A Comparative Study of Artificial Intelligence Governance Regime from the Perspective of Regulation Theory ——Evidences from the British and America
Zeng Xiong1, Zhang Hui2
1. School of Humanities and Social Sciences,University of Science and Technology Beijing,Beijing 100083,China; 2. School of Public Affairs,University of Science and Technology of China,Anhui Hefei 230026,China
Abstract：Each country has its own unique AI governance model,the UK relies on governance frameworks and principles,the US focuses on the internal management of enterprises,while China actively stipulates rules and promotes AI law,and these models are principles-based regulation,management-based regulation and rules-based regulation respectively.Each of them has its own advantages and disadvantages,so they are complementary.This article believes that China's AI governance model has the advantages of clear rules,effective enforcement,and unified standards,while its shortcomings are rigid rules and insufficient adaptability.So,we can improve its flexibility and industry self-management autonomy like the UK and the US.Firstly,we shall adopt appropriate prevention principles;Secondly ensure the dynamic nature of rules through a learning mechanism;Thirdly,improve the effectiveness of self-regulation of enterprises;fourthly,we shall adhere to the combination of governance through technology and rules.
曾雄, 张辉. 规制理论视野下的人工智能治理模式比较及启示——基于英美治理实践的观察[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2025(2): 117-126.
Zeng Xiong, Zhang Hui. A Comparative Study of Artificial Intelligence Governance Regime from the Perspective of Regulation Theory ——Evidences from the British and America. , 2025(2): 117-126.
[1]FORD C L.New governance,compliance and principles-based securities regulation[J].American Business Law Journal,2008,45(1):1-60. [2]GUNNINGHAM N,SINCLAIR D.Organizational trust and the limits of management-based regulation[J].Law & Society Review,2009,43(4):865-900. [3]岳昆,房超.中美人工智能国家科技战略决策模式比较研究:基于多元决策视角[J].中国科技论坛,2023(1):173. [4]薛澜,贾开,赵静.人工智能敏捷治理实践:分类监管思路与政策工具箱构建[J].中国行政管理,2024,40(3):99-110. [5]刘艳红.生成式人工智能的三大安全风险及法律规制:以ChatGPT为例[J].东方法学,2023(4):29-43. [6]郭春镇.生成式AI的融贯性法律治理:以生成式预训练模型(GPT)为例[J].现代法学,2023,45(3):88-107. [7]张凌寒.生成式人工智能的法律定位与分层治理[J].现代法学,2023,45(4):126-141. [8]张欣.生成式人工智能的算法治理挑战与治理型监管[J].现代法学,2023,45(3):108-123. [9]商建刚.生成式人工智能风险治理元规则研究[J].东方法学,2023(3):4-17. [10]New principles on use of AI in education[EB/OL].(2023-07-04)[2024-03-20].https://russellgroup.ac.uk/news/new-principles-on-use-of-ai-in-education/. [11]JULIA B.Critical reflections on regulation[J].Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy,2002,27(1):1-35. [12]GRAY J.Is it time to highlight the limits of risk-based financial regulation?[J].Capital Markets Law Journal,2009,4(1):50-62. [13]FORD C L.New governance,compliance and principles-based securities regulation[J].American Business Law Journal,2008,45(1):1-60. [14]BLACK J.Forms and paradoxes of principles-based regulation[J].Capital Markets Law Journal,2008,3(4):427. [15]CHAE Y.US AI regulation guide:Legislative overview and practical considerations[J].The Journal of Robotics,Artificial Intelligence & Law,2020,3(1):17-40. [16]曾雄,梁正,张辉.人工智能软法治理的优化进路:由软法先行到软法与硬法协同[J].电子政务,2024(6):99. [17]曾雄,梁正,张辉.欧美算法治理实践的新发展与我国算法综合治理框架的构建[J].电子政务,2022(7):68. [18]EUGENE B,KAGAN R.Going by the book:The problem of regulatory unreasonableness[M].Philadelphia:Temple University Press,1982. [19]李洪雷.走向衰落的自我规制:英国金融服务规制体制改革述评[J].行政法学研究,2016(3):41-54. [20]EUGENE B,KAGAN R.Going by the book:The problem of regulatory unreasonableness[M].Philadelphia:Temple University Press,1982. [21]安东尼·奥格斯.规制:法律形式与经济学理论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008. [22]谭冰霖.论政府对企业的内部管理型规制[J].法学家,2019(6):74-87. [23]IAN A,BRAITHWAITE J.Responsive regulation:transcending the deregulation debate[M].New York:Oxford University Press,1992. [24]COGLIANESE C,LAZER D.Management-based regulation:prescribing private management to achieve public goals[J].Law & Society Review,2003,37(4):693-694. [25]ROBERTS H,COWLS J,HINE E,et al.Achieving a“good AI society”:Comparing the aims and progress of the EU and the US[J].Science and Engineering Ethics,2021,27(68):14. [26]THAW D.The efficacy of cybersecurity regulation[J].Georgia State University Law Review,2013,30(2):287-371. [27]洪延青.“以管理为基础的规制”:对网络运营者安全保护义务的重构[J].环球法律评论,2016,38(4):36-37. [28]Management-based regulation:Implications for public policy[EB/OL].(2010-04-09)[2024-03-20].https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264082939-10-en. [29]刘华.法律与伦理的关系新论[J].政治与法律,2002(3):2-6. [30]柳经纬.标准与法律的融合[J].政法论坛,2016,34(6):18-29. [31]Regulating in a digital world[EB/OL].(2019-03-09)[2024-03-20].https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201719/ldselect/ldcomuni/299/299.pdf. [32]Generative AI Governance:Shaping a Collective Global Future[EB/OL].(2024-01-18)[2024-03-20].https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Generative_AI_Governance_2024.pdf. [33]考夫曼.法律哲学[M].刘幸义,译.北京:法律出版社,2004. [34]施密特·阿斯曼.行政法总论作为秩序理念:行政法体系建构的基础与任务[M].林明锵,译.台北:台湾元照出版公司,2009. [35]大桥洋一.行政法学的结构性变迁[M].吕艳滨,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008. [36]王贵松.风险社会与作为学习过程的法:读贝克的《风险社会》[J].交大法学,2013(4):175. [37]熊光清,熊健坤.多中心协同治理模式:一种具备操作性的治理方案[J].中国人民大学学报,2018(3):146. [38]何明升.中国网络治理的定位及现实路径[J].中国社会科学,2016(7):114.
2025, 
