包容型领导对商业模式创新的影响——差错管理氛围与即兴行为的中介作用

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (14)

全文: PDF (5579 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要本文从包容型领导这一企业内部因素出发,以自我决定理论为基础,分析了包容型领导对企业商业模式创新的内在机制,探讨了差错管理氛围和即兴行为的中介作用。研究结果表明,包容型领导分别对差错管理氛围、员工即兴行为和商业模式创新有直接影响作用;包容型领导通过差错管理氛围影响到商业模式创新;包容型领导通过差错管理氛围影响到员工即兴行为,进而影响到企业商业模式的创新。该研究有利于从企业内部挖掘商业模式创新的动力和机制,为企业管理实践提供更好的指导。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	李江涛
	王亮

关键词 ：包容型领导, 差错管理氛围, 即兴行为, 商业模式创新

Abstract：n the basis of self-determination theory,this paper analyzed the effect of inclusive leadership on business model innovation and the mediating roles of error management climate and employees improvisation from the perspective of internal factors.The results show that inclusive leadership has a direct effect on error management climate,employees improvisation and business model innovation respectively.Error management climate mediates the relationship between inclusive leadership and employees improvisation.Inclusive leadership affects employees improvisation through error management climate,thus affecting the business model innovation.The results of this study are helpful for finding the motivation and mechanism of business model innovation in the enterprise,and provide better guidance for enterprise management practice.

Key words： Inclusive leadership Error management climate Improvisation Business model innovation

收稿日期: 2017-05-22

PACS:

F270

基金资助:北京市社会科学院“新常态下北京高端工业区如何提速增效”(2015A2484)、“平台思想:构建基业长青的企业格局”(2016C3477)。

作者简介: 李江涛(1966-),男,山东烟台人,北京市社会科学院副研究员;研究方向:管理科学与工程、商业模式。

引用本文:

李江涛,王亮. 包容型领导对商业模式创新的影响——差错管理氛围与即兴行为的中介作用[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2018(2): 128-135.
Li Jiangtao,Wang Liang. The Influence of Inclusive Leadership on Enterprise Business Model Innovation:The Mediating Role of Error Management Climate and Employees' Improvisation. , 2018(2): 128-135.

链接本文:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/CN/Y2018/I2/128

[1] 迟考勋,等.商业模式研究中的认知视角述评与研究框架构建[J] .外国经济与管理,2016(05):3-17.
[2] 冯华,陈亚琦.平台商业模式创新研究——基于互联网环境下的时空契合分析[J] .中国工业经济,2016(03):99-113.
[3] MALMSTRM M,等.Cognitive constructions of low-profit and high-profit business models:a repertory grid study of serial entrepreneurs[J] .Entrepreneurship theory and practice,2015,39(5):1083-1109.
[4] KYRIAKOPOULOS K.Improvisation in product innovation:the contingent role of market information sources and memory types[J] .Organization studies,2011,32(8):1051-1078.
[5] BINGHAM C B,EISENHARDT K M.Rational heuristics:the‘simple rules’that strategists learn from process experience[J] .Strategic management journal,2011,32(13):1437-1464.
[6] 黄勇,彭纪生.组织即兴:现状与展望[J] .管理学报,2012(07):1084-1091.
[7] CASADESUS-MASANELL R,LLANES G.Mixed source[J] .Management science,2011,57(7):1212-1230.
[8] CARMELI A,等.Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace:the mediating role of psychological safety[J] .Creativity research journal,2010,22(3):250-260.
[9] 尹奎,孙健敏,陈乐妮.差错管理氛围研究述评与展望[J] .外国经济与管理,2016(02):75-87.
[10] RYAN R M,DECI E L.Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation,social development,and well-being[J] .American psychologist,2000,55(1):68.
[11] 罗珉,李亮宇.互联网时代的商业模式创新:价值创造视角[J] .中国工业经济,2015(01):95-107.
[12] 阎婧,刘志迎,郑晓峰.环境动态性调节作用下的变革型领导、商业模式创新与企业绩效[J] .管理学报,2016(08):1208-1214.
[13] 方阳春.包容型领导风格对团队绩效的影响——基于员工自我效能感的中介作用[J] .科研管理,2014(05):152-160.
[14] 管春英.包容性领导对员工创新行为的多链条作用机制研究[J] .科学学与科学技术管理,2016(06):159-168.
[15] VAN DYCK C,等.Organizational error management culture and its impact on performance:a two-study replication[J] .Journal of applied psychology,2005,90(6):1.
[16] GRONEWOLD U,等.Reporting self-made errors:the impact of organizational error-management climate and error type[J] .Journal of business ethics,2013,117(1):189-208.
[17] 马跃如,余航海,丁明星,程伟波.包容性领导研究综述[J] .科技进步与对策,2015(12):156-160.
[18] 唐宁玉,张凯丽.包容性领导研究述评与展望[J] .管理学报,2015(06):932-938.
[19] VERA D,CROSSAN M.Improvisation and innovative performance in teams[J] .Organization science,2005,16(3):203-224.
[20] CANNON M D,EDMONDSON A C.Confronting failure:antecedents and consequences of shared beliefs about failure in organizational work groups[J] .Journal of organizational behavior,2001,22(2):161-177.
[21] FRESE M,KEITH N.Action errors,error management,and learning in organizations[J] .Annual review of psychology,2015,66:661-687.
[22] BELL B S,KOZLOWSKI S W.Active learning:effects of core training design elements on self-regulatory processes,learning,and adaptability[J] .Journal of applied psychology,2008,93(2):296.
[23] 王重鸣,郭维维,MICHAEL F,ANDREAS R.创业者差错取向的绩效作用及其跨文化比较[J] .心理学报,2008(11):1203-1211.
[24] MCKNIGHT B,BONTIS N.E-improvisation:collaborative groupware technology expands the reach and effectiveness of organizational improvisation[J] .Knowledge and process management,2002,9(4):219-227.
[25] 买忆媛,叶竹馨,陈淑华.从“兵来将挡,水来土掩”到组织惯例形成——转型经济中新企业的即兴战略研究[J] .管理世界,2015(08):147-165.
[26] BERLINER P F.Thinking in jazz:the infinite art of improvisation[M] .University of Chicago Press,2009.
[27] 张越,赵树宽.基于要素视角的商业模式创新机理及路径[J] .财贸经济,2014(06):90-99.
[28] CIGULAROV K P,等.The effects of error management climate and safety communication on safety:a multi-level study[J] .Accident analysis & prevention,2010,42(5):1498-1506.
[29] ZOTT C,AMIT R.Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms[J] .Organization science,2007,18(2):181-199.
[30] HAYES A F.Introduction to mediation,moderation,and conditional process analysis:a regression-based approach[M] .Guilford Press,2013.