On Classification,Selection and Evaluation of Innovation Policy Instruments
Huang Man 1,2,Zhu Guilong 1,Hu Junyan3
1.School of Business Administration,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510641,China; 2.School of Business Administration,Guangzhou University,Guangzhou 510006,China; 3.School of Economics and Trade,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510006,China
Abstract：Based on foreign literature review,the paper studied the main classification methods,selection methods,effectiveness analysis and development trends of innovation policy instruments from the perspective of government intervention level.Research results show that:Theories applied in innovation policy are rich,but lack of theoretical framework for innovation policy instruments;The themes of innovation policy instruments remain relatively scattered,and the suitability of policy environment as well as multiple levels of subjects involved in policy instrument design should be further researched.
[1]ROY R,WALTER Z.Reindustrialization and technology[M].London:Logman Group Limited,1985. [2]LI C,CHENG Liping,YANG Yahui.Review and evaluation on government intervening the policies for industry research and development[M].Chung Hua Institution for Economic Research,1996. [3]ELMORE.Instruments and strategy in public policy[J].Policy studies review,1987(1):174-186. [4]INGRAM S.Behavioral assumption of policy tools.The journal of politics,1990(52):510-529. [5]LOWI.Four systems of policy,politics and choice[J].Public administration review,1972(4):298-31. [6]HOWLETT M,RAMESH M.Studying public policy:policy cycles and policy subsystems.Oxford:Oxford University Press.1995:80-98. [7]WU Y H,BRETSCHNEIDER P.The effects of innovation policies on business R&D:a cross-national empirical study[J].Economics of innovation and new technology,2007(4):237-253. [8]SHEEHAN J,WYCKOFF A.Targeting R&D:economic and policy implications of increasing R&D spending.STI working paper 2003(8). [9]HOWLETT M,RAMESH M.Globalization and the choice of governing instruments:the direct,indirect,and opportunity effects of internationalization[J].International public management journal,2006(2):68-76. [10]JAUMOTTE F,PAIN N.From innovation development to implementation:evidence from the community innovation survey.OECD economics department working papers,2005(5):34-42. [11]BIEGELBAUER P S,Borrás S.Innovation policies in Europe and the US:the new agenda[M].Ash gate.Great Britain,2003. [12]NEAL H A.Beyond sputnik:US science policy in the 21stc century[M].Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press,2008. [13]WOOLLEY J,ROTTNER R.Innovation policy and nanotechnology entrepreneurship[J].Entrepreneurship theory and practice,2008(5):791-811. [14]李纪珍.共性技术供给与扩散的模式选择[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2011,32(10):5-12. [15]SALAMON LM,ELLIOIT OV.The tools of government:a guide to the new governance[M].Oxford University Press,2002:21. [16]EDQUIST Z.Public procurement for innovation as mission-oriented innovation policy[J].Research Policy,2012(41):1757-1769.
2016, 
