Abstract：The legislation of American scientific misconduct whistleblower protection are fine and specific at all levels,forming a relatively perfect system.Federal agencies and research institutions perform duties of the whistleblower protection by arranging specific person,both clear division of labor and mutual cooperation.Whistleblower protection of personal information security is throughout each stage of the investigation of scientific misconduct.America prohibits retaliatory personnel behavior on whistleblower.High reward and compensation are also important part of scientific misconduct whistleblower protection system.There is no specific whistleblower protection law in China and the utility of the legal basis for scientific misconduct whistleblower is relatively low
董兴佩. 中美科研不端举报人保护制度之比较[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2016(10): 155-160.
Dong Xingpei. Comparison of the Scientific Misconduct Whistleblower Protection Systems Between China and America. , 2016(10): 155-160.
[1]PARK D W.False claims act[J].Government procurement,2003,11(2):26. [2]KNUDSEN S,JAKUS L,METZ M.The civil service reform act of 1978[J].Public personnel management,1979,8(3):170. [3]DEVINE T M.The whistleblower protection act of 1989:foundation for the modern law of employment dissent[J].Administrative law review,1999,51(2):531-576. [4]NSF.NSF's.Research misconduct regulation is found at 45 CFR 689.[EB/OL].[2015-07-01].http://www.nsf.gov/oig/_pdf/cfr/45-CFR-689.pdf. [5]HHS.Former scientific misconduct regulations-42 CFR part 50,subpart a:May 1989-May 2005[EB/OL].[2015-07-01].http://ori.hhs.gov/reg-sub-part-a. [6]Office of science and technology policy.Federal research misconduct policy[EB/OL].[2015-07-01].http://ori.hhs.gov/federal-research-misconduct-policy. [7]蒋美仕,唐军,周莉.从职业伦理到公共政策的制度性转变——美国应对科研不端行为的政策法规体系[J].中国科技论坛,2008(12):134. [8]和鸿鹏,王聪,李真真.美国科研不端举报人保护制度研究[J].中国科学基金,2015(4):272. [9]POON P.Legal protections for the scientific misconduct whistleblower[J].Journal of law medicine & ethics,2012,173(23):88-94. [10]HERMAN K G,HERZ C H.Investigating misconduct in science:the national science foundation model[J].Journal of higher education,1994,65(3):384-400. [11]HHS.Strategies for responding to research misconduct allegations[EB/OL].[2015-07-01].http://ori.hhs.gov/policies/phs_alert.shtml. [12]PHS.Public health service(PHS)policies on research misconduct-42 CFR part 93-June 2005[J].Federal register:May 17,2005,70(94):28369-28400. [13]ORI.Sample policy & procedures for responding to research misconduct allegations[EB/OL].[2015-07-01].http://ori.hhs.gov/sample-policy-procedures-responding-research-misconduct-allegations. [14]WRIGHT David.大学科研诚信专员的地位和作用[J].科研诚信建设工作通讯,2010(4):23. [15]王阳,程晖.论美国科学不端行为调查的科学对话模式——兼论与美国司法模式的张力[J].中国科技论坛,2009(12):140. [16]SLATE R N.The federal witness protection program:its evolution and continuing growing pains[J].Criminal justice ethics,1997,16(2):20-34. [17]邹强.美最高法院扩大对举报人保护 最新裁决拓宽《吹口哨人保护法》适用范围[EB/OL].[2015-07-01].http://www.legaldaily.com.cn/Frontier_of_law/content/2014-03/11/content_5347441.htm?node=34808. [18]Office of the general counsel.The whistleblower's conditional privilege to report allegations of scientific misconduct[EB/OL].[2015-07-01].http://ori.hhs.gov/. [19]董兴佩.学术不端行为惩戒立法论纲[J].山东科技大学学报(社会科学版),2007(5):32. [20]方玉东,王持恒,常宏建,陈越.举报科研不端行为的形式及其利弊分析[J].中国高校科技,2015(9):7.
2016, 
