Abstract：This paper researches the relationship of science and technology intermediary,venture capital,cultural fusion and university industry collaboration(UIC)effectiveness carrying on system dynamics.The conclusions are as follows:①The numbers of actual collaboration,satisfied collaboration and in-depth collaboration are increasing and failed collabotation are decreasing along with the influence of S&T intermediary and venture capital increasing.②Venture capital has had a bigger influence on the failed collaborations diminishing,and S&T intermediary has had a stronger influence on the numbers increasing of actual collaboration,satisfied collaboration and in-depth collaboration.③As the cultural fusion is intensive,satisfied collaboration and in-depth collaboration are ever-increasing and failed collaboration is runing down steadily.④It is an effective means for promoting the effectiveness of UIC to enhance the influencing capability of S&T intermediary,venture capital and cultural fusion in university-industry collaborative process
李梅芳, 王俊, 欧忠辉, 赵永翔. 科技中介、风险投资与文化融合影响产学研合作成效研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2014(6): 121-127.
Li Meifang, Wang Jun, Ou Zhonghui, Zhao Yongxiang. The Influence of S&T Intermediary,Venture Capital and Cultural Fusion on the Effectiveness of University-industry Collaboration. , 2014(6): 121-127.
[1]Toshihiro K. The role of intermediation and absorptive capacity in facilitating university-industry linkages—An empirical study of TAMA in Japan[J]. Research Policy, 2008,(37):1224-1240.
[2]Jarunee W. The dynamic economic engine at Silicon Valley and US government programmes in financing innovations. Technovation, 2006, 9(26):1081-1089.
[3]Johan B, Pablo DEste, Ammon S. Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration[J]. Research Policy, 2010, 39(7):858-868.
[4]Antonio M P. The impact of technological relatedness, prior ties, and geographical distance on university–industry collaborations:A joint-patent analysis[J]. Technovation, 2011, 31(7):309-319.
[5]范德成, 唐小旭. 我国各省市产学研结合技术创新的绩效评价[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2009,(1):66-70.
[6]金芙蓉, 罗守贵. 产学研合作绩效评价指标体系研究[J]. 科学管理研究, 2009,(3):43-46.
[7]邹波, 于渤, 卜琳华. 校企知识转移网络中企业员工吸收能力研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2011, 29(1):106-111.
[8]鲁若愚, 张鹏, 张红琪. 产学研合作创新模式研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2012, 30(2):186-193.
[9]薛卫, 曹建国, 易难, 雷家骕. 企业与大学技术合作的绩效:基于合作治理视角的实证研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2010,(3):120-132.
[10]Harold Z Daniel, Donald J Hempel, Narasimhan S. A model of value assessment in collaborative R&D programs[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2002, 31(8):653-664.
[11]Simon P. Process model for university-industry research collaboration. European Journal of Innovation Management, 2008, 11(4):488-521.
[12]李梅芳, 赵永翔, 唐振鹏. 基于合作满意度的产学研合作成效关键影响因素研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2012, 30(12):1871-1880.
2014, 
