Study on the Sustainable Development of Scientist-Founded Enterprise Driven by Entrepreneurship ——Taking Hard Technology Enterprises as an Example
Guo Yanqing1,2, Zou Jiayi1
1. School of Business,Liaoning University,Shenyang 110036,China; 2. The Center for Innovation and Entrepreneurship Research,Liaoning University,Shenyang 110036,China
Abstract：This study focuses on hard-tech enterprises founded by scientists as the research object.By employing the LDA topic model,it analyzes the entrepreneurial spirit system of these enterprises in real-world contexts and uses the fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis method(fsQCA)to explore the impact of this entrepreneurial spirit system on corporate sustainable development.The findings reveal three entrepreneurial spirit-driven paths for the sustainable development of scientist-founded enterprises:the dual-dominant path,the holistic synergy-driven path,and the specific-matching path.Additionally,four entrepreneurial spirit patterns that hinder corporate sustainable development are identified,shedding light on the limitations of entrepreneurial spirit in the sustainable development of Chinese scientist-founded enterprises.Further analysis from the perspective of sustainable development characteristics of these enterprises shows two distinct paths—the steady progress-driven path and the mission empowerment-driven path—exemplified by artificial intelligence and biotechnology enterprises.The findings offer valuable insights for the high-quality and long-term development of scientist-founded enterprises,particularly those representing the hard technology sector.
郭燕青, 邹家祎. 企业家精神驱动科学家创业企业可持续发展研究——以硬科技企业为例[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2025(2): 84-94.
Guo Yanqing, Zou Jiayi. Study on the Sustainable Development of Scientist-Founded Enterprise Driven by Entrepreneurship ——Taking Hard Technology Enterprises as an Example. , 2025(2): 84-94.
[1]王婧,雷家骕.“基于科学的企业”主导逻辑研究——以同方威视为例[J].科研管理,2022,43(11):1-10. [2]STUART T E,DING W W.When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences[J].American Journal of Sociology,2006,112:97-144. [3]李晓华,李纪珍,高旭东.角色认同与创业机会开发:基于扎根理论的技术创业研究[J].南开管理评论,2022,25(3):73-86. [4]CHEN Y,LIU W,SINDAKIS S,et al.Transferring scientific knowledge to academic startups:the moderating effect of the dual identity of academic entrepreneurs on forming knowledge depth and knowledge breadth[J].Journal of the Knowledge Economy,2024,15(1):1823-1844. [5]徐示波,仲伟俊.科学商业情境下科学家创业过程研究:基于扎根理论的质性规律探讨[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(6):152-160. [6]蔡双立,郭嫱.专精特新企业学术型高管与企业持续创新——企业激励机制与风险承担水平的双调节效应[J].浙江工商大学学报,2023(1):120-134. [7]孙黎,朱蓉,张玉利.企业家精神:基于制度和历史的比较视角[J].外国经济与管理,2019,41(9):3-16. [8]RAMOGLOU S,GARTNER W B,TSANG E W K.“Who is an entrepreneur?”is(still)the wrong question[J].Journal of Business Venturing Insights,2020,13:e00168. [9]HAYTER C,FISCHER B,RASMUSSEN E.Becoming an academic entrepreneur:How scientists develop an entrepreneurial identity[J].Small Business Economics,2022,59:1469-1487. [10]DUTTON J E,DUKERICH J M,HARQUAIL C V.Organizational images and member identification[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1994,39(2):239-263. [11]董念念,王雪莉.管理者榜样作用与文化类型的交互对员工企业文化认同的影响研究[J].管理学报,2018,15(8):1136-1143. [12]RAVASI D,SCHULTZ M.Responding to organizational identity threats:Exploring the role of organizational culture[J].Academy of Management Journal,2006,49(3):433-458. [13]SIRMON D G,HITT M A,IRELAND R D,et al.Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage:Breadth,depth,and life cycle effects[J].Journal of Management,2011,37(5):1390-1412. [14]KURATKO D F,AUDRETSCH D B.The future of entrepreneurship:The few or the many[J].Small Business Economics,2022,59(1):269-278. [15]BLEI D M,NG A Y,JORDAN M I.Latent dirichlet allocation[J].The Journal of Machine Learning Research,2003(3):993-1022. [16]WANG Y L,LI Y K,WU J.Digital identities of female founders and crowdfunding performance:An exploration based on the LDA topic model[J].Gender in Management,2022,37(5):659-678. [17]PISANO G P.Profiting from innovation and the intellectual property revolution[J].Research Policy,2006,35:1122-1130. [18]牛萍,唐梦雪,瞿群臻.高层次科技创业人才及其创业企业的成长特征、瓶颈及对策[J].中国科技论坛,2021(2):109-120. [19]GAO J,WU H Y,YOU J X,et al.Migrant entrepreneurs and firm innovation[J].Accounting and Finance,2021,61(5):6069-6112. [20]YL-ANTTILA T,ERANTI V,KUKKONEN A.Topic modeling for frame analysis:A study of media debates on climate change in India and USA[J].Global Media and Communication,2021,18(1):91-112. [21]邓少军,于保平,苏勇.“家国情怀”如何驱动企业战略转型[J].外国经济与管理,2023,45(4):3-22. [22]刘和东,陈文潇.资源互补与行为协同提升合作绩效的黑箱解构——以高新技术企业为对象的实证分析[J].科学学研究,2020,38(10):1847-1857. [23]胡海波,黄涛.企业持续成长导向的组织变革中多层次协同行为策略:基于富兴科技的案例研究[J].经济管理,2015,37(11):53-62. [24]尼古莱·J.福斯,彼得·G.克莱因.企业家的企业理论:研究企业的新视角[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2020. [25]唐慧洁,罗瑾琏,易明,等.科创企业创新悖论的主动应对机制:基于管理者角色身份建构的探索性案例研究[J].管理世界,2023,39(10):189-205. [26]THOMSEN S,POULSEN T,BRSTING C,et al.Industrial foundations as long-term owners[J].Corporate Governance:An International Review,2018,26(3):180-196. [27]卜美文.企业家精神赋能可持续发展的影响机制研究[J].财经科学,2022(9):75-90. [28]兰军,严广乐,王倩.创新生态视角下小微企业异质性资源对创新绩效的影响研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2019,40(1):137-149. [29]GE C,HUANG K,PNG I P L.Engineer/scientist careers:Patents,online profiles,and misclassification bias[J].Strategic Management Journal,2016,37(1):232-253. [30]蔡绍洪,俞立平.创新数量、创新质量与企业效益——来自高技术产业的实证[J].中国软科学,2017(5):30-37. [31]杨旭东,彭晨宸,姚爱琳.管理层能力、内部控制与企业可持续发展[J].审计研究,2018(3):121-128. [32]RIHOUX B,RAGIN C.Configurational comparative methods:Qualitative comparative analysis(QCA)and related techniques[M].California:SAGE Publications,Inc,2009. [33]FISS P C.Building better causal theories:A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research[J].Academy of Management Journal,2011,54(2):393-420. [34]杜运周,贾良定.组态视角与定性比较分析(QCA):管理学研究的一条新道路[J].管理世界,2017(6):155-167. [35]许治,陈郑逸帆,朱明晶.企业持续创新必然促进业绩增长:基于环境动荡性调节效应的分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2020,41(12):3-19. [36]孔令文,徐长生,易鸣.市场竞争程度、需求规模与企业技术创新:基于中国工业企业微观数据的研究[J].管理评论,2022,34(1):118-129. [37]张广冬,邵艳.风险投资与公司客户稳定性[J].会计研究,2022(4):179-192. [38]胡波,王骜然.互联网企业创始人控制权对企业长期业绩的影响探究[J].经济问题,2016(7):70-75.
2025, 
