Open Innovation and Formation of Technical Standards in the Process of Internationalization——A Perspective from Neo-institutionalism
Gao Zhaojun1,Li Zhengwei2
1.Business School of Changzhou University,Changzhou 213164,China; 2.College of Economics and Management,Zhejiang University of Technology,Hangzhou 310023,China
Abstract：From a neo-institutional economics perspective and incorporating firm innovation and internationalization theories,this paper discusses the relationship between the open innovation and technical standards formation of global firms,and examines the effect mechanism of institutional legitimacy.Results of Poisson Regression and Survival Analysis on high-tech firms show that the firm internationalization and the inbound model of open innovation promote formation of technical standards.However,they are influenced by institutional legitimacy.Influencing mechanisms of internal and external are different.It indicates that external institutional legitimacy more improves the total number of technical standards;while internal more improves the formation of the first technical standard
高照军,李正卫. 国际化过程中的开放式创新与技术标准制定——基于新制度主义的视角[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2017(12): 5-14.
Gao Zhaojun,Li Zhengwei. Open Innovation and Formation of Technical Standards in the Process of Internationalization——A Perspective from Neo-institutionalism. , 2017(12): 5-14.
[1]宋明顺,赵志强,张勇,等.基于知识 产权与标准化的贸易技术壁垒——“国际贸易技术壁垒与标准化问题”研讨会综述[J].经济研究,2009(3):155-158. [2]文嫮.技术标准中专利分布影响下的价值链治理模式研究——以移动通信产业为例[J].中国工业经济,2007(4):119-127. [3]KATZ M L,SHAPIRO C.Network externalities,competition,and compatibility[J].The American economic review,1985,424-440. [4]DE MAEIJER E,VAN HOUT T,WEGGEMAN M,et al.Studying open innovation collaboration between the high-tech industry and science with linguistic ethnography-battling over the status of knowledge in a setting of distrust[J].Journal of innovation management,2017,4(4),8-31. [5]吴洁,彭星星,盛永祥,等.基于动态控制模型的产学研知识转移合作博弈研究[J].中国管理科学,2017,25(3):190-196. [6]CHESBROUGH H W.Open innovation:the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology[M].Boston:Harvard Business Publishing Corporation,2003. [7]TASSEY G.Standardization in technology-based markets[J].Research policy,2000,29(4-5):587-602. [8]李冬梅,宋志红.网络模式、标准联盟与主导设计的产生[J].科学学研究,2017,35(3):428-437. [9]魏津瑜,刘月,南广友,等.基于技术标准的高技术产业集群创新绩效与定价模式研究[J].科学管理研究,2017,35(1):51-54. [10]高照军,蒋耘莛.内向型创新、国际化与创新绩效的关系研究:基于吸收能力视角的统计分析[J].统计研究,2016,33(11):63-70. [11]高照军.内向型创新、国际化与吸收能力影响技术标准的机制研究[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33(5):28-32. [12]曹群,刘任重.基于技术标准的技术进步策略选择:一个进化博弈分析[J].经济管理,2012,34(7):154-162. [13]AXELROD R,MITCHELL W,THOMAS R E,et al.Coalition formation in standard-setting alliances[J].Management science,1995,41(9):1493-1508. [14]FARRELL J,SALONER G.Standardization,compatibility,and innovation[J].The RAND journal of economics,1985,70-83. [15]LEIPONEN A E.Competing through cooperation:the organization of standard setting in wireless telecommunications[J].Management science,2008,54(11):1904-1919. [16]王珊珊,王宏起,邓敬斐.产业联盟技术标准化过程及政府支持策略研究[J].科学学研究,2012,30(3):380-386. [17]CHESBROUGH H,CROWTHER A K.Beyond high tech:early adopters of open innovation in other industries[J].R&D management 36,3,2006,229-236. [18]DAHLANDER L,GANN D M.How open is innovation?[J]. Research policy,2010,39:699-709. [19]COHEN W M,LEVINTHAL D A.Absorptive capacity:a new perspective on learning and innovation[J].Administrative science quarterly,1990,35(1):128-152. [20]KUROKAWA S,PELC K I,FUJISUE K.Strategic management of technology in Japanese firms:literature review[J].International journal of technology management,2005,30(3-4):223-247. [21]KOTABE M,SRINIVASAN S S,AULAKH P S.Multinationality and firm performance:the moderating role of R&D and marketing capabilities[J].Journal of international business studies,2002,33(1):79-97. [22]KAFOUROS M I,BUCKLEY P J,SHARP J A,et al.The role of internationalization in explaining innovation performance[J].Technovation,2008,28(1):63-74. [23]ROTHAEMEL F T.Incumbent‘s advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation[J].Strategic management journal,2001,22(6-7):687-699. [24]杨书燕,吴小节,汪秀琼.制度逻辑研究的文献计量分析[J].管理评论,2017,29(3):90-109. [25]BITEKINEA,HACCK P.The“Macro”and the“Micro”of legitimacy:toward a multilevel theory of the legitimacy process[J].Academy of management review,2015,40(1):49-75. [26]CHENS T,HAGA K Y A,FONG C M.The effects of institutional legitimacy,social capital,and government relationship on clustered firms’ performance in emerging economies[J].Journal of organizational change management,2016,29(4):529-550. [27]田宇,杨艳玲.贫困地区新创企业创业者关系网络对其组织合法性的影响机制研究[J].管理学报,2017,14(2):176-184. [28]LIOU R S,CHAO M C,ELLSTRAND A.Unpacking institutional distance:addressing human capital development and emerging-market firms’ownership strategy in an advanced economy[J].Thunderbird international business review,2016,59(3):281-295. [29]DIMAGGIO P J,POWELL W W.The iron cage revisited:institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields[J].American sociological review,1983,147-160. [30]尹珏林,任兵.组织场域的衰落,重现与制度创业:基于中国直销行业的案例研究[J].管理世界,2009,S1:13－26. [31]高照军,武常岐.制度理论视角下的企业创新行为研究——基于国家高新区企业的实证分析[J].科学学研究,2014,32(10):1450－1462. [32]王晓红,谢兰兰.金融危机后全球跨国直接投资的主要特征及趋势研究[J].宏观经济研究,2017(3):32-47. [33]张宏如.中国式EAP:科技创新人才激励的新视角[J].科学管理研究,2012,30(6):85-88.
2017, 
