基于高管团队人力资本调节作用的研发投资与企业绩效关系研究

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (898 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要本文以动态能力理论和高阶管理理论为基础, 实证研究高管人力资本在研发投资与企业绩效关系中的调节作用。研究结果表明: 企业研发投资与企业绩效之间呈显著的正相关关系; 高管人力资本深度显著正向调节研发投资与企业绩效关系; 高管人力资本广度显著正向调节研发投资与企业绩效关系。论文深化了研发投资与企业绩效关系的研究, 为企业高管团队建设以及动态能力理论的操作运用提供有价值的管理启示。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	王文华
	张卓
	黄奇

关键词 ：高管团队人力资本, 动态能力, 研发投资, 企业绩效

Abstract：The paper studies on moderating effects of human capital of top management team on the relationship between R&D investment and firm performance based on the theory of dynamic capabilities and high order management. The results show that R&D investment has a significant positive relationship with firm performance;The depth of human capital of top management team has a significant positive moderating effects on the relationship between R&D investment and firm performance;The scope of human capital of top management team has a significant positive moderating effects on the relationship between R&D investment and firm performance. The paper deepen the research of the relationship between R&D investment and firm performance and provide valuable managerial implication for the construction of top management team and the operation of the theory of dynamic capabilities

Key words： Human capital of top management team Dynamic capabilities R&D investment Firm performance

收稿日期: 2013-09-10

PACS:

F062

基金资助:航空科学基金项目“航空工业企业跨业务协同发展路径及有效性研究”(2013ZG52077); 江苏省软科学基金项目“区域创新平台人才聚集的机制及对策研究”(BR2012011); 江苏省高校哲学社会科学基金项目“江苏高科技企业研发融资约束及缓解对策研究”(2013SJB6300003)。

作者简介: 王文华(1975-), 男, 湖北黄冈人, 博士研究生, 副教授; 研究方向: 知识资本与研发投资。

引用本文:

王文华, 张卓, 黄奇. 基于高管团队人力资本调节作用的研发投资与企业绩效关系研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2014(6): 115-120.
Wang Wenhua, Zhang Zhuo, Huang Qi. Research on Relationship of R&D Investment and Firm Performance Based on Moderating Effect of Human Capital of Top Management Team. , 2014(6): 115-120.

链接本文:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/CN/Y2014/I6/115

[1]Wesley M Cohen, Daniel A Levinthal. Absorptive capacity:A new perspective on learning and innovation[J]. Adrninistrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35(1):128-152.
[2]Lee Fleming. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search[J]. Management Science, 2001, 47(6):117-132.
[3]Barney J B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage[J]. Journal of Management, 1991, 17(1):99-121.
[4]Zahra S A, Ireland R D, Hitt M A. International expansion by new venture firms:international diversity, mode of market entry, technology learning, and performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2000 43(5):925-950.
[5]梁莱歆, 严绍东. 中国上市公司R&D支出及其经济后果的实证研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2006, 32(7):34-38.
[6]王燕妮, 张书菊. R&D投入的价值相关性实证研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2011, 32(9):17-22.
[7]孙维峰, 黄祖辉. 广告支出、研发支出与企业绩效[J]. 科研管理, 2013, 34(2):44-51.
[8]Young R, Jordan E. Top management support:Mantra or necessity[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2008, 26(7):713-725.
[9]Hambrick D C, Mason P A. Upper echelons:Organization as a reflection of its managers[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9(2):193-206.
[10]Haynes K T, Hillman A. The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 31(11):1145-1163.
[11]Thamhain H J. Managing innovative R&D teams[J]. R&D Management, 2003, 33(3):297-311.
[12]Amason A C, Sapienza H J. The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict[J]. Journal of Management, 1997, 23(4):495-516.
[13]William E Souder, Rudy K Moenaert. Integrating marketing and R&D personnel within invation projects:An information uncertainty model[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 1992, 29(4):486-512.
[14]欧阳桃花, 蔚剑枫. 研发-营销界面市场协同机制研究：“海尔”案例[J]. 管理学报, 2011, 8(1):12-18.
[15]Teece D. Capturing value from knowledge assets:The new economy, markets for knowhow, and intangible assets[J]. California Management Review, 1998;40(3):55-79.
[16]Mahoney J T. Resourcebased theory, dynamic capabilities, and real options[J]. Economic Foundations of Strategy, 2005, 14(6):167-217