Abstract：Human Genetic information is the personal essential information with great value,which triggers ownership disputes.In this paper,with the reference of the United States,the rationality and controversy against ownership of genetic information by the individual,the acquirer,family members or the whole mankind were analyzed.After balancing the interests,it is suggested that the acquirer should own property interests of human genetic information,the doctor should be conferred with liability of warning genetic risks to balance the interests of the individual and family members,in the meanwhile,the protection of personal interests should be enhanced by informed consent and information security.
[1]ROBERTS J L.Theories of Genetic Ownership[EB/OL].http://petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/assets/publications/Roberts_Genetic_Ownership_Draft.pdf. [2]SPRINGER J A,et al.Ethics,Privacy,and the Future of Genetic Information in Health Information Assurance and Security[EB/OL].http://www.igi-global.com/chapter/ethics-privacy-future-genetic-information/46346. [3]LUCASSEN A.Should families own genetic information? Yes[J].British medical journal,2007,335(7609):22. [4]姚大志.当代功利主义哲学[J].世界哲学,2015(2):51. [5]肇旭.欧洲医药、生物技术领域不可专利客体的演变及启示[J].知识产权,2015(4):139. [6]MOORE V.Regents of the University of California[Z].793 P.2d 479(Cal.1990). [7]BARRAD C M V.Genetic information and property theory[J].Northwestern university law review,1992—1993,87(3):1050. [8]WEEDEN J L.Genetic liberty,genetic property:protecting genetic information[J].Ave maria law review,2006,4(2):630. [9]PRINCE A E R.Comprehensive protection of genetic information:one size privacy or property models may not fit all[J].Brooklyn law review,2013,79(1):195-197. [10]PATE V.Threlkel[Z].661 So.2d 278(Fla.1995). [11]SAFER v.The Estate of Pack[Z].677 A.2d 1188,1189-1190(N.J.Super.Ct.App.Div.1996).
2018, 
