Abstract：Based on the social-technical theory,this paper analyzed the main elements and feedback mechanism of China's power grid transformation from three levels:landscape,regime and niche.The process of power grid transformation is divided into four stages,including the reinforce of macro-pressure,the emergence of multi-niche,the maturity of predominant niche,the establishment of new regime.Then,obstacles to development are revealed from four aspects:the power grid security,structure evolution of power gird,policy guidance and the habits of market and consumer.Based on the transformation obstacles,there are corresponding to four transition path:the operation security,the intelligent management,the using intelligence and the green power grid.Finally,we provided policy recommendations for China's power grid development,which government decision-making and regulation would be the most crucial element
[1] 光明网.《国民经济和社会发展第十三个五年规划纲要(草案)》[EB/OL].(2016-03-06)[2016-05-01].http://news.gmw.cn/2016-03/06/content_19187914_2.htm?8996. [2]WEBER K M.Transforming large socio-technical systems towards sustainability:on the role of users and future visions for the uptake of city logistics and combined heat and power generation[J].Innovation,2003,16(2):155-176. [3]GEELSs F W.From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems:insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory[J].Research policy,2004,33(6-7):897-920. [4]YCEL G,VAN Daalen C.A simulation-based analysis of transition pathways for the Dutch electricity system[J].Energy policy,2012,42:557-568. [5]吕涛,王春玲,王飞.社会—技术系统转型理论及其在能源系统转型中的应用[J].中国科技论坛,2015(10):109-114. [6]薛奕曦,邵鲁宁,尤建新,毕晓航.面向新能源汽车的社会—技术域分析及其转型推动研究[J].中国软科学,2013(03):78-88. [7]MAH D N Y,VANDER VLEUTEN J M,IP J C M,HILLS P R.Governing the transition of socio-technical systems:a case study of the development of smart grids in Korea[J].Energy policy,2012.45:133-141. [8]VERBONG G P,GEELS F W.Exploring sustainability transitions in the electricity sector with socio-technical pathways[J].Technological forecasting and social change,2010,77(8):1214-1221. [9]YUAN J,XU Y,HU Z.Delivering power system transition in China[J].Energy policy,2012(50):751-772. [10]董朝阳,赵俊华,文福拴.从智慧电网到能源互联网:基本概念与研究框架[J].电力系统自动化,2014,38(15):1-11. [11]曾鸣,杨雍琦,刘敦楠,等.能源互联网“源-网-荷-储”协调优化运营模式及关键技术[J].电网技术,2016(01):114-124. [12]严太山,程浩忠,曾平良.能源互联网体系架构及关键技术[J].电网技术,2016(01):105-113. [13]BOELIE Elzen,FRANK W.GEELS,KENNETH Green.System Innovation and the transition to sustainability:theory,evidence and policy[M].Edward Elgar Publishing,2004. [14]GEELS F.Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes:a multi-level perspective and a case-study[J].Research policy,2002,31(8-9):1257-1274. [15]GEELS F.Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations:Refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective[J].Technological forecasting & social change,2005,72(6):681-696. [16]陈卓淳,姚遂.中国电力系统低碳转型的路径探析——基于社会技术转型思路[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2012,22(2):62-68. [17]财经网博客.“弃风弃光”严重,如何走出电力过剩困局[EB/OL].(2016-04-08)[2016-05-01]. http://blog.caijing.com.cn/expert_article-151158-89941.shtml. [18]中国网.2016年国务院总理李克强政府工作报告(全文)[EB/OL].(2016-03-05)[2016-05-01].http://www.china.com.cn/guoqing/2016-03/05/content_37944298_9.htm. [19]AUDLEY Genus,Anne-Marie Coles.Rethinking the multi-level perspective of technological transitions[J].Research policy,2008,37(9):1436-1445. [20]GEELS F W.The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions:responses to seven criticisms[J].Environmental innovation and societal transitions,2011,1(1):24-40. [21]HOFMAN P S,ELZEN B.Exploring system innovation in the electricity system through socio-technical scenarios[J].Technology analysis & strategic management 2010;22(6):653-670.
2017, 
