1.School of Economics and Management,Southeast University,Nanjing 211189,China; 2.School of Engineer,Nanjing Agriculture University,Nanjing 210031,China
Abstract：This article introduced the conception of formal and informal network consistency,and studied the mechanism of knowledge exchange and combination.The results showed that consistency between formal sequence workflow network and informal advisory network was negatively associated with knowledge exchange and combination;Consistency between formal interaction workflow network and informal advisory network had an inverted U-shaped influence on knowledge exchange and combination;Besides,organization communication had a mediation influence between the consistency of interaction workflow and informal advisory network and knowledge exchange and combination.The conclusions have an important implications for future study and have a good reference for enterprise to improve knowledge exchange and combination skills
[1]COLLINS C J,SMITH K G.Knowledge exchange and combination:the role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms[J].Academy of management journal,2006,49(3):544-560. [2]MICHAELIS B,WAGNER J D,SCHWEIZER L.Knowledge as a key in the relationship between high-performance work systems and workforce productivity[J].Journal of business research,2015,68(5):1035-1044. [3]CARMELI A,WALDMAN D A.Leadership,behavioral context,and the performance of work groups in a knowledge-intensive setting[J].Journal of technology transfer,2010,35(4):384-400. [4]CHEN D,MOCKER M,PRESTON D S,et al.Information systems strategy:reconceptualization,measurement,and implications[J].MIS quarterly,2010,34(2):233-259. [5]CHOU S C,BUSTAMANTE J F,GOMES J L.Evaluation of eta model seasonal precipitation forecasts over south America[J].Nonlinear processes in geophysics,2005,12(4):537-555. [6]BORGATTI S P,HALGIN D S.On network theory[J].Organization science,2011,22:1168-1181. [7]SODA G,ZAHEER A.A network perspective on organizational architecture:performance effects of the interplay of formal and informal organization[J].Strategic management journal,2012,33(6):751-771. [8]BIANCANI S,MCFARLAND D A,DAHLANDER L.The semiformal organization[J].Organization science,2014,25(5):1306-1324. [9]BRASS D J,GALASKIEWICZ J,GREVE H R,et al.Taking stock of networks and organizations:a multilevel perspective[J].Academy of management journal,2004,47(6):795-817. [10]WALDSTRM C.Informal networks in organizations:a literature review[C].University of Aarhus,Aarhus School of Business,Department of Management,2001. [11]KRACKHARDT D,HANSON J R.Informal networks:the company behind the chart[J].Harvard business review,1993,71(4):104-111. [12]MARCH J G.Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J].Organization science,1991,2(1):71-87. [13]TANG F,MU J,THOMAS E.Who knows what in NPD teams:communication context,mode,and task contingencies[J].Journal of product innovation management,2015,32(3):404-423. [14]罗家德,施淑惠,林敬尧.以濡染模型研究关系网络对计算机态度之影响[J].信息社会研究,2002(2):139-164. [15]LEWIS K.Measuring transactive memory systems in the field:scale development and validation[J].Journal of applied psychology,2003,88(4):587-604. [16]温忠麟,叶宝娟.中介效应分析:方法和模型发展[J].心理科学进展,2014(5):731-745.
2017, 
