Abstract：Based on the 104 cities of the Yangtze River Economic Belt with 2001—2013 panel data and the influence of urbanization,industrial development,service industry development and other factors,the influence of fiscal decentralization and institutional quality on urban sprawl in China is studied.The major findings of the study are summarized as follows.Firstly,the institutional quality is an important factor to promote the spread of China’s cities.Superior system environment has more advantages in attracting foreign investment and agglomeration of population,which leads to the expansion of urban size faster than the speed of urban population expansion.Secondly,Fiscal decentralization curbs the rapid spread of the city,meaning that fiscal decentralization effect is greater than the land in the urbanization of population urbanization,namely the fiscal decentralization of population agglomeration effect is greater than its expansion effect on land.Thirdly,urbanization,industrial development and service development are the driving forces for the rapid spread of cities in China.On the basis of this,the paper puts forward to control the rapid expansion of the city is an important realistic problem that needs to be paid attention to in the process of urbanization and economic development of China in the future.
李强, 左静娴. 财政分权、制度质量与城市蔓延——来自长江经济带的例证[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2017(9): 123-130.
Li Qiang,ZuoJingxian. Fiscal Decentralization,Institutional Quality and Urban Sprawl——Examples from the Yangtze River Economic Belt. , 2017(9): 123-130.
[1] LOPEZ R,HYNESH P.Sprawl in the 1990s:Measurement,distribution and trends[J].Urban affairs review,2003,38:325-355. [2]KAHN M.Does sprawl reduce the black/white housing consumption gap[J].Housing policy debate,2001,12(1):77-86. [3]刘洪银,王向.城市蔓延与服务业发展——基于城市面板数据的实证研究[J].财贸研究,2015(3):1-11. [4]GALSTER G,HANSON R,Wolman H,et al.Sprawl to the ground:defining and measuring an elusive concept[J].Housing policy debate,2001,12(4):681-717. [5]HASSE J E,LATHROP R G.Land resource impact indicators of urban sprawl[J].Applied geography,2003,23:159-175. [6]FALLAH BN,PARTRIDGE MD,ROSE OM.Urban sprawl and productivity:evidence from US metropolitan areas[J].Papers in regional science,2011,90(3):451-472. [7]秦蒙,刘修岩.城市蔓延是否带来了我国城市生产效率的损失?——基于夜间灯光数据的实证研究[J].财经研究,2015(7):28-40. [8]BRUECKNER J K.Urban sprawl:diagnosis and remedies[J].International regional science review,2000,23:160-171. [9]陈建华.我国城市蔓延问题成因分析[J].现代经济探讨,2009(4):76-79. [10]张帆.中国城市蔓延的影响因素分析——基于35个大中城市面板数据的实证研究[J].湖北社会科学,2012(5):69-72. [11]李效顺,曲福田,陈友偲,牟守国.经济发展与城市蔓延的Logistic曲线假说及其验证——基于华东地区典型城市的考察[J].自然资源学报,2012(5):713-722. [12]CARRUTHERS J I,ULFARSSON G F.Fragmentation and sprawl:evidence from interregional analysis[J].Growth and change,2002,33:312-340. [13]BURCHFIELD M,OVERMAN H G,PUGA D,et al.Causes of sprawl:a portrait from space[J].Quarterly journal of economics,2002,121(2):587-633. [14]HENDERSON,et al.Measuring economic growth from outer space[J].American economic review,2012,102(2):994-1028. [15]刘修岩,李松林,秦蒙.开发时滞、市场不确定性与城市蔓延[J].经济研究,2016(8):159-171. [16]秦蒙,刘修岩,李松林.中国的“城市蔓延之谜”——来自政府行为视角的空间面板数据分析[J].经济学动态,2016(7):21-33. [17]李强,魏巍.制度变迁与区域进出口贸易的关联:强制性抑或诱致性[J].改革,2013(2):11-18. [18]丁菊红,邓可斌.政府偏好、公共品供给与转型中的财政分权[J].经济研究,2008(7):78-89. [19]范子英,张军.财政分权、转移支付与国内市场整合[J].经济研究,2010(3):53-64. [20]洪世健,张京祥.城市蔓延机理与治理——基于经济与制度的分析[M].南京:东南大学出版社,2012. [21]李强,高楠.城市蔓延的生态环境效应研究——基于34个大中城市面板数据的分析[J].中国人口科学,2016(6):58-67. [22]杨友才.包含产权制度溢出性的经济增长空间面板模型的实证研究[J].经济科学,2010(4):27-37.
2017, 
