientific data through the initial empowerment and the subsequent design of the system and establish a system of scientific data holders'rights reflecting the idea of separation.This system serves as an institutional tool to regulate the order of scientific data circulation and utilization of scientific data.The empowerment of scientific data resources focuses on promoting the circulation and utilization of scientific data,maximizing the value of data elements.Holders of scientific data resources,such as researchers,laboratory teams and research institutes,possess limited rights to identify and use scientific data resources based on their processing behaviour and factual control status,but this must not impede the freedom of subsequent users to access and cite scientific data,striving to establish a pluralistic and open mechanism for the supply of scientific data resources.When scientific data resources are processed to form scientific data products of relatively stable form and value,it is necessary to draw on the intellectual property rights system to grant holders of scientific data products limited and exclusive stable property rights,allowing them to realize the value of data products through authorized operation,and then separating the right to operate scientific data products from the right to hold scientific data products,so as to motivate them to continuously provide high-quality data products and services.
李凡. 开放共享视野下科学数据权利配置的实现路径[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2025(2): 19-29.
Li Fan. The Realization Path of Scientific Data Rights Allocation Under the Vision of Open Sharing. , 2025(2): 19-29.
[1]中共中央国务院关于构建更加完善的要素市场化配置体制机制的意见[EB/OL].(2020-04-09)[2024-01-19].https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2020-04/09/content_5500622.htm. [2]吴汉东.数据财产赋权的立法选择[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2023(4):44-57. [3]熊丙万,何娟.数据确权:理路、方法与经济意义[J].法学研究,2023(3):54-72. [4]熊易.国际开放科学数据实证资源及利用研究[J].图书馆理论与实践,2016(1):12-14. [5]邢文明,杨玲.中美科学数据政策比较——以《科学数据管理办法》和《促进联邦资助科研成果获取的备忘录》为例[J].图书馆论坛,2022(11):113-121. [6]CODATA-RDA legal interoperability interest group,legal interoperability of research data[EB/OL].(2016-10-20)[2024-01-20].https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/rest/items/item_2042216_2/component/file_2042217/content. [7]European Commission.Guidelines to the rules on open access to scientific publications and open access to research data in Horizon 2020[EB/OL].(2017-03-21)[2024-01-20].https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/oa_pilot/h2020-hi-oa-pilot-guide_en.pdf. [8]数据安全法草案:落实数据安全保护责任规定支持促进措施[EB/OL].(2020-06-28)[2024-02-12].http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/c30834/202006/97f149839ff04c428224f6344ead 7e38.shtml. [9]屈宇,叶继元.高校图书馆科学数据监管中的知识产权保护与治理[J].图书馆建设,2024(1):1-12. [10]吕廷君.政府数据开放的法治思维[J].理论探索,2017(4):111-117. [11]翟军,梁佳佳,吕梦雪,等.欧盟开放科学数据的FAIR原则及启示[J].图书与情报,2020(6):103-111. [12]王锡锌,王融.公共数据概念的扩张及其检讨[J].华东政法大学学报,2023(4):17-27. [13]都平平,李雨珂,陈越.高校科研数据资产化存储及数据复用权益许可研究[J].图书情报工作,2022(2):45-53. [14]张素华.数据产权结构性分置的法律实现[J].东方法学,2023(2):73-85. [15]章诚.基于数据主权与数据权利的学术期刊数据权保护[J].南京大学学报,2022(6):149-157. [16]许燕,麻思蓓,郑彦宁,等.科学数据的法律属性与知识产权管理[J].科技管理研究,2020(22):177-182. [17]盛小平,袁圆.科学数据开放共享中的数据权利治理研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2021(5):80-96. [18]冯媛.科学数据开放共享的知识产权治理研究[J].图书馆,2023(2):56-62. [19]刘莉,司莉.科学数据治理实践:内容体系与发展趋势[J].情报理论与实践,2023(12):175-182. [20]唐素琴,曹婉迪.对我国科学数据权属界定的若干思考[J].科技与法律(中英文),2023(2):32-41. [21]陈铭.知识生产视域下的科学数据出版实践——兼论学术出版商的角色定位与功能分析[J].科技与出版,2022(12):102-109. [22]吴立宗,南卓铜,王亮绪.科学数据出版:促进数据共享的一种新模式[J].中国科技资源导刊,2014(5):72-78. [23]张藤予,丁遒劲,余慧,等.国际科学数据出版政策对我国建设科学数据仓储的启示[J].数字图书馆论坛,2023(8):44-51. [24]雷浩伟,廖秀健.数据治理视阈下数据权力与数据权利研究:存续逻辑、冲突悖论与完善进路[J].科技与法律(中英文),2021(5):22-33. [25]刘权.个人信息保护的权利化分歧及其化解[J].中国法律评论,2022(6):107-120. [26]司马航.欧盟公共数据共享的制度构造和经验借鉴——以欧盟《数据治理法》为视角[J].德国研究,2023(4):67-87,126-127. [27]梅夏英.数据的法律属性及其民法定位[J].中国社会科学,2016(9):164-183,209. [28]周林彬,马恩斯.大数据确权的法律经济学分析[J].东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版),2018(2):30-37. [29]杨立新,陈小江.衍生数据是数据专有权的客体[N].中国社会科学报,2016-07-13(5). [30]郝思洋.知识产权视角下数据财产的制度选项[J].知识产权,2019(9):45-60. [31]申卫星.论数据用益权[J].中国社会科学,2020(11):110-131,207. [32]梅夏英.企业数据权益原论:从财产到控制[J].中外法学,2021(5):1188-1207. [33]申卫星.论数据产权制度的层级性:“三三制”数据确权法[J].中国法学,2023(4):26-48. [34]宁园.从数据生产到数据流通:数据财产权益的双层配置方案[J].法学研究,2023(3):73-91. [35]许可.从权利束迈向权利块:数据三权分置的反思与重构[J].中国法律评论,2023(2):22-37. [36]包晓丽.二阶序列式数据确权规则[J].清华法学,2022(3):60-75. [37]SMITH H E.Exclusion versus governance:Two strategies for delineating property rights[J].The Journal of Legal Studies,2002(31):453-487. [38]姚佳.企业数据权益:控制、排他性与可转让性[J].法学评论,2023(4):149-159. [39]张素华,王年.数据产权“双阶二元结构”的证成与建构[J].中国法律评论,2023(6):138-156. [40]高富平.数据持有者的权利配置——数据产权结构性分置的法律实现[J].比较法研究,2023(3):26-40. [41]金耀.从数据排他到数据治理:数据持有者权的双阶构造[J].电子政务,2024(7):112-124. [42]徐玖玖.利益均衡视角下数据产权的分类分层实现[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2023(2):67-81.
2025, 
